Salary Cap: - 24-25 Salary Thread Crosbicles Volume MXVI: End of season wrap up | Page 87 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Salary Cap: 24-25 Salary Thread Crosbicles Volume MXVI: End of season wrap up

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those were 2013, 2012, and 2010 respectively. This team absolutely has not, by any metric, drafted pretty well for a decade. :laugh:
I mean even excluding that the Pens have had a grand total of three first round picks since 2015 and two of those were 21st overall selections.

I'm not sure what you expect results-wise when they never have high first round picks and rarely even have firsts at all.
 
Nah this isn't the actual issue with their drafting track record. JR just whiffed on a ton of picks and went off the board for guys he thought were good but ended up being nothing.

In JR's drafts from 2016 onwards, he drafted Gustavsson, Bjorkqvist, Hall, Lauzon, Phillips, Addison, Hallander, Poulin and Legare with their 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks. That's just bad drafting by JR, that's not drafting players to fit Sullivan's system. Bjorkqvist is really the only guy that even fits that description of that group, while Addison is the complete opposite of that.

JR's drafting was a lot more about beefing up the Penguins and adding size/physicality than it was about trying to draft PKers that fit the Penguins system.

This.

The player that Sullivan has loved most as a Penguin without an immediately obvious reason is Bryan Rust.

The only one of those picks that looks like Rust is Hallander, at a bit of a stretch.

Honestly, we'd probably be better off if Rutherford had pandered to Sullivan. (edit: (that's assuming Sullivan mainly wanted forwards like Rust and wasn't eager for Poulin et al, which might be a mistake, although if he's pounding the table for those guy he's more pro-physicality than portrayed (but maybe he is, he embraced it with the US team)))

Incidentally, it's also got to be noted that five of those guys had some major health issues that can't have helped their development at all. Probably not decisive factors on why they haven't achieved more on any of them, but luck happens and the Pens was all bad.
 
Last edited:
I mean even excluding that the Pens have had a grand total of three first round picks since 2015 and two of those were 21st overall selections.

I'm not sure what you expect results-wise when they never have high first round picks and rarely even have firsts at all.
Yeah but that just goes back to my broader point about scouting being dogshit. Pro level scouting, both from scouts as well as the GMs, has been atrocious. Paying 1st liner prices for 3rd liners became the norm for years for this team and that kinda shit results in a famine when it comes to young, effective talent coming up through your system--and that will absolutely kill your organization sooner or later.

It's fine to trade 1sts and/or prospects in a win-now environment. It's not fine when you're doing that for guys like Brassard, Zucker, Kapanen, and trading back out of the 1st round for a f***ing loser like Reaves, who's arguably been the worst forward in the league since Tanner Glass. :laugh:
 
Yeah but that just goes back to my broader point about scouting being dogshit. Pro level scouting, both from scouts as well as the GMs, has been atrocious. Paying 1st liner prices for 3rd liners became the norm for years for this team and that kinda shit results in a famine when it comes to young, effective talent coming up through your system--and that will absolutely kill your organization sooner or later.

It's fine to trade 1sts and/or prospects in a win-now environment. It's not fine when you're doing that for guys like Brassard, Zucker, Kapanen, and trading back out of the 1st round for a f***ing loser like Reaves, who's arguably been the worst forward in the league since Tanner Glass. :laugh:
Dubas has overhauled a lot of that, so I guess the upside is we probably have mostly new goobers making these choices and doing our scouting now :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Friggin Dummy
He was fine... up to this season.

Dude was like watching depression incarnate on skates this year. It's over. I don't think it could be any clearer.
I'm not sure if you love Malkin like you claim or hate him so much it blinds you, but I think there's a reason one post has numerous likes and you're has none.

He is what he is, but he's not as bad as you think either.
 
Yeah I think it was during Shero's time that it came out that Shero was in charge of the 1st rounders but every other pick was up to the scouting director and regional scouts. I know they made a big deal out of the scout that wanted to draft Guentzel back in 2013 and spent a ton of time looking at him:


This isn't like EHM or OOTP where a GM looks at the potential ratings page of all of the prospects available. A GM is taking the word of his amateur scouts with these prospects, a GM doesn't have time to scout every single prospect that they may take in a draft. If you have shitty scouts, you're going to make shitty picks.
Nah this isn't the actual issue with their drafting track record. JR just whiffed on a ton of picks and went off the board for guys he thought were good but ended up being nothing.

In JR's drafts from 2016 onwards, he drafted Gustavsson, Bjorkqvist, Hall, Lauzon, Phillips, Addison, Hallander, Poulin and Legare with their 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks. That's just bad drafting by JR, that's not drafting players to fit Sullivan's system. Bjorkqvist is really the only guy that even fits that description of that group, while Addison is the complete opposite of that.

JR's drafting was a lot more about beefing up the Penguins and adding size/physicality than it was about trying to draft PKers that fit the Penguins system.

Says JR whiffed on a ton of picks, while saying it's not the GM's fault, it's the scouts who make the picks because a GM doesn't have time to scout every pick.

So which is it, Emp? Is it JR's fault or not? :sarcasm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons
The thing is, we didn't even try to get out of bad contracts. I'm not going to give us a pass for signing bad contracts and then not trying to get out of them. :laugh: Like we didn't have to sign Letang to an absolute boat anchor contract, but we did. We didn't have to hold on to every mediocre signing, but we did.

Luck helps, but also having the wherewithal to take advantage of those lucky breaks is a skill that our front office has lacked for several different administrations.
There's a huge difference between putting your aging Stars on LTIR and trying to strong-arm them into waiving their NMCs.
 
He was fine... up to this season.

Dude was like watching depression incarnate on skates this year. It's over. I don't think it could be any clearer.
Still feel like Malkin could squeeze out 50+ points next year, with improved wingers. He got 50 in 68 games this year.
Bunting was particularly awful at 5v5, and wasn't helping him. He also spent a lot of time with Beauvillier and Glass, who were 1.32 and 1.17 5v5 P/P60, respectively. Woeful numbers which you'd expect on your 4th line.
Letang's offense took a big hit. Even less help there.

Koivunen and McGroarty will be up full time, I'd imagine. That's a lot of positive energy for him.
Tomasino and Geno have some chemistry as well.
If Heinen is staying, he can produce well at even-strength, like he always has here. He can fill an L2 wing role for a while.

There's the coaching bump factor to consider. Some draft capital may get used to bring young talent.
It's also Malkin's last year, in all likelihood. He may be more motivated to end it on a better note. He's a pretty emotional, prideful guy.

I've learned not to give up on players in their late 30's prematurely. It's becoming more and more common in sports that they surprise people.
Malkin may yet play up to his cap hit, if he can stay healthy.
 
This is a bit off topic but Tiffels had a very good game against the US boys. Overall he had a super strong season and outstanding playoffs.

Again, I wonder why they don't give players like that a chance and let the Harkins of the world play instead.
 
Still feel like Malkin could squeeze out 50+ points next year, with improved wingers. He got 50 in 68 games this year.
Bunting was particularly awful at 5v5, and wasn't helping him. He also spent a lot of time with Beauvillier and Glass, who were 1.32 and 1.17 5v5 P/P60, respectively. Woeful numbers which you'd expect on your 4th line.
Letang's offense took a big hit. Even less help there.

Koivunen and McGroarty will be up full time, I'd imagine. That's a lot of positive energy for him.
Tomasino and Geno have some chemistry as well.
If Heinen is staying, he can produce well at even-strength, like he always has here. He can fill an L2 wing role for a while.

There's the coaching bump factor to consider. Some draft capital may get used to bring young talent.
It's also Malkin's last year, in all likelihood. He may be more motivated to end it on a better note. He's a pretty emotional, prideful guy.

I've learned not to give up on players in their late 30's prematurely. It's becoming more and more common in sports that they surprise people.
Malkin may yet play up to his cap hit, if he can stay healthy.
Barring a trade for the top 6, I think we'll see Geno with McGroarty and Rust to start the season.

Koivunen - Crosby - Rakell
McGroarty - Malkin - Rust
Hallander - Novak - Tomassino
 
  • Like
Reactions: Empoleon8771
Barring a trade for the top 6, I think we'll see Geno with McGroarty and Rust to start the season.

Koivunen - Crosby - Rakell
McGroarty - Malkin - Rust
Hallander - Novak - Tomassino
Yeah, there'll be a hard emphasis on playing youth. That's one of the conditions with this hire. He needs to be on the same page as Dubas with development.
So you think they're trading Heinen, or just using him on L4?
 
Yeah, there'll be a hard emphasis on playing youth. That's one of the conditions with this hire. He needs to be on the same page as Dubas with development.
So you think they're trading Heinen, or just using him on L4?
I think you try to trade him. Ideally Acciari and Hayes as well, but I don't see a trade for either until the trade deadline.

Personally I would go with a fourth line of Lizotte, Dewar, Poulin or Ponomarev.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AuroraBorealis
Then I think Hayes, Heinen as well as Acciari can be traded.
I would use one on Karlsson at 50%, personally. Acciari's not worth a slot imo. You can bury 1.2M of his 2M in the minors.
Even retaining on Ned would make more sense. Murashov is close, Larsson played super well and I'm sure Blommer will be better next year. Need to clear the logjam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sideline
Tbh I don't see much of a need to do anything with the forward group, and I think Dubas basically said he viewed it as the same. I'm pretty fine going into next year with:

McGroarty-Crosby-Rakell
Koivunen-Malkin-Rust
Hallander-Novak-Tomasino
Dewar-Lizotte-Acciari
Ponomarev-Heinen

I think you need to move Hayes, but I figure you can flip him for like a 5th pretty easily with the cap jumping a bunch. Beyond that, I'm pretty good not doing anything with the forward group and would only target high upside players to add (like Rossi or Howard). Start with that and sell off the depth veterans like Lizotte, Acciari and Heinen at the deadline next year for likely a couple of 3rd-5th round picks.

They need massive work on defense, though. I'd like for them to try to enter next year with a defense like:

Hague-Letang
Byram-XXXXX
Graves-Timmins
Shea

I'd be targeting Hague as a "flip later" guy after playing in a top-4 role for a year or two. I think you can get him now for a 2nd, keep him for a year or two and then flip him for 2 2nds or a 1st at the deadline as a rental. Byram would be a long-term addition and whoever you'd get in the Karlsson trade would fill in that 2nd pair RD spot.
 
I would use one on Karlsson at 50%, personally. Acciari's not worth a slot imo. You can bury 1.2M of his 2M in the minors.
Even retaining on Ned would make more sense. Murashov is close, Larsson played super well and I'm sure Blommer will be better next year. Need to clear the logjam.
Fair point. Didn’t have have Karlsson on my radar. But I also don’t think Dubas wants to retain 50% on Karlsson for that long and I also think you should give Karlsson a shot under a new coach. His value is pretty much on an all time low right now.
 
Fair point. Didn’t have have Karlsson on my radar. But I also don’t think Dubas wants to retain 50% on Karlsson for that long and I also think you should give Karlsson a shot under a new coach. His value is pretty much on an all time low right now.
I don't think he will retain that much either. That's just what I would do, when we have no chance at winning rounds anytime soon and need the high draft picks.
But Dubas is sorta fed up with him based on the presser, and he might be gone before next summer.
I don't think he'd be that hard to trade, if they retain enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosAgent
He was fine... up to this season.

Dude was like watching depression incarnate on skates this year. It's over. I don't think it could be any clearer.
Reports of Malkin's demise have been greatly exaggerated. The fact that he managed 50 in 68 with that supporting cast and a lot of 2nd unit PP time is borderline heroic. How amped would you be to play with a rotating combo of Bunting, Beauvillier, and Glass every night?

The additions of a new coach, Novak/McG/Koivunen, and hopefully a useful top 6 wing on a short term deal should help matters.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad