GDT: #32 - 12/15/17 | kings @ RANGERS | 7:00 - MSG, NHLN

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The concept of Shattenkirk the PP specialist and offensive spark on defense is nice. It would be nice if our top pairing was saddled with Nick Holden. Our bottom pairing weighted down with Staal.

Gorton needs to do his homework and figure out what a good defenseman really is. Staal, Kampfer, and Holden are not it.
 
It's not too hard to see what would make Henrik pissed off there. No need to blame him for having emotion for the right reason.
 
Legit question, how was that Hanks fault?
I didn't say that was Henriks fault. Id be a little careful yelling at people for making mistakes if i was letting in a softie every game though.
 
And it's non sense. Analytics don't tell everything. Every game there is a page dedicated to a huge defensive error Shattenkirk makes. He doesn't pass the eye test on a routine basis. But let's pat him on the back for secondary PP assists.
nH7qg1z.gif
 
What? So it's now wrong to say that Shattenkirk's offensive ability outweighs his defensive liability?

Because that's the truth.

That's an entirely different argument than "Shattenkirk is really good at offense, therefore he's good at defense". That play was a perfect example of how and why "defensive defenseman" still have a role in hockey.

I get on Shattenkirk for not making "hard" defensive plays. That's a perfect example there. Two weak defensive efforts on the same play.
 
OK guys, that was a really bad defensive play, and Shattenkirk has not been good enough this season, but lets hold off on the PP specialist shit.
 
The concept of Shattenkirk the PP specialist and offensive spark on defense is nice. It would be nice if our top pairing was saddled with Nick Holden. Our bottom pairing weighted down with Staal.

Gorton needs to do his homework and figure out what a good defenseman really is. Staal, Kampfer, and Holden are not it.

Shattenkirk is on for another goal against and it's all Staal, Kampfer and Holden's fault

Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vinny DeAngelo
I didn't say that was Henriks fault. Id be a little careful yelling at people for making mistakes if i was letting in a softie every game though.

..... AND you can count on Shattenkirk to make 1-2 bone headed defensive plays per game. I guess it evens out.
 
That's an entirely different argument than "Shattenkirk is really good at offense, therefore he's good at defense". That play was a perfect example of how and why "defensive defenseman" still have a role in hockey.

I get on Shattenkirk for not making "hard" defensive plays. That's a perfect example there. Two weak defensive efforts on the same play.

Yeah. He would need 100% possession in order to not get bullied by Mr. Glass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad