I was playing around looking at some advanced stats and happened to see this. Low Danger Goals Against:
View attachment 957604
I know PDO is out there as a measurement of "luck", but man, Chiarot and Petry being league leaders in garbage goals against seems like maybe an indicator that they maybe aren't as bad as they seem and won't be the cause of so many losses in the future
I was playing around looking at some advanced stats and happened to see this. Low Danger Goals Against:
View attachment 957604
I know PDO is out there as a measurement of "luck", but man, Chiarot and Petry being league leaders in garbage goals against seems like maybe an indicator that they maybe aren't as bad as they seem and won't be the cause of so many losses in the future
I have to say, as president of the Chiarot hater club, that these games under McLellan have been the very best games I've ever seen him play and by like 2 standard deviations. He looks so good right now (at least compared to normal).I feel like that has a lot to do with the tremendous shot disparity they were giving up as a pairing. More shots = more opportunities for garbage goals
Chiarot has been tremendous under McLellan so far
I feel like that has a lot to do with the tremendous shot disparity they were giving up as a pairing. More shots = more opportunities for garbage goals
Chiarot has been tremendous under McLellan so far
Chiarot has taken a lot of shit from his first season when his Dad was dying and he+Mo were playing thehardest minutes in the league.I would argue that part of Chiarot and the other D looking better is a result of the better puck support and zone exits. I've been saying Chiarot gets too much grief here. And a lot of the problems were from running around after getting pinned in their own end.
I'd be curious to see stats on how much the Wings have been spending in the offensive versus defensive zone since Mclellan took over.
How the hell do we have a better PP than a team that had Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Hossa, Franzen, Lidstrom, Rafalski, and Kronwall.
wait until we add asp to that unitA lot of it is chemistry, all 4 of kane, Larkin, Raymond, and debrincat have great shots and are big threats to score from their positions, they all pass the puck great. Seider is great at keeping the puck in and walking the line, and is a good passer. Legit the only thing holding them back even further is seiders mediocre Shot.
I legit think ASP and seider should both play on the PP together. Seider is good for keeping it in and holding the line and is very good at moving the puck, he could be setting ASP up from the ovechkin spot. Plus having seider getting back if there is any odd man rushes is a lot better than if it were just ASP.wait until we add asp to that unit
How the hell do we have a better PP than a team that had Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Hossa, Franzen, Lidstrom, Rafalski, and Kronwall.
yea, but who do you take off to add asp?I legit think ASP and seider should both play on the PP together. Seider is good for keeping it in and holding the line and is very good at moving the puck, he could be setting ASP up from the ovechkin spot. Plus having seider getting back if there is any odd man rushes is a lot better than if it were just ASP.
Kane...yea, but who do you take off to add asp?
are you thinking what i'm thinking? 6 man power play unit!!!
i think kane could play another year at a high levelKane...