Probably, but then you have to think that all of Bedard, Carlsson and Fantilli are also not doing as well we thought they should, so none of them are doing anything historic. Point is, Michkov is doing well in the NHL after doing well in the KHL. These other players aren't doing better despite having prior NHL experience or dominating their respective league a season before that.
Hmm, i'm trying to figure out what we disagree on.
My point is that KHL is a weaker league, young players are therefore getting more chances than they did before. We are now seeing a lot of historic seasons from young players in the KHL... This then gets brought up to show how good that player is doing.
I mean, they're having historic seasons.
My point is that it should be taken with a grain of salt. Especially when you try to make comparisions to past players, and try to project how good a player will become.
Will good players still come out of the KHL, yes. Are we seeing a historically good young talents coming from Russia, unlikely IMO.