World Cup: 4 Nations Tournament- Team USA (2025)

mphmiles

Registered User
Jan 1, 2017
741
1,324
Was just listening to a finnish podcast where Kimmo Timonen came up with a line of Tkachuk - Matthews - Tkachuk and instantly thought that Eichel would sound better with the brothers, seems like im not alone.

Strongly agree with you that Jack Hughes should play wing, and strongly disagree with you that Kyle Connor is 13th forward, just swap jack to RW and replace Boeser or Keller with Connor. To me it's very obvious that Connor is the best out of Connor/Keller/Boeser.

On D: I would pick Pesce or Sanderson over Carlson.

Edit:

Hughes - Matthews - Connor
Tkachuk - Eichel - Tkachuk
Guentzel - Larkin - Keller
Robertson - Trocheck - Boldy

Replaced Miller with Larkin because not sure if hes available, any good?
Larkin at wing solves some deployment issues IMO. Of the projected wingers here, none of them PK more than a little here and there, so Larkin at wing gives you one. (And the team would likely still need someone else like Miller, Kreider, or Tuch who also PK's) With the forwards projected here, you're looking at 3 C's all playing PK along with one winger who doesn't really have any experience there, which would be a bit of a mess.

If we're worried about Hughes and face-offs, you could pair him with Miller or Larkin, have Hughes play C, and just have one of them take the face-offs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gritdash60

gritdash60

Registered User
Aug 9, 2022
1,519
1,554
Behind the net
Larkin at wing solves some deployment issues IMO. Of the projected wingers here, none of them PK more than a little here and there, so Larkin at wing gives you one. (And the team would likely still need someone else like Miller, Kreider, or Tuch who also PK's) With the forwards projected here, you're looking at 3 C's all playing PK along with one winger who doesn't really have any experience there, which would be a bit of a mess.

If we're worried about Hughes and face-offs, you could pair him with Miller or Larkin, have Hughes play C, and just have one of them take the face-offs.
Yeah well i did put Larkin as 3C, also if lets say Hughes and Larkin were on the same line i think Larkin would do better as C than Hughes and also i think Hughes would be a better winger than Larkin. Playing Larkin on the wing is something i would love to see if he doesn't get a C spot, but somehow i feel like hes either 3C or 4C or not on the team (and im a Wings fanboy).

Miller will be a big loss if isn't available, which is the reason i edited the roster to have Larkin in the first place to the roster posted by MarkT. Now that you mentioned Tuch he might be a better replacement for Miller than Larkin. Good point about the PK.
 

MarkT

Heretic
Nov 11, 2017
4,046
4,596
Was just listening to a finnish podcast where Kimmo Timonen came up with a line of Tkachuk - Matthews - Tkachuk and instantly thought that Eichel would sound better with the brothers, seems like im not alone.

Strongly agree with you that Jack Hughes should play wing, and strongly disagree with you that Kyle Connor is 13th forward, just swap jack to RW and replace Boeser or Keller with Connor. To me it's very obvious that Connor is the best out of Connor/Keller/Boeser.

On D: I would pick Pesce or Sanderson over Carlson.

Edit:

Hughes - Matthews - Connor
Tkachuk - Eichel - Tkachuk
Guentzel - Larkin - Keller
Robertson - Trocheck - Boldy

Replaced Miller with Larkin because not sure if hes available, any good?

Yeah I'm flexible with the wings for sure. Those lines look fine to me. Also, if Miller isn't available Larkin definitely gets his spot. I really like your third line there too.

As for D, the reason I went with Carlson over other options is his veteran experience and ability to play big minutes. Also, he's a righty, which is why he's on the team for me rather than Sanderson (who is #7 on my list ahead of McAvoy).
 

Northerner

Registered User
Feb 23, 2017
1,751
415
Lol you people (oops, I said YOU PEOPLE 😲 LOL) want this team super young. What would be the average age of some your prospective lineups? 😆

I say a nice, big, gritty, veteran line of Thompson, Nelson and Lee on that 4th line would go a long way.
 

MNRube

Registered User
Oct 20, 2013
6,715
3,836
M.Tkachuk-Eichel-Boldy
B.Tkachuk-Matthews-****
Hughes-Larkin-Connor
Guentzel-Thompson-Tuch
**** Caufield, Robertson, DeBrincat, Keller the options to take what was JT Miller’s spot. I’d probably go with Keller.

Slavin-Fox
Hughes-Faber
Werenski-McAvoy/Carlson

*Little worried about the fact our Top 2 RHD in Fox & McAvoy are struggling.

*I think you split up the Tkachuks at first and put them together if we find a grinding game below the dots is effective in this format.
 

SillyRabbit

Trix Are For Kids
Jan 3, 2006
9,056
9,083
I was pencilling in McAvoy to partner with Hughes for a while now but really feels like Faber has supplanted him.

McAvoy has not played well.

US has two #1 defensive pairings in contrast to Canada where Toews-Makar is clearly #1.

Wonder how they'll end up deploying the pairings and whether they'll pair Hughes and Fox for PP1.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad