Toggle sidebar

Salary Cap: '24-'25 Salary Thread: Crosbicles Volume MMXXV - Poolman and Poolparty?!?

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
BobCole said:
Are you trying to tell me if you had $5M today and were owed $20M more, you would say, "no thanks?" If so, that puts you in exceedingly, exceedingly, exceedingly, rare company. All for fear of "turning into a malformed creature" if you had more money?

Like, I totally understand the sentiment of, "you have a billion dollars, why do you need more?" At that point, it is literally not making a difference, unless you are a malformed creature, like you say. But the reason I outlined those #s was to demonstrate that Tristan Jarry's qualify of life (and that of his family) will be MEANINGFULLY different by collecting the rest of the money that is owed to him. Do you understand that?
Click to expand...
I’m simply stating that the metrics important to me wouldn’t dictate making more money than I need.

I’m not telling anyone else how to live their lives. I completely understand the difference especially when agent fees, and taxes are factored in. I have an MBA in Finance.

I see that the world is a rock, and we’re monkeys fighting for hierarchy on it. I choose to not participate as much as possible.
 
eXile3 said:
I’m simply stating that the metrics important to me wouldn’t dictate making more money than I need.

I’m not telling anyone else how to live their lives. I completely understand the difference especially when agent fees, and taxes are factored in. I have an MBA in Finance.

I see that the world is a rock, and we’re monkeys fighting for hierarchy on it. I choose to not participate as much as possible.
Click to expand...
There are so many contradictions in this post alone, let alone in combination with what you've said previously. I won't even bother to address it all, I'll just leave it at this: you spent almost a decade in academia studying finance of all topics. You have unarguably "participated in the fight on the hierarchy" quite a bit more than "as a little as possible," and you certainly are interested in earning more money than merely what you "need."
 
Empoleon8771 said:
Why would that be a horrible trade?

Byram is a 23 year old #3D that likely would only be available due to being redundant in Buffalo.
Click to expand...

Have no interest in spending what could potentially be a 2026 unprotected 1st on a player we'd be paying like 6-7 mil to who is a few hits away from not having a career.

Also, don't you love these Jfresh cards?

1738696234145.png
 
DesertPenguin said:
Sad to see Petts and DOC go but I think it necessary. Here on out I'd like to see as many pending UFAs as possible traded, and the kids up. Beauvillier, Gryzelcyk, Glass, Puljujarvi, Nieto all traded or waived. Run like this down the stretch.

Rakell Crosby Rust
Bunting Malkin Tomasino
Heinen Ponomarev Koivunen
Hayes Lizzote Acciari

That forward group is one Mitch Marner ( I can dream right?) away from looking good.

POJ Karlsson
Pickering Letang
Graves Desharneis

POJ is a stopgap for a legit top pair LD, but the rest could be OK next year. I think we're gonna have cap to go do those things too.
Click to expand...
1738696667480.png


20M in cap space to go sign a stud RW and LD seems dooable. I'd throw 14M at Marner or Rantanen. 8+ at Boeser or Ehlers. LD UFAs are slim pickings. Gavrikov, Chychrun or Lindgren maybe.
 
Last edited:
Randy Butternubs said:
Would love Hague.

I don't know much about Novak but pulling off another trade with Nashville would be hilarious.
Click to expand...

Novak rocks. Would be a killer add for us and we could probably get him back on the level he was previously and return a pick with him.

Obviously that's the intention with all the additions. Ehlers, Novak, and Hague are the type of players you leverage into picks.
 
Empoleon8771 said:
Why would that be a horrible trade?

Byram is a 23 year old #3D that likely would only be available due to being redundant in Buffalo.



I can't imagine Clarke is available though. Byram could be due to Buffalo having Dahlin and Powers on LD.
Click to expand...
I loved the way he played in 2022 but since then he’s tried to become an OFD like he was in junior and I think he kinda sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Empoleon8771
Empoleon8771 said:
I forgot that this place does not allow literally any nuance in a discussion about Sullivan, so I'm going to tap out and not waste my time in this debate.
Click to expand...
I agree nuance isn’t always received well here, and I understand your point about Sully not having a great roster to work with, other warts notwithstanding.

That said, last year especially, there were times when this team, not just 1 or 2 players, looked like a top-10 team in the league. Every team will have inconsistency throughout the season, but I wonder how much better they could have been (again, especially last year) with a different coach.

Maybe Sullivan maxed them out. We’ll never know, and I wish we would have at least tried
 
  • Like
Reactions: Empoleon8771, HandshakeLine and Malkinstheman
IcedCapp said:
I agree nuance isn’t always received well here, and I understand your point about Sully not having a great roster to work with, other warts notwithstanding.

That said, last year especially, there were times when this team, not just 1 or 2 players, looked like a top-10 team in the league. Every team will have inconsistency throughout the season, but I wonder how much better they could have been (again, especially last year) with a different coach.

Maybe Sullivan maxed them out. We’ll never know, and I wish we would have at least tried
Click to expand...

Yeah my point regarding Sullivan was just specifically about this year and this roster. He has hurt the roster for years and the roster today is still underperforming where it should be. That said, the roster today is absolute crap and I don't have any expectations that a coach should be getting this team anywhere even close to making the playoffs. They just don't have the talent to do it anymore.

There are a myriad of reasons to fire Sullivan at this point, I just thought that specific one of "the team isn't close to a playoff spot" wasn't valid. I attribute that to the roster more than Sullivan this year, because the roster is just comically bad. Anything before this year? 100% on Sullivan.
 
Also in terms of the 2025 draft, apparently Bobby Mac is saying that there's a sharp decline in talent beyond pick 20 and guys in the 2nd round this year are more normally 3rd round caliber. That makes me really conflicted on whether I want the Rangers pick this year or next year, pick #25 next year may yield a better prospect than pick #16 this year.

I think the Rangers are a pretty safe bet to bounce back and be better next year than this year, but the apparent difference in draft strengths for this year versus next year do make me wonder about the pick. If that pick falls in the 2025 draft, I may be tempted to try to move up to draft either Misa or Hagens using that pick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom