Detroit Knights
Registered User
- Feb 29, 2012
- 3,638
- 2,122
If I gave the impression that I only think this is the game, then apologies, but that is just not what I meant. I am saying this is the game that pushes the needle forward on whatever his plan is. I am not saying this is the only game that matters in his decision making.He's not going to completely swing the moves he's going to make based off of 60 minutes of hockey. Come on, man. Y'all go so much more granular than any of these managers do. Yzerman knows what his plan is. You're going to convince yourself one way or another, if you're fully bought in on the prospects, you won't want him to deal anyone and will poopoo any offer. If you just want the playoffs, you'll see all of the reasonably priced guys go and say "Why no us?"
He's shown that he'll make a deal when he thinks the bargain is prosperous and he'll hold when he thinks it isn't. He didn't sell at the deadline a couple years ago because Ottawa won two in a row. He sold at that deadline because the Wings over a consistent stretch prior to that were not performing how he'd like.
This is like the people who get a stiffy about what some future prospect can be because he had a 1+1 game in the IIHF tournament.
We got manhandled the first game against cbj a week before trade deadline. second game was close and competitive but it was a novelty game, so it is what it is.
couple these games with our previous 2 or 3. Now, you are going to go compete with a top team in the conference for the better part of a decade or so. How much fight does this team actually have? He has said before that he believed we are a wild card team at the lalonde firing presser. So, whatever happens in this game, will ultimately determine what this team is in his eyes, whether that confirms his beliefs from december, or it questions it and he has to go to the drawing board. (mostly because we'll only have one more game until the deadline if it's on friday and we are playing Utah on Thursday, which does nothing in favor to my argument)
I also wouldn't want him to get rid of prospects that are a part of the future plan, but at the same time, you can't say no to a trade that has a young enough player in our window (as yzerman has said is larkin and younger) for the "possibility" that x or y prospect is going to hit.
Berggren is great, but he is not being utilized for what he should be, so use him to trade for someone that can push us over the edge into the playoffs this year. Yes, I am okay with him being in a trade for a rental to get seider, raymond, ed, aljo, and larkin playoff experience with some of the vets we already have that have that experience. Berggren just has no future on this team and that really does suck, so just move on already. Throw in veleno for fun (wanted him gone for 3 years now).
Once you taste the playoffs, you don't want to lose it and we have been ruining Larkin for a decade and while it feels like he has had the taste in his mouth this and last season, you give him and other young guys that taste, it will not go away.
I do not care whatsoever if we go to the playoffs and lose 4-0 first round. That will show the young players how much harder they need to work in order to succeed and if they aren't up for it, then why would you want to find that out later? FAFO now.