Oh look more semantics.
Keep deflecting.
You went out of your way to quote me to bring in logic from another thread because
you are salty about my posts in that thread.
I tried to let you have the last word but you keep trying to stir up the debate again.
Let's just end this and return to a
simpler time where we actually agreed on something
I'm sorry bro. You seem incredibly confused, much moreso than I thought initially. To be fair it's hard to recognize tone in writing (and I haven't made my tone obvious, which is my fault I suppose), so I guess it's not that unexpected. But after sleeping on this, I think it's worth spending some time clearing up some things.
First, I'm not salty at any of your posts. Actually I find the discussions we're having incredibly amusing. What you tried to argue in last thread might require more nuance to explain, but your main claim was based around repeated arguments that Gordie Howe wasn't truly generational. And after a different poster called you out on this, you moved the goalposts and telegraphed that you were about to declare that Wayne wasn't truly generational either, at least as it pertained to the nonsensical 'every generational player' claim you were making. Put a different way, you tried to convince people that Gordie (and later, Wayne) weren't truly generational, and you did this in a
hockey forum. Who wouldn't find that amusing? And no, I'm not trying to stir up that debate, I'm just clowning / poking fun at your logic, it's not the same thing. If I wanted to stir that argument up again, I'd reply to your posts
in that thread like any sane person would do.
Then you have your 'contributions' in this thread. You've spent multiple posts claiming I followed you here, when everyone can look back a single page and see that I made multiple posts in this thread before you even got here. So anyone can see your repeated claim that I followed you here is straight up nonsense. Now you're accusing me of trying to deflect when I'm quite literally doing the
opposite -- I've spent multiple posts bringing
attention to your repeated nonsense claim, not the other way around. Why would anyone claim for multiple posts I followed them somewhere, which is so verifiably false? I'm chuckling at the absurdity as I write this.
Lastly in this last message you claimed you 'tried to let [me] have the last word' in a message you posted 4 minutes after mine. 4 minutes! I almost spit out my salad when I saw the timing on your post. If you were really trying to let me have the last word... should've been able to hold out for longer than 4 minutes, no? lmao.
***
Anyway to be clear I've been laughing this whole time, no salt involved. I'm in the middle watching the office rn, this discussion is just as funny as anything from Michael Scott or Dwight. Thanks for providing amusement, much appreciated over here.