GDT: #66 | Sharks at Flyers | March 12, 2024 | 7:00 PM | NBCSP

Status
Not open for further replies.

VladDrag

Registered User
Feb 6, 2018
6,263
15,985
@Beef Invictus this is game 66. They've played 65 up to this point. FYI.

Frost doesn't deserve to get scratched even if his play has dipped the last 10 games or so. I think Torts is right for once about how he needs to be a little more consistent

Awesome time for a get right game for him vs the Sharks

Over the last 10 games, the team as a whole has been shitty offensively, while being awesome defensively. Both their rolling averages for xGF and xGA/60 have dropped over that span. In other words, this team is not producing scoring chances, and are also preventing score chances against.

This is pure speculation, but since they are in a playoff push, I have to imagine that Torts is gonna push what he does best; defensive play. In some of his pressers, Torts has talks about recalibrating when the team 'turns back' (his term he uses to identify when forwards should aggressively pressure on forecheck, and when they should 'turn back' to the backcheck and establish positioning in the NZ). I would guess that the focus from the coaching staff right now is an earlier turn back and setup in the NZ, and I think that has a negative affect on scoring opportunities for everyone. From my eye, that feels like what's been happening lately as well.

I know I'm a Frost guy, and I know I have a certain bias here. I acknowledge he has not been strong offensively over the last 10 games (his defensive numbers have been pretty consistent however). But I also think it's a bit unfair to specifically call out Frost when the entire team has not been good at generating changes as a whole over the last 10 game.
 

ajgoal

Almost always never serious
Jun 29, 2015
9,843
28,579
@Beef Invictus this is game 66. They've played 65 up to this point. FYI.



Over the last 10 games, the team as a whole has been shitty offensively, while being awesome defensively. Both their rolling averages for xGF and xGA/60 have dropped over that span. In other words, this team is not producing scoring chances, and are also preventing score chances against.

This is pure speculation, but since they are in a playoff push, I have to imagine that Torts is gonna push what he does best; defensive play. In some of his pressers, Torts has talks about recalibrating when the team 'turns back' (his term he uses to identify when forwards should aggressively pressure on forecheck, and when they should 'turn back' to the backcheck and establish positioning in the NZ). I would guess that the focus from the coaching staff right now is an earlier turn back and setup in the NZ, and I think that has a negative affect on scoring opportunities for everyone. From my eye, that feels like what's been happening lately as well.

I know I'm a Frost guy, and I know I have a certain bias here. I acknowledge he has not been strong offensively over the last 10 games (his defensive numbers have been pretty consistent however). But I also think it's a bit unfair to specifically call out Frost when the entire team has not been good at generating changes as a whole over the last 10 game.
How does Frost's dip compare to the other forwards? I actually imagine it would be larger, his playstyle seems like it would take a bigger hit from a less aggressive offense.
 

VladDrag

Registered User
Feb 6, 2018
6,263
15,985
How does Frost's dip compare to the other forwards? I actually imagine it would be larger, his playstyle seems like it would take a bigger hit from a less aggressive offense.
Give me some time to look into it. It's going to take some excel work to actively answer that question.

Without looking at the numbers, I would imagine that's true.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,141
170,468
Armored Train
@Beef Invictus this is game 66. They've played 65 up to this point. FYI.



Over the last 10 games, the team as a whole has been shitty offensively, while being awesome defensively. Both their rolling averages for xGF and xGA/60 have dropped over that span. In other words, this team is not producing scoring chances, and are also preventing score chances against.

This is pure speculation, but since they are in a playoff push, I have to imagine that Torts is gonna push what he does best; defensive play. In some of his pressers, Torts has talks about recalibrating when the team 'turns back' (his term he uses to identify when forwards should aggressively pressure on forecheck, and when they should 'turn back' to the backcheck and establish positioning in the NZ). I would guess that the focus from the coaching staff right now is an earlier turn back and setup in the NZ, and I think that has a negative affect on scoring opportunities for everyone. From my eye, that feels like what's been happening lately as well.

I know I'm a Frost guy, and I know I have a certain bias here. I acknowledge he has not been strong offensively over the last 10 games (his defensive numbers have been pretty consistent however). But I also think it's a bit unfair to specifically call out Frost when the entire team has not been good at generating changes as a whole over the last 10 game.


Remember how there was a stretch where I effusively praised the team's evolution towards cross-ice passing? There's been a hard stop on that. Again. I've avoided expressing my disappointment because I'd hate to sound negative. He didn't get in front of the press to whine about it and promise to make it stop, but I'd assume that Tortorella reigned it in in favor of safe, uncomplicated, unrisky north-south hockey as he prefers. That kind of thing will slaughter playmaker productivity.

As you've mentioned, we are gonna get the Tortorella special; as a priority, the end result being that they get outscored overall because you cannot simply hold on for dear life and win. It didn't work with a much better roster and goalie in NY in an era more favorable to such things. It can't work now, even though he is less extreme than he was. Safe is death.

But management does probably adore it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VladDrag

Flyerfan4life

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
35,478
22,244
Richmond BC, Canada
Remember how there was a stretch where I effusively praised the team's evolution towards cross-ice passing? There's been a hard stop on that. Again. I've avoided expressing my disappointment because I'd hate to sound negative. He didn't get in front of the press to whine about it and promise to make it stop, but I'd assume that Tortorella reigned it in in favor of safe, uncomplicated, unrisky north-south hockey as he prefers. That kind of thing will slaughter playmaker productivity.

As you've mentioned, we are gonna get the Tortorella special; as a priority, the end result being that they get outscored overall because you cannot simply hold on for dear life and win. It didn't work with a much better roster and goalie in NY in an era more favorable to such things. It can't work now, even though he is less extreme than he was. Safe is death.

But management does probably adore it.
who was it that said "safe is death in the modern NHL"..


oh yea. 🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,141
170,468
Armored Train
who was it that said "safe is death in the modern NHL"..


oh yea. 🤣🤣🤣

It's often like there's an invisible line drawn up the ice from the opposite goalpost depending on where the puck is, and thou shall not pass across that. It usually slashes chances against because there isn't anything to pick and cleanly move up ice; and it lets dmen engage free of worry about that happening. But it does make scoring a lot harder. Goalies stay on angles.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,141
170,468
Armored Train
And yes, the Flyers are among the top of the league at scoring on the rush! The problem is that the gap in rush attempts between top teams and bottom teams isn't large at all. Nor is the scoring percentage on those chances high enough to produce adequate scoring to cover for the lack of production in all other situations and on the PP.
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,051
159,983
South Jersey
And yes, the Flyers are among the top of the league at scoring on the rush! The problem is that the gap in rush attempts between top teams and bottom teams isn't large at all. Nor is the scoring percentage on those chances high enough to produce adequate scoring to cover for the lack of production in all other situations and on the PP.


You're getting very not positive.
 

VladDrag

Registered User
Feb 6, 2018
6,263
15,985
How does Frost's dip compare to the other forwards? I actually imagine it would be larger, his playstyle seems like it would take a bigger hit from a less aggressive offense.
I just looked at centers - it was taking too long.

This is xGF/60, with a 3-bin rolling average. Laughton, Frost, Couts all basically the same 'decrease' in xGF. Poehling doing some work in the last few games.

Picture1.png


This is xGA. Pretty similar across the board.

Picture1.png
 

usahockey22flyers

2 years away from being 2 years away
Nov 9, 2009
6,347
2,885
Philly
@Beef Invictus this is game 66. They've played 65 up to this point. FYI.



Over the last 10 games, the team as a whole has been shitty offensively, while being awesome defensively. Both their rolling averages for xGF and xGA/60 have dropped over that span. In other words, this team is not producing scoring chances, and are also preventing score chances against.

This is pure speculation, but since they are in a playoff push, I have to imagine that Torts is gonna push what he does best; defensive play. In some of his pressers, Torts has talks about recalibrating when the team 'turns back' (his term he uses to identify when forwards should aggressively pressure on forecheck, and when they should 'turn back' to the backcheck and establish positioning in the NZ). I would guess that the focus from the coaching staff right now is an earlier turn back and setup in the NZ, and I think that has a negative affect on scoring opportunities for everyone. From my eye, that feels like what's been happening lately as well.

I know I'm a Frost guy, and I know I have a certain bias here. I acknowledge he has not been strong offensively over the last 10 games (his defensive numbers have been pretty consistent however). But I also think it's a bit unfair to specifically call out Frost when the entire team has not been good at generating changes as a whole over the last 10 game.
I think the world of Frost, probably my favorite player on the team - need him to drive play
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
25,116
45,796
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
I just looked at centers - it was taking too long.

This is xGF/60, with a 3-bin rolling average. Laughton, Frost, Couts all basically the same 'decrease' in xGF. Poehling doing some work in the last few games.

View attachment 834576

This is xGA. Pretty similar across the board.

View attachment 834578
It's surprising to see how much Frost has fallen off over the course of the season.
 

MiamiScreamingEagles

Global Moderator
Jan 17, 2004
71,906
48,558
TODAY'S GDT SONG:
Another dosage of reality unfortunately with the passing of Eric Carmen. "Go All the Way" is a generational song that arouses the pleasures of young adulthood. Quite the song, one of my all-time favorites that I recently listed as a Desert Island tune; excellent cohesion and vocalist. Instead of mourning his passing, I am celebrating his contributions. Rest in Peace.

 

EdmFlyersfan

Registered User
Feb 20, 2007
4,938
3,288
Edmonton
Get Morin out of retirement. No one left on the blue line.

I was thinking Weinrich...

Brink must have gone to Torts, ripped his shirt off and said, “Let’s go, coach! This is for ice time!”

Maybe he pulled a reverse Torts...when Torts told him he was going to be a scratch and Brink said "I'm not F****ng leaving" and then was put in the lineup.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad