- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,928
- 22,850
It goes by how we're playing as well.
Moneypuck has us 3rd in Power Rankings... yeah, I dont know.. so we're anticipated to win a lot of our games
That would make more sense.
Dom Luszczyszyn at the Athletic always posts stuff based on his advanced stats model, and he actually has us being better the rest of the way than we have been so far.
Rangers
First half schedule strength: 0.510 (22nd)
Second half schedule strength: 0.494 (13th)
You may not realize this, but the Rangers’ goal differential this season is two less than the Capitals and one more than the Bruins. Granted, that’s buoyed plenty by a 9-0 victory, but teams can’t control how and when the goals come, and it was a bit unlucky for New York they all came at once. Sequencing has a huge effect on the standings, as many focus on wins and losses even though goal differential tells a more accurate story. Having the league’s third-worst record in one-goal games is really hurting the Rangers who look more like an above-average team than a below-average one. Their collection of strong shooters to go along with elite goaltending deserve a much better fate than their current pace. Igor Shesterkin should be back soon and Mika Zibanejad is beginning to heat up. It likely won’t be enough to make the playoffs, but a strong second half seems very likely for the Rangers.