No, I definitely don't have you confused with someone else. Here's the quote where you said Gretzky wasn't truly generational as it pertained to your argument (the 'he' is Gretz). Post 337,
full link
View attachment 917287
And no, I'm not using semantics to distract. As I explained, I've been bringing attention to the fact that YOU POSTED IN THIS THREAD AFTER I GOT HERE which means I didn't follow you here lmao. And no, I'm not assuming you searched my post history (that would be stalker-ish), the messages are right here in this thread on page 1, usually people read a few prior messages in a thread before posting in it, it's not unreasonable for me to expect you to do so especially since I've done the OPPOSITE of distracting ie mentioned multiple times that I didn't follow you here. Speaking of which the word "follow" doesn't mean quoting someone while bringing up a tangential topic, that's not semantics that's grade school level english. Yes I responded to you, no I did not follow you, the two things are not the same. This shouldn't be this hard lmao.
Also wasn't the one who initially brought up Bedard YOU are the one who did that, and you keep bringing him up for some reason. As I literally just explained in the post you responded to (incl full context), I have zero desire to discuss Connor Bedard in a thread that's not about Connor Bedard.
What are you even arguing, and how are you coming up with these ridiculous accusations / iines of attack? They literally have no basis in anything lmao.
***
Back to the thread topic, for the OP, both Chychrun and Dougie Hamilton make sense to include as possible options in the poll, probably Thomas Harley also now that I think about it. Clearly Connor Bedard is not a defenseman so shouldn't be listed as an option lmao. Thx for the poll, curious to see if Makar ends up running away with this