Megustaelhockey
"I like hockey" in Spanish
- Apr 29, 2011
- 23,461
- 17,607
1 for 4 on the PP so far.
That clip, in reality, is fine. It's the fact that the Rangers are whiffing on some really prime chances that is starting to frustrate people.
1 for 4 on the PP so far.
Gaboriks 115 goals and two 40+ Goal seasons would be welcome.
Sry, not good enough for Canada
seriously, if McD could hit the net he'd have the Norris sewn up already
Boyle gets the puck, shovels it back behind the net to Stralman, who has one hand on the stick, picking up his glove, so one-hand shovels it to Del Zotto, who ices it. Typical Rangers chain of events.
Alright, St Louis just scored his fourth of the night.
Alright, St Louis just scored his fourth of the night.
Alright, St Louis just scored his fourth of the night.
While I love Gaborik, Nash is a much more dynamic player in my opinion.
We've squandered many quality scoring chances in this game.
What does that mean though? Healthy Gaborik is simply a better, more productive, higher scoring offensive player. Has been his entire career. Dynamic = flashier? That's all it is. Nash is a flashier offensive player but he's factually less effective. He just makes more highlight reels. He may be more talented, but it doesn't matter because he doesn't utilize that talent effectively and can't play with any line mates effectively.
Jesus christ break up the Kreider-Stepan-Nash line PLEASE.
I agree Nash is more of a highlight reel player. Gaborik had his own issues but production wise he was more reliable.What does that mean though? Healthy Gaborik is simply a better, more productive, higher scoring offensive player. Has been his entire career. Dynamic = flashier? That's all it is. Nash is a flashier offensive player but he's factually less effective. He just makes more highlight reels. He may be more talented, but it doesn't matter because he doesn't utilize that talent effectively and can't play with any line mates effectively.
how did he not make team canada![]()