HF Habs: 4 Nations Face-Off: Canada beats Finland 5-3; advances to Finals vs USA

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Serge & Yvan greet Jake Guetzel. Well deserved 1st star.

1000008398.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Be a Hab
That game was like olympics in Turin. Grab all the old timers like Sakic, Rob Blake, Pronger. Everybody over 30 years old. They should have younger player even if they had a worse predigree
 
Was anyone good upfront other than McDavid/Point? I love Reinhart's game but he looks extremely out of place on his line. Our bottom 6 is very meh other than Point. Crosby had a tough one too but he just isn't a winger.

Harley was great though. I liked him
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
The concept of team is higher with the US. Canada has a bunch of great solo artists.
U.s. better depth.

Difference in this game was the Crosby turnover...

we're missing Makar, Theodore, Pietrangelo, half our starting blue line. U.s. only missing Hughes. I think Makar and Theodore could have perhaps made a difference creating openings from the back end...

I'm glad the lines were switched up...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
we have no scoring depth on a best on best tourney. we didn't score on our pp and we didn't look like the best team on the ice. we had the best player, probably 2 players, but the U.S. goalie and d played better.

Really would be nice when down a goal to be able to toss out some young talent instead of hagel/marchand type of guys. Marchand is done. great career and a hell of a player, but he looks like a slightly more talented gallagher on the ice.

it's embarrassing scheifele isn't on this team. he's better than half the line up, and he brings the same skill set as the bottom 6 guys. makes zero sense.
 
U.s. better depth.

Difference in this game was the Crosby turnover...

we're missing Makar, Theodore, Pietrangelo, half our starting blue line. U.s. only missing Hughes. I think Makar and Theodore could have perhaps made a difference creating openings from the back end...

I'm glad the lines were switched up...
Better depth. Maybe because of the choices. Suzuki is better than Larkin for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad