GDT: #50 - 01/18/14 | New York Rangers @ Ottawa Senators | 2:00 PM - MSG, NHL NET

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Boyle gets the puck, shovels it back behind the net to Stralman, who has one hand on the stick, picking up his glove, so one-hand shovels it to Del Zotto, who ices it. Typical Rangers chain of events.
 
Boyle gets the puck, shovels it back behind the net to Stralman, who has one hand on the stick, picking up his glove, so one-hand shovels it to Del Zotto, who ices it. Typical Rangers chain of events.

it sounds like a circus with Boyle as the clown :sarcasm:
 
While I love Gaborik, Nash is a much more dynamic player in my opinion.

What does that mean though? Healthy Gaborik is simply a better, more productive, higher scoring offensive player. Has been his entire career. Dynamic = flashier? That's all it is. Nash is a flashier offensive player but he's factually less effective. He just makes more highlight reels. He may be more talented, but it doesn't matter because he doesn't utilize that talent effectively and can't play with any line mates effectively.
 
What does that mean though? Healthy Gaborik is simply a better, more productive, higher scoring offensive player. Has been his entire career. Dynamic = flashier? That's all it is. Nash is a flashier offensive player but he's factually less effective. He just makes more highlight reels. He may be more talented, but it doesn't matter because he doesn't utilize that talent effectively and can't play with any line mates effectively.

Except you're thinking of the 11-12 Gaborik.
 
What does that mean though? Healthy Gaborik is simply a better, more productive, higher scoring offensive player. Has been his entire career. Dynamic = flashier? That's all it is. Nash is a flashier offensive player but he's factually less effective. He just makes more highlight reels. He may be more talented, but it doesn't matter because he doesn't utilize that talent effectively and can't play with any line mates effectively.
I agree Nash is more of a highlight reel player. Gaborik had his own issues but production wise he was more reliable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad