Joe Zanussi
Registered User
- Jul 15, 2011
- 1,569
- 494
I don’t know if there’s anything that I hate more than the “we could ice two medal teams” stuff. It’s very possible that the Finns beat the US or Canada’s number one team.
18 Vlasics and another pair of Vlasics in net we'll have this thing wrapped up.
Mind boggling to leave Thompson and Caufield at home. The entire point of this tournament is to get experience for young guys before 2026, why would you bring vets who are pretty unlikely to make an Olympic roster? Why would you not take the best available players and just try to find a scheme that works around them?
I would take Vlasic over both Hughes brothers in a tournament like this. But with the way Luke has played this year, he should absolutely be in the conversation to make this team.
Slavin - Fox
Hughes - Faber
Vlasic - McAvoy
McDonagh or Hughes
That's the group I would go with.
it's a mickey mouse tournament. it's just clearly a precursor to the Olympics, essentially serving as a tune-up/marketing tool because the NHL hasn't been involved in best-on-best international hockey tournament since 2016, and hasn't been to the Olympics in over a decade. Smarter thing to do is to give roster spots to people who will actually be on the 26 roster. I highly doubt team USA is going to take any of the three veterans in 2026.Because that's not the entire point of the tournament, nor are Thompson and Caufield definitive members of the best available 13 forwards.
This is the team I'd choose as of now. A gold medal favorite no doubt, although Canada is the team to beat in best-on-best until someone else proves otherwise. Nevertheless, if this team doesn't win gold, it's a USAH failure. I look forward to how USAH will probably do something inevitably stupid and overthink this.
Forwards (x13):Forwards:
Kyle Connor - Jack Eichel - Matt Boldy
J.T. Miller - Auston Matthews - Matthew Tkachuk
Jack Hughes - Dylan Larkin - Alex Tuch
Brady Tkachuk - Vincent Trocheck - Jake Guentzel
Brock Nelson
Defense (x7):
Quinn Hughes - Charlie McAvoy
Jaccob Slavin - Adam Fox
Ryan McDonagh - Brock Faber
John Carlson
Goalies (x3):
Connor Hellebuyck
Jake Oettinger
Jeremy Swayman
Defense:
There is no need to go small here with the rest of the picks. Take the most elite small guy (Hughes) and the most proven clutch performer (Guentzel) and stop. If Kane was still prime he'd be here too. And I think USAH in their hearts wants him here, but it's too much of a stretch. There are plenty of USAH teams in the past that would have needed more small guys like Keller, Caulfield, Debrincat, etc. either but this isn't one of those teams. For now, I'm including Miller because if he's back in time and game shape, he has to be on the team. By all reports, it seems like that's the plan, so name him now, and if he remains out, replace him later. If we do lose him, it's a huge loss. Other forwards I think are probably in some consideration: Kreider, Thompson, Boeser, Robertson, Caufield, Keller, Debrincat, Cooley, Garland, Mittelstadt, Rust, etc. Kreider, Boeser, and Robertson were all guys I've had on prior iterations of my team and not now. I just don't see how you can justify Roberston if he's not playing at his best given his heavy feet. Boeser would normally make our teams but we have plenty of goal-scoring and can choose more versatile guys over him. Kreider is the one who I think should be most likely to still make it. Yes, he's had a slow start, but he's got size, and speed, can play the PK and PP, and can fit into almost any role you need. For now, I've gone center heavy (8 guys who could play center) but ideally, you don't have Hughes or Thompson do it, and versatile guys are key and we have plenty. I fully expect at least one veteran will make it and cause a lot of people to cry foul. I have Nelson as that guy (although he's a worthy selection). I just hope it's a guy like Nelson and not someone more off-the-wall like Copp, Hartman, Rust, etc. Nothing will top the off-the-wall picks of the past, right? Right?
Goalies:
The choices are hard here. Faber and Slavin should be locks. And after that, you can go so many different ways. There are a lot of other guys you can make cases for to be on this team: Werenski, Hanifin, Pionk, Sanderson, Vlasic, Pesce, etc. I'd be pretty surprised if there's not at least 1 veteran of prior "top" USAH squads here. Carlson and McDonagh are the clear standout options in that category. Right now I have both here because they're both top players, and I think USAH loves deferring to experience. McDonagh can anchor a PK tandem and bring a steady veteran presence to a young pair partner. And Carlson because he's a veteran, well-rounded, and a top 4 American RHD. Werenski is hard to leave off. I went back and forth with putting him over McDonagh or Carlson. That's probably more likely to happen. But I suspect USAH may lean toward the veteran, experienced, defensive defenseman over the highly offensive rover in Werenski because Guerin has talked endlessly about certain players making it for certain roles, the defense isn't hurting for offensive weapons, and if you have Werenski playing a regular shift, you want him with a steady stay-at-home guy like if we had a right-handed Slavin (maybe Pesce if he had more time to rebound). That said, I think a Werenski - Faber third pairing is a strong pairing, too, and I wouldn't be mad if that happens. Hanifin and Sanderson have been boutique picks in a lot of mocks I've seen (including some of my prior iterations), but I question whether they'll get the nod. They are both very similar players and one of them could easily find their way here. Neither is a PP guy at this level nor are they top PK options, either -- at least yet. They're well-rounded players no doubt, but this team isn't hurting for the well-rounded defenseman, and I suspect the staff is going to lean more toward guys who excel at a specific role a la defensively (Slavin, McDonagh) or offensively (Werenski).
- Helle and Otter are the most obvious of obvious picks.
- It's too bad Demko has been out so long and Swayman is having a very slow start after his holdout, otherwise, we'd have four #1 options in the net.
- It doesn't matter who we choose for the #3 role, but I'd go with the young #1 (Swayman) just for the experience.
The US defense is better than Canada's, and I don't think it's particularly close. Canada's got some good puck movers, but really lack solid shut down dmen.Canada is the gold medal favorite. Goaltending is the only position they are weaker at.
Leaving Thompson off is so dumb. He's averaged a 43 goal 83 point pace the last 3 years playing for the Buffalo Sabres and we couldn't find a spot for him?
Among Americans, only Matthews has scored goals at a higher rate in that span.
Oh yeah, and he's 6'6, can play C and W, has a bomb of a left circle one timer, and is an excellent skater with soft hands. And his all around game has significantly improved.
Guy is the closest stylistic comp to Mario Lemieux the US has ever produced and we decided we need Trocheck instead?!?
The US defense is better than Canada's, and I don't think it's particularly close. Canada's got some good puck movers, but really lack solid shut down dmen.
Centers
Canada >> USA
Wingers
USA ~ Canada
Defense
USA >> Canada
Goaltending
USA >>>> Canada
There's been what, 4 best on bests since then? One of which we lost in the final in overtime on Canadian soil? Another we lost to Canada by 1 in the semis?You're 2/4. The last time the US won a best on best was 1996. Benedict Arnold from North Van scored the winner, Fred Flinstone ran the Canadian team while Mario, Patrick and Kariya didn't play.
I'd probably call the skaters a draw, though leaving off Thompson certainly helps Canada. Canada is definitely better up front, USA is definitely better on D.Canada has better skaters.
I think that goes without saying. USA has at least 7 goalies better than Canada's best.US has the goaltending.
Canadas defense is not as good as it has been in the past.Canada is the gold medal favorite. Goaltending is the only position they are weaker at.
Shouldn't even be called a tournament, should be called a series.it's a mickey mouse tournament. it's just clearly a precursor to the Olympics, essentially serving as a tune-up/marketing tool because the NHL hasn't been involved in best-on-best international hockey tournament since 2016, and hasn't been to the Olympics in over a decade. Smarter thing to do is to give roster spots to people who will actually be on the 26 roster. I highly doubt team USA is going to take any of the three veterans in 2026.
I'm not saying that whatsoever. My reason is to evaluate more players and expand this to incorporate the entire O6.I don’t know if there’s anything that I hate more than the “we could ice two medal teams” stuff. It’s very possible that the Finns beat the US or Canada’s number one team.
Canada is the gold medal favorite. Goaltending is the only position they are weaker at.
Once the two countries are officially named, I'm confident they will be comparable.Canada is the gold medal favorite. Goaltending is the only position they are weaker at.
Honestly can't see Nelson on this team ahead of Thompson. You have a couple of extra wingers who are center so why the need for him? Thompson is a mire impact ful player and your leaving him off? Not a swipe at Nelson who is a very good player and if you went 14F I can see him making it.According to this article: Patrik Laine expected to make Team Finland, Cole Caufield appears set to miss out on Team USA | TSN
Caufield and Thompson are out and Kreider, Trocheck, and Nelson are in. I can see Jack Hughes and J.T. Miller on the wing with Matthews, Eichel, and Larkin the top three centers and Nelson/Trocheck the 4th line center. Perhaps one of them is the 13th forward. Maybe the forward group looks like this:
M. Tkachuk/Eichel/Boldy
B. Tkachuk/Matthews/J. Hughes
Connor/Larkin/Miller
Kreider/Nelson/Guentzel
Trocheck
That would mean no Tuch. It makes me wonder if Connor is at risk.
Thats a good team. I honestly dont have any issues. Caufield is a no for me. Thompson you could have fit in there instead of Nelson or Kreider but Im fine with it. I think they have a role for Nelson lined up.According to this article: Patrik Laine expected to make Team Finland, Cole Caufield appears set to miss out on Team USA | TSN
Caufield and Thompson are out and Kreider, Trocheck, and Nelson are in. I can see Jack Hughes and J.T. Miller on the wing with Matthews, Eichel, and Larkin the top three centers and Nelson/Trocheck the 4th line center. Perhaps one of them is the 13th forward. Maybe the forward group looks like this:
M. Tkachuk/Eichel/Boldy
B. Tkachuk/Matthews/J. Hughes
Connor/Larkin/Miller
Kreider/Nelson/Guentzel
Trocheck
That would mean no Tuch. It makes me wonder if Connor is at risk.