GDT: #62 - 03/02/14 |Boston Bruins @ New York Rangers | 7:00 - NBC SPORTS

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The story of 11-12 was the other team dominating us and Lundqvist bailing us out and us winning, the story of this season is us dominating the other team and the other goalie bailing out their team.
 
Contract disputes shouldn't make a guy forget to connect on a pass. If you're a top line center, you should set up at least 4-5 scoring chances a game by yourself. Nylander did it. Savard did it. Heck even Dubinsky did it when he centered Jagr and Avery.

Nash and Kreider are generating chances on their own.

I think it's time to swap Stepan with Richards.
 
HAHA :)
Where does one get that specific one with Hank on it.
We need some of that down under. ;)

I've tried to order one but i literally can't find one online. I"ve even emailed online shops that swell Swedish products in the US. No luck! I'm dying to own one.

I check Ebay constantly too.
 
What are you talking about? You say Hank should stop a save and you get an army defending him. He hasn't been that good this game.

I know he's not an ECHL goalie. He's the best Rangers goalie of all-time. But he isn't void of criticism where it's due.

I wasn't serious. I'm almost on Nevesis level when it comes to Hank
 
BSeAGywCUAAWtWG.jpg:large

Best post of the evening.
 
Contract disputes shouldn't make a guy forget to connect on a pass. If you're a top line center, you should set up at least 4-5 scoring chances a game by yourself. Nylander did it. Savard did it. Heck even Dubinsky did it when he centered Jagr and Avery.

Nash and Kreider are generating chances on their own.

I think it's time to swap Stepan with Richards.

Agreed again.

I think I've agreed with almost everything you've said tonight. On point, man.
 
Hank doesn't actually use Head and Shoulders, people.

I use Head and Shoulders. I don't look like that. It can't be Head and Shoulders.

I'll find out though. And then I'll profit.
 
Contract disputes shouldn't make a guy forget to connect on a pass. If you're a top line center, you should set up at least 4-5 scoring chances a game by yourself. Nylander did it. Savard did it. Heck even Dubinsky did it when he centered Jagr and Avery.

Nash and Kreider are generating chances on their own.

I think it's time to swap Stepan with Richards.
Exactly. Nash and kreider pretty much play on their own out there which makes it tougher for them because stepan is the guy who suppose to set them up
 
Still anybody's game. the rangers played much better toward the last half of teh 2nd. Just need to play smart and get guys in front of rask
 
I have no faith in this team in the 3rd period. They've been awful in the third this year with the exception of that two week spurt in January.

Miller does look good. He finally figured it out. Don't know if he sticks, but unless he goes on the McDonalds and Chinese Buffet diet this summer, he's gonna make the team full time next year.
 
The Rangers have over a month left. There is no goalie controversy. They will win or lose with Lundqvist.

Win or lose, he is just as responsible as anybody else. He's not above criticism.

Rangers fans used to be able to manage expectations. The Rangers' worst two late season meltdowns were Olympic years.

The Olympics shouldn't be an excuse. The 2010 finalists had half their teams in Vancouver.
 
What I don't get is how when Lundqvist gives up a goal if someone else made a mistake he's automatically absolved according to some. He's our best and highest paid player he should be able to bail him team out once in a while. If you can only make saves when your team doesn't make a mistake you'll be the worst goalie ever.
 
Last edited:
The Rangers are tough but not strong or intimidating. Back to back games where the other team is winning the physical battles.

What is Sather thinking? What does he see?

I think the Rangers are a good deep team who will get destroyed by Boston or Tampa in the Playoffs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad