JD123
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2013
- 474
- 0
Do we really believe that Nash-Richards-Gaborik is a better top line then the Hags-Step-Nash line???
Only positive I can see is that maybe Gaborik gets going, but i'm not holding my breath on that one.
See so many negatives. Who will go into the corners and get the puck? ISn't Nash more of a natural on the right wing? Why can't we just have Nash, Gaborik and Cally on three different lines and our top 3 right wings?
I don't and never liked front loading all of our "best" players on one line. Balance and rolling 3-4 lines constantly is how you win in todays NHL.
Only positive I can see is that maybe Gaborik gets going, but i'm not holding my breath on that one.
See so many negatives. Who will go into the corners and get the puck? ISn't Nash more of a natural on the right wing? Why can't we just have Nash, Gaborik and Cally on three different lines and our top 3 right wings?
I don't and never liked front loading all of our "best" players on one line. Balance and rolling 3-4 lines constantly is how you win in todays NHL.