GDT: #26 - 11/29/13 | New York Rangers @ Boston Bruins | 1:00 PM - NBC

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I absolutely can be objective, but thats not a soft goal. Sometimes you have to give credit to the OTHER team/player. He absolutely ripped that shot.

Again, if you've never stood in front of a bomb from the point and let a shot in, you have no idea that sometimes its near impossible to react to something coming at you THAT quick.

All the armchair goalies/hockey players here will still force their uneducated opinions on the rest of us.

THE SHOT HIT HIM IN THE MOTHER****ING CHEST! :laugh:

I'm sorry, but Hank has to make that save. If people were complaining about the other goals I'd be with you 100%. Those were not soft goals and were not on Hank. They were team breakdowns.

Here, there was a turnover. Sure. But the defender in front of the net was able to clear out a path for Lundqvist to have clear sight of the shot. And he STILL missed it. Even after it hit him in the chest.

Late in a tie game, that shot has to be stopped. It's an unacceptable goal and if you had the ability to be objective you'd realize that.
 
My feelings on that goal is that it's not a soft one... but I want Henrik Lundqvist to make the save.
 
I never thought I would say this but I wish the Rangers were the Devils right now.. That team has scored 4 goals with their goalie pulled and the Rangers can't even get a shot on net with the extra attacker..
 
Sorry man, but a superstar goalie makes that stop. Lundqvist has been playing a level below this entire year so far. Late in a tie game? That shot has to be saved. Period.

I guess. Don't disagree that Hank has not had a very good year.

And some people on this board want to pay a goalie nine ****ing million dollars. Let that sink in.
Yeah, I ain't about that. I question giving him $7M.
 
Again, you side step the fact that the better team is winning and that Rask hasn't been tested, and let up two soft goals.

Don't try and pin this on Lundqvist. It comes off as completely bias. Rask let up two soft goals, and the Rangers quit playing.

You can't sit back against the Bruins with a one goal lead and expect to win. Rangers stunk big time thus far.

What does Rask or anything else have to do with whether or not Lundqvist should have made that save
 
If I had booked everything you said that actually came to fruition I might have enough to fit on a piece of paper from a fortune cookie. Don't you have a chicken to check or something?

sad-face.png
 
time to take a more serious look at talbot, give him 2 or 3 starts in a row, he deserves the chance. this is not vintage lundqvist this year for whatever reason.
 
Only these fans could blame a guy for the puck bouncing off his arm into the goal, but completely absolve a goalie of letting in a soft goal from the blue line. :laugh:

Hard shot or not, that should be a routine pad save for a butterfly goalie.

Agreed. Drop into the butterfly and you should stop that.

And Callahan should not even touch the puck on the PP unless he's going for a deflection. He kills our entry and possession.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad