4 NATIONS QUARTER CENTURY TEAM

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Who would win from the 4 Nations playing now if its quarter century team players are playing???


  • Total voters
    16

PhilJets

Winnipeg is Good
Jun 24, 2012
10,602
8,749
Somewhere nice
Who would win in the same format tournament amongst the 4 Nations using QUARTER CENTURY players.
IMPORTANT!: ASSUMING The players in the line up are at their PEAK YEAR.


Canada.jpg


CANADA
FIRST Team

  • Crosby
  • MacKinnon
  • McDavid
  • Doughty
  • Pronger
  • Brodeur
SECOND Team
  • Iginla
  • Stamkos
  • Thornton
  • Keith
  • Neidemayer
  • Fleury



USA.jpg




U.S.A.
FIRST Team

  • Kane
  • Matthews
  • Pavelski
  • Fox
  • Hughes
  • Quick
SECOND Team
  • Brown
  • Gaudreau
  • Tkachuk
  • Carlson
  • Suter
  • Thomas

finland.jpg



FINLAND
FIRST Team

  • Barkov
  • Rantanen
  • Selanne
  • Salo
  • Timonen
  • Rinne
SECOND Team
  • Pilppula
  • Jokinen
  • Koivu
  • Heiskanen
  • Maata
  • Rask

sweden.jpg



SWEDEN
FIRST Team

  • Backstrom
  • Sedin
  • Sedin
  • Karlsson
  • Lidstrom
  • Lundqvist
SECOND Team
  • Forsberg
  • Sundin
  • Zetterberg
  • Hedman
  • kronwall
  • Markstrom

Who would win the Quarter Century 4-NATIONS CUP.
If you are allowed to swap 1 player for any team, who would you swap in from this first quarter century player?


THANKS
 
  • Like
Reactions: wraithsonwings
Ok since i made this thread i will vote first.
Canada strongest in net and all around.
BUT that Sweden team is pretty good also, they will give Canada the run for its money.

I think Finland is the weakest team again. Imagine if Selanne wasn't on that team also.

Got nothing to swap: Maybe Laine ;) :D never mind :laugh:
 
US and Finland have their 1st Team and 2nd Team goalies mixed up. MAF shouldn't even be on Team Canada (Luongo's better than both Brodeur and MAF).

What's the selection criteria here? Because Mario Lemieux didn't retire until 2006 and Patrick Roy retired in 2003...but I guess Canada's already running away with it without adding 2 GOATs at their peak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Romang67
US and Finland have their 1st Team and 2nd Team goalies mixed up. MAF shouldn't even be on Team Canada (Luongo's better than both Brodeur and MAF).

What's the selection criteria here? Because Mario Lemieux didn't retire until 2006 and Patrick Roy retired in 2003...but I guess Canada's already running away with it without adding 2 GOATs at their peak.
I stopped reading when I saw Mikko Koivu on there, but not Saku, because I could have swore Saku and Teemu dominated international play. And Filppula? WTF? Mikael Granlund had a better Olympic showing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gm0ney
Thomas was an absolute nut job (might still be), but his peak is up there with the likes of Hasek, Brodeur and Roy. The only thing Quick has over him is longevity. Flip those two. I'm also a little confused about what constitutes 1st and 2nd team for Sweden, because the forwards on the 2nd team are better than the ones on the 1st team (Sundin is arguable, except not for Tre Kronor, where he's one of the best performers ever).

In fact, I'd say the 1st team for Sweden should be Forsberg-Sundin-Alfredsson-Lidström-Karlsson-Lundqvist.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad