Post-Game Talk: #26 - 11/29/18 - 730pm :: RANGERS vs. senators

[Mandar]

anyone hear Shatt's name that period?

 

[Vinny DeAngelo]

Was Mathews’ razor injuries too

 

[Richard Banger]

They fully deserve a loss just for playing ADA at forward.

I'm with @Faceless , I'd have ****ing Staal there first.

Ada isn't at forward. Smith is.

 

[RangerLifer]

Oh, boy. The "scary good" Buffalo Sabres are back. I want to vomit.

 

[Ghost of jas]

Taylor Pyatt is retired.

Taylor Pyatt is fast. (Old HF meme.)

 

[Machinehead]

Actually, now that I think of it, I like Staal at forward.

He can't play defense at forward.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Wow Karlsson seems like a real dick.

 

[Irishguy42]

Actually, now that I think of it, I like Staal at forward.

He can't play defense at forward.

Just like the rest of them.

 

[Ghost of jas]

Actually, now that I think of it, I like Staal at forward.

He can't play defense at forward.

Or on defense.

 

[Tob]

SJS gets wrecked in this Leafs Sabres highlight reel

 

[Vinny DeAngelo]

Wow Karlsson seems like a real dick.

They literally didn’t have the cash to pay him... I’m confused

 

[will1066]

[QUOTE="Machinehead, post: 152878399, member: 115807"Ah, joined late.

They did the right thing then.

Actually, the right thing would have been calling up a forward, but whatever.[/QUOTE]

They'd rather play a defenseman at forward than having Lettieri again.

 

[effen]

Wow Karlsson seems like a real dick.

Ottawa treated him piss-poor his last year there. Good for him.

 

[Tob]

They literally didn’t have the cash to pay him... I’m confused

Also said he wouldn't answer questions about his return to OTT until game day and not after a loss during a tough season for him and the sharks. lmfao at the "the time is nighhhhh" build up.

 

[Jayan]

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

They literally didn’t have the cash to pay him... I’m confused

Huh? I was talking about the interview Pidto just showed.

 

[Rempe73]

The only time I have ever seen this ridiculous theory work is when Sergei Fedorov played defense. But he was a freak.

Lol yea. It’s just a very lazy idea to assume offensive d-men should be tried at forward, and defensive forwards should be tried at d. They’ve played one position for years. Switching rarely works. Not to mention it usually hurts the development of the player, since they have to take the extra time to learn a new position.

 

[Machinehead]

They'd rather play a defenseman at forward than having Lettieri again.

This is fair. Lettieri gives me meningitis.

 

[effen]

Also said he wouldn't answer questions about his return to OTT until game day and not after a loss during a tough season for him and the sharks. lmfao at the "the time is nighhhhh" build up.

I woulda slugged him tbh.

 

[will1066]

Ottawa treated him piss-poor his last year there. Good for him.

There was also that nutcase woman going after his wife.

 

[Glen Sathers Cigar]

Gotta admit, Smith playing LW is objectively funny.

 

[Ghost of jas]

[QUOTE="Machinehead, post: 152878399, member: 115807"Ah, joined late.

They did the right thing then.

Actually, the right thing would have been calling up a forward, but whatever.

They'd rather play a defenseman at forward than having Lettieri again.[/QUOTE]

I somewhat agree with them.

 

[egelband]

The Rangers have turned pucks over. They have had poor coverages. Chasing opposition. Odd man rushes.

They have hardly dominated.

True. They have had some bad bounces. But they’ve controlled play. Ottawa has been lucky. If things continue as they’re going I’d bank on the Rangers. And I certainly don’t think their effort has been poor. Anyhow, just my two cents.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Also said he wouldn't answer questions about his return to OTT until game day and not after a loss during a tough season for him and the sharks. lmfao at the "the time is nighhhhh" build up.

I didn't realize this. I take back my comment if this is true.

 

[Fvital92]

Actually, now that I think of it, I like Staal at forward.

He can't play defense at forward.

And he would play 6 minutes and not 20.