Salary Cap: '24-'25 Salary Thread: Crosbicles Volume MMXXV - Poolman and Poolparty?!?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Meanwhile Petts and O'Connor returned what could be a much better 1st.

I expect a 1st, player for cap reasons and a 2nd, or similar value prospect.

Trading Rakell for simply a very very late 1st and Moore is terrible.

Why is the Kings 1st very very late? They haven’t exited the 1st round in 5+ years and are currently 12th in the league.
 
Why is the Kings 1st very very late? They haven’t exited the 1st round in 5+ years and are currently 12th in the league.
Because Rakell could spark the Kings, and they are 3rd in the Pacific division and placing there or 2nd (possible) they avoid the Oilers in the 1st round.

That puts them at a possible 24 finish or later. Upsets.
 
People need to stop viewing Rakell as some super valuable piece. :laugh:

If someone offers a 1st you take it. Era's over. Load up and hope you find some gems with extra draft capital over the next handful of years and maybe you'll have a shot at making the post-Sid mire only last a few years as opposed to like a decade.

Rickard Rakell doesn't f***ing matter, man. :laugh: Nobody on this roster does except Sid, Geno. and maybe Pickering and Blomqvist, though Murashov and Larsson both look impressive too on the goalie prospect front.

Everyone should be for sale. The team's gotta stop this half-assed bullshit that's got people like "Hmmm, not an obscene fleecing for a super important middle 6 guy like Rakell. Pass." :laugh:
 
Because Rakell could spark the Kings, and they are 3rd in the Pacific division and placing there or 2nd (possible) they avoid the Oilers in the 1st round.

That puts them at a possible 24 finish or later. Upsets.

And the Rangers could easily make the playoffs and go the conference finals like they have multiple times in recent years.

Getting a 1st and out of a 32 year old with 3 more years’ contract gives us cap flexibility. Acquiring Moore gives us another asset we can flip.

Would be a great move.
 
Because Rakell could spark the Kings, and they are 3rd in the Pacific division and placing there or 2nd (possible) they avoid the Oilers in the 1st round.

That puts them at a possible 24 finish or later. Upsets.
I actually think the Kings are going to make a big splash at the TDL and load up. They'll be battling Vegas and then likely Edmonton in the first through round. Then probably a team like Winnipeg or Colorado or Dallas in the WCF. West will be a bloodbath. You're either in or out and with their current roster, I'm not sure how many opportunities you pass up on.
 
If you manage to snag 1st rounders for any of EK, Rust, Rakell or Bunting, you've really done well imo. EK's a purely one dimensional blueliner who has been a shell of his Norris caliber play since arriving (though I put that on the coach/system mostly). Rust is gonna be 33 in a couple months and has struggled with injuries for most of his entire career. Rakell's a whatever middle-6 guy who doesn't really hurt you on the ice and coaches love that. Bunting's a whatever middle-6 guy that teams may want because his style of play usually does well in a playoff atmosphere.

I'm really pushing for a 1st rounder to start with when it comes to any of those guys, and if that's a no go, I'm looking for good prospects or young guys who can/will be around for the post-Sid chapter. Might be able to get something like that from a team that's been bad lately but is looking to take the next step toward competing. Teams like Detroit and Ottawa fit the bill there imo.

Letang's a wild card. He has a name and resume everyone recognizes but his play's dropped off a f***ing cliff the past couple of years, hot streaks aside, and I'm sure this team hesitates to trade the guy because of the potential to really piss Sid and/or Geno off. Not that I personally give a shit, but the team will, for sure. But Letang's cooked, couldn't care less if he retires a Penguin tbh. And who knows? Maybe he rebounds a bit in a better system and on a team where he's not playing 25 minutes a night.
 
If you manage to snag 1st rounders for any of EK, Rust, Rakell or Bunting, you've really done well imo.
I'd be disappointed if we didn't get a first or equivalent asset for EK, Rust, or Rakell.

If you asked me last off season that probably wouldn't have been the case but with the cap rising and with the Pens being able to use their retention slots there's very little excuse not to get high quality assets back for EK, Rust, or Rakell.

Bunting I'm less sold on them getting a good return for just because I don't think he's as highly regarded around the league as those three.

But like Rust and Rakell are on very reasonable contracts and are still highly productive players. EK has his warts but if you retain enough on that contract I think someone would flip a first for him. He can still do a lot to help a team and he's had some really good playoff runs.

If I'm someone like Carolina who always seems to struggle to score in the playoffs I'd strongly consider adding a retained EK to boost me over the top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Friggin Dummy
I'd be disappointed if we didn't get a first or equivalent asset for EK, Rust, or Rakell.

If you asked me last off season that probably wouldn't have been the case but with the cap rising and with the Pens being able to use their retention slots there's very little excuse not to get high quality assets back for EK, Rust, or Rakell.

Bunting I'm less sold on them getting a good return for just because I don't think he's as highly regarded around the league as those three.

But like Rust and Rakell are on very reasonable contracts and are still highly productive players. EK has his warts but if you retain enough on that contract I think someone would flip a first for him. He can still do a lot to help a team and he's had some really good playoff runs.

If I'm someone like Carolina who always seems to struggle to score in the playoffs I'd strongly consider adding a retained EK to boost me over the top.
Yeah, I just don't think teams are as willing to throw around 1st rounders as they used to a few years ago.

I'm definitely hoping those guys bring back high value assets, but we'll see. Rakell and Bunting are guys you probably try to move at the TDL to playoff teams looking for depth, that's likely where they're most valuable. Rust is a guy you have to wait until his NTC drops and ideally, you can get some team to bite after they've lost out on the first frenzy of FA. EK's gonna need 50% retention and an off season setting so teams can sort their cap structure out imo.

But yeah, I dunno. I'm hoping they can all bring back strong returns but we'll see. Just because they're significant players for this team doesn't mean they're really worth a bunch elsewhere. This team's depth is abysmal, and Rust, Rakell and Bunting are all middle-6 guys on legit teams imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pancakes
Even if you want to argue only getting a 1st for Rakell is light, consider this: they got him for effectively Clang and a 2nd and got 3 good years out of him overall (2 great, 1 bad). Converting Clang and a 2nd to 3 years of Rakell and a 1st is just good asset management.
 
Show me which legit team has a guy pacing for 35 goals in "the middle 6".

Rakell 24G,22A, 54 games
Guentzel 26, 25, 51 games
Kempe 24, 20, 51 games
Hischier 24, 19, 51 games
Caulfield 26, 23, 54 games
Larkin 23, 27, 54 games

Most of his points are even strength and he's the most physical of the lot of them. Top 15 in goals, top 30 goals/game. Objective first line goal scorer on a friendly contract. Yah real throwaway guy, get whatever you can for him.
 
I wonder what the Pettersson deal would have been without DOC and I wonder what the offers from Edmonton and VGK were?

I think Dubas wanted that 1st and adding DOC was the cherry topper needed to get it.

I would have been underwhelmed if it was something like: DH, VD, Fernstrom, and 2nd and then a 3rd from Edmonton for DOC.
at least he had offers and made what he thought was the best deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SEALBound
Rakell 24G,22A, 54 games
Guentzel 26, 25, 51 games
Kempe 24, 20, 51 games
Hischier 24, 19, 51 games
Caulfield 26, 23, 54 games
Larkin 23, 27, 54 games

Most of his points are even strength and he's the most physical of the lot of them. Top 15 in goals, top 30 goals/game. Objective first line goal scorer on a friendly contract. Yah real throwaway guy, get whatever you can for him.

I mean, which is more likely: Rakell is benefitting greatly from playing 19 minutes a night with Crosby, or Rakell suddenly exploded into a 35 goal, 70 point 1st liner at age 31 when he's been mostly a ~50 point 2nd liner his entire career?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad