50 goal seasons for Bedard?

How many 50 goal seasons for Bedard

  • None

    Votes: 31 14.2%
  • 1 season

    Votes: 5 2.3%
  • 2 seasons

    Votes: 17 7.8%
  • 3 seasons

    Votes: 24 11.0%
  • 4 seasons

    Votes: 26 11.9%
  • 5 seasons

    Votes: 23 10.5%
  • 6-7 seasons

    Votes: 42 19.2%
  • 8-9 seasons

    Votes: 19 8.7%
  • 10-14 seasons

    Votes: 6 2.7%
  • 15+ seasons

    Votes: 26 11.9%

  • Total voters
    219
  • Poll closed .

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,637
15,263
Pickering, Ontario
Rookie: Somewhere between 20(bust), 40 (disapoinment), 60(if hes the ONE)

Career: Somewhere between 200 (if hes a bust), 700 (if hes a disapointment), 1000 (if hes the ONE)

I need him to be better than Peak Kane/Mikita by Year 3
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,228
16,575
It's been over 74 since Expansion and over 80 since 1974-75.

But since you are the one that brought up league history, the 82 game season making it easier to surpass 50 goals compared to early days only supports my point.
It sure as shit isn't easier to hit 50 these days as it was in the 80s early 90s. The number of 50+ scorers needs to more than double to get to that level.

Rookie: Somewhere between 20(bust), 40 (disapoinment), 60(if hes the ONE)

Career: Somewhere between 200 (if hes a bust), 700 (if hes a disapointment), 1000 (if hes the ONE)

I need him to be better than Peak Kane/Mikita by Year 3
What disappointments...

1686587428782.png
 

McVespa99

Registered User
May 13, 2007
6,052
2,795
Too much is made of his stature. Legit measured at 5’9.75, 185 pounds. If he has problems they won’t be build-related.
That is not necessarily true. Shorter players often take more head contact. It may be an issue or not. But stepping up to the Nhl as a smaller player can always be a problem. Not saying it will for sure. Its just an extra risk with a smaller player.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,425
20,406
Not enough is being made of this.

Sans Bedard, every other top six forward would be 3rd and 4th liners on other teams.

Must be one of the worst rosters in recent memory
You do know that Free Agency hasn't even happened yet? They have to spend a bunch just to hit the Floor. So we should probably wait until Training Camp to determine if it's one of the worst rosters in recent memory, as right now you're just looking at a Tank Team post-trade deadline and acting like that's the team coming in.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,510
16,411
Vancouver
You do know that Free Agency hasn't even happened yet? They have to spend a bunch just to hit the Floor. So we should probably wait until Training Camp to determine if it's one of the worst rosters in recent memory, as right now you're just looking at a Tank Team post-trade deadline and acting like that's the team coming in.

Not a whole lot in free agency though. ROR and Tarasenko likely want to go to winners, and even if Kane came back he’ll miss most of the season and likely wouldn’t be full strength until the following year. There’s guys like Zucker, Bertuzzi, Nyquist, Tatar, Killorn etc who are decent complementary players, but not really needle movers, and I’d imagine the Hawks would rather not be saddled with UFA deals to guys who will likely suck when they’re trying to compete. I imagine they’ll sign short vet deals to fill holes and potentially use to gain assets at the deadline, but I doubt they’ll be much better next year outside of what Bedard brings himself.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,425
20,406
Not a whole lot in free agency though. ROR and Tarasenko likely want to go to winners, and even if Kane came back he’ll miss most of the season and likely wouldn’t be full strength until the following year. There’s guys like Zucker, Bertuzzi, Nyquist, Tatar, Killorn etc who are decent complementary players, but not really needle movers, and I’d imagine the Hawks would rather not be saddled with UFA deals to guys who will likely suck when they’re trying to compete. I imagine they’ll sign short vet deals to fill holes and potentially use to gain assets at the deadline, but I doubt they’ll be much better next year outside of what Bedard brings himself.
Well yes they likely will not be good, but it's too early to say one of the worst ever.
 

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,518
4,691
Hard to say without knowing what kind of team the Hawks can put together around him. They are a barren wasteland right now, but if Korchinski pans out and he clicks with Nazar and they acquire some other elite playmaker, probably 6 or 7?

Shame they didn't keep that Kirby Dach guy
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
18,281
16,435
Calgary
I said 15+ because I found that answer to be the most funny. If he somehow does it I’ll (hopefully) be back to say how much of a genius I was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadiaPuck

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,637
15,263
Pickering, Ontario
It sure as shit isn't easier to hit 50 these days as it was in the 80s early 90s. The number of 50+ scorers needs to more than double to get to that level.


What disappointments...

View attachment 717209
Outside of Mario and Bobby Hull, bedard should be a better goalscorer than all those guys.

He should end a better player than everyone but those two there

Like Crosby, OV and Mcdavid are
 

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
3,152
3,439
I mean, 10 votes for 15+ seasons of 50 goals. LOL. In his prime and as the Hawks get better and have better talent to surround him I can see him hitting 50. Probably a Brayden Point like trajectory.
Ok there's being conservative, and then there's this.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,337
33,976
People underestimate how hard it is to score 50 goals. It's hard to stay healthy and play at that level for a full 82 games.

I think anywhere from 5-9 is probably a good guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterofGrond

centipede2233

Registered User
Sep 13, 2010
4,732
5,271
I understand tempering expectations because the hawks suck. but ovie rookie year he scored 52 and 106 pts, the next highest on the team was danius effing zubrus with 23 goals and 57 pts, that capitals team might actually be worse. Bedard should get 45 goals in rookie year.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,510
16,411
Vancouver
I understand tempering expectations because the hawks suck. but ovie rookie year he scored 52 and 106 pts, the next highest on the team was danius effing zubrus with 23 goals and 57 pts, that capitals team might actually be worse. Bedard should get 45 goals in rookie year.

That’s a fair point. Crosby also put up big point totals with a brutal roster that year and McDavid likely would have with a healthy rookie year. True elites seem to get their numbers regardless for the most part. I think it depends a lot on whether he can consistently create space for himself as a rookie or not. Because his team won’t do it for him.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,674
9,893
He isn't scoring 50 in his rookie season with that lineup in Chicago.

Perhaps.

On the other hand, Bedard is the type of talent who will bend whoever is around him to his will.

As always, feel free to revisit this during the season. And I’m not talking about within the opening month when most of the elite “generational” are adjusting to the pros and have started “slow”.

If he’s healthy and the calendar is turning to 2024 (roughly 35 games into the season) and he hasn’t potted at least 20 goals, I’ll be fairly surprised and fall in line that he won’t hit 50 in his rookie campaign.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,228
16,575
People underestimate how hard it is to score 50 goals. It's hard to stay healthy and play at that level for a full 82 games.

I think anywhere from 5-9 is probably a good guess.
I love the first line juxtaposed against the second line.

This is the list of players that have scored 50+ 5 or more times. The only active player I'd feel even remotely comfortable adding to this list is Draisaitl with his 3 current 50+ seasons. McDavid, Pasta, Matthews all only have 1 so far. They've already wasted too many opportunities to make it to 5, IMO.

1686764831698.png
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,337
33,976
I love the first line juxtaposed against the second line.

This is the list of players that have scored 50+ 5 or more times. The only active player I'd feel even remotely comfortable adding to this list is Draisaitl with his 3 current 50+ seasons. McDavid, Pasta, Matthews all only have 1 so far. They've already wasted too many opportunities to make it to 5, IMO.

View attachment 717980
Yeah, but scoring is up, and he's not likely to run into covid. Matthews probably lost 2 50 goal seasons because of covid.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,228
16,575
Yeah, but scoring is up, and he's not likely to run into covid. Matthews probably lost 2 50 goal seasons because of covid.
It's not up near enough. There were 9 50 goal scorers over the last two seasons. That's single season numbers from the 80s early 90s.

There are a great many things that can interrupt someone's accumulation of 50 goal seasons. To predict that the next 20 years are any more stable and high scoring than any other 20 year stretch in NHL history is bold.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,337
33,976
It's not up near enough. There were 9 50 goal scorers over the last two seasons. That's single season numbers from the 80s early 90s.

There are a great many things that can interrupt someone's accumulation of 50 goal seasons. To predict that the next 20 years are any more stable and high scoring than any other 20 year stretch in NHL history is bold.
Draisaitl already has 3, probably ends up with 4-6
Matthews should have 3, will probably have another 2-3 more
Ovechkin has 9
Stamkos has 2

Bedard has a ton of talent. I think it's reasonable to think he could reach 5+ 50 goal seasons, but no more than 9.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad