LoofahThe most important question of the draft
will it be Loofsie or Loofer ?
LoofahThe most important question of the draft
will it be Loofsie or Loofer ?
Sponge-Bob.The most important question of the draft
will it be Loofsie or Loofer ?
Lou had nice article on him today: In The Slot: Neighbours focused on making Blues roster as 19-year-oldGot to like that out of a guy trying to make good.
Lou had nice article on him today: In The Slot: Neighbours focused on making Blues roster as 19-year-old
Neighbors making the team out of camp would be crazy. But, some nice youth movement would also be cool. Neighbors and Kostin shoring up the bottom 6 LW.
Unless he plays absolutely outstanding hockey, he has no chance to make the team out of camp. We are just too deep at forward right now.
Perron - RoR - Buchnevich
Saad - Schenn - Tarasenko
Sanford - Thomas - Kyrou
Barby - Sunny -Bozak
Who do you push out of that group? I guess Sanford is the weak link, but that would be crazy for a 19 year old non-blue-chipper to prove in camp he is better than a 26 year old who has paced 40 points in a season and 30 over his whole career. Sanford gets a huge benefit of the doubt over Neighbours. Even if he does outshine Sanford, then he has to beat out Kostin gunning for that spot as well. There is absolutely no way you push anyone else to the press box in favour of a non-blue-chip kid. Maybe if Sunny is hurt, he wins out over Kostin, but that would also be tough given Kostin's momentum from the KHL last year.
Sunny is most likely on ltir at the beginning of the year Opening a stop for Kostin. Neighbors making it is a reach, yes, but totally throwing it out of the door before camp even starts?Unless he plays absolutely outstanding hockey, he has no chance to make the team out of camp. We are just too deep at forward right now.
Perron - RoR - Buchnevich
Saad - Schenn - Tarasenko
Sanford - Thomas - Kyrou
Barby - Sunny -Bozak
Who do you push out of that group? I guess Sanford is the weak link, but that would be crazy for a 19 year old non-blue-chipper to prove in camp he is better than a 26 year old who has paced 40 points in a season and 30 over his whole career. Sanford gets a huge benefit of the doubt over Neighbours. Even if he does outshine Sanford, then he has to beat out Kostin gunning for that spot as well. There is absolutely no way you push anyone else to the press box in favour of a non-blue-chip kid. Maybe if Sunny is hurt, he wins out over Kostin, but that would also be tough given Kostin's momentum from the KHL last year.
Sunny is most likely on ltir at the beginning of the year Opening a stop for Kostin. Neighbors making it is a reach, yes, but totally throwing it out of the door before camp even starts?
First, no clue why you keep calling him non-blue chip. You're selling him way short. He was first round pick, took huge step last year, and he has apparently gotten bigger, faster, and improved his shot. Now maybe he isn't ready or isn't that good, but he is arguably top forward prospect in organization.Unless he plays absolutely outstanding hockey, he has no chance to make the team out of camp. We are just too deep at forward right now.
Perron - RoR - Buchnevich
Saad - Schenn - Tarasenko
Sanford - Thomas - Kyrou
Barby - Sunny -Bozak
Who do you push out of that group? I guess Sanford is the weak link, but that would be crazy for a 19 year old non-blue-chipper to prove in camp he is better than a 26 year old who has paced 40 points in a season and 30 over his whole career. Sanford gets a huge benefit of the doubt over Neighbours. Even if he does outshine Sanford, then he has to beat out Kostin gunning for that spot as well. There is absolutely no way you push anyone else to the press box in favour of a non-blue-chip kid. Maybe if Sunny is hurt, he wins out over Kostin, but that would also be tough given Kostin's momentum from the KHL last year.
First, no clue why you keep calling him non-blue chip. You're selling him way short. He was first round pick, took huge step last year, and he has apparently gotten bigger, faster, and improved his shot. Now maybe he isn't ready or isn't that good, but he is arguably top forward prospect in organization.
Second, Sunny likely won't be ready when camp breaks.
Third, Tarasenko may well be dealt by then.
Fourth, you really gonna keep Bozo or Sanford in lineup ahead of Neighbours if kid has great camp and looks to be better option?
Fifth, if he doesn't make team out of camp do you send him back to juniors and miss out on whole season? Makes more sense to keep him if close and see how he does in regular season. Can always send him down later.
I deleted your answers to my 1st 4 questions bc they were well thought out and I have nothing to add. But I want to address this bc there is factual issue. He can be sent down to juniors at any point during season. If he plays more than 9 games he burns 1st year of ELC, which some clubs actually see as positive bc he will have less of a case for big raise on 2nd contract (although admittedly no evidence we view this way).Let me flip the question. If he only makes the team because Sunqvist is hurt, do you keep him up all year knowing you can't send him back to juniors. Once he plays more than 9 games, he cannot go down to juniors or the AHL. If Sunny is hurt for 15 games, maybe you keep him up and play him in 8 of those games. But no way you burn a year on his ELC to have him up for the whole season when you only need him for 15 games and you have adaquate players for the 4th line role he'd be filling.
I don't even think you have to say "not my definition" honestly. Blue chip is an incredibly high-level for any prospect at any sport. It's the designation given to players that have proven to be the very best in their respective sport at their respective age groups. Putting Neighbours in the blue chip label puts him on the same tier as Alexis Lafreniere or the aforementioned Quinton Byfield. And honestly, doing so is more unfair to Neighbours than anyone.Because he isn't, at least not my definition. Blue chips are can't miss prospects.
Since Jake has played in 4 seasons with the Oil Kings, wouldn’t he be able to get sent down to Springfield despite being 19 still?
I thought Lou had made a mistake in the article, and then I saw he had done his 4 years.
my predictions (TIFWIW):First, no clue why you keep calling him non-blue chip. You're selling him way short. He was first round pick, took huge step last year, and he has apparently gotten bigger, faster, and improved his shot. Now maybe he isn't ready or isn't that good, but he is arguably top forward prospect in organization.
Second, Sunny likely won't be ready when camp breaks.
Third, Tarasenko may well be dealt by then.
Fourth, you really gonna keep Bozo or Sanford in lineup ahead of Neighbours if kid has great camp and looks to be better option?
Fifth, if he doesn't make team out of camp do you send him back to juniors and miss out on whole season? Makes more sense to keep him if close and see how he does in regular season. Can always send him down later.
I don’t think you can send a junior player to the AHL, even after NHL service, unless they turn 20 on or before December 31 of that season. I don’t believe CHL tenure has any bearing on that.Since Jake has played in 4 seasons with the Oil Kings, wouldn’t he be able to get sent down to Springfield despite being 19 still?
I thought Lou had made a mistake in the article, and then I saw he had done his 4 years.
I don’t think you can send a junior player to the AHL, even after NHL service, unless they turn 20 on or before December 31 of that season. I don’t believe CHL tenure has any bearing on that.
This is correct, the limit you can play in the CHL is either 4 years of major junior hockey OR being age 20 before December 31st of the year they play. However, I dont know if 11 games is considered a full year by the CHL standards, but if they do, then Neighbours is eligible to play in the AHL.I am pretty sure that Tenure does play a role and think theater 4 years is the amount of time to be able to move onto the AHL. The one question is how is last year viewed.
The real question is does that actually benefit him. Is e ready to move on. He essentially lost a year of development last season. And I am pretty sure Kostin would have be fitted from a year in Jr.
Just because a kid says hers goal is to make the team, well that should be every prospects goal. Doesn’t mean he is strong enough to handle the ware and tear of the full season in the NHL.
I am pretty sure that Tenure does play a role and think theater 4 years is the amount of time to be able to move onto the AHL. The one question is how is last year viewed.
The real question is does that actually benefit him. Is e ready to move on. He essentially lost a year of development last season. And I am pretty sure Kostin would have be fitted from a year in Jr.
Just because a kid says hers goal is to make the team, well that should be every prospects goal. Doesn’t mean he is strong enough to handle the ware and tear of the full season in the NHL.
I wasn't aware of the 4 years exception, and I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I'm still not sure Neighbours would qualify. According to this article from Frank Servalli,I believe you can play in the AHL if you have 4 seasons in the CHL (OHL/WHL/QMJHL) which Neighbours has. Though he only played 11 games in his rookie season, I think that still counts.