I think the Bruins play it safe next season and have Mittelstadt be the #2C, Poitras at #3C, and Minten at #4C. If Poitras and Minten progress, that would let them potentially move Mittelstadt at the trade deadline or next offseason, and those two move up the lineup. It gives Farinacci more ice time in the AHL before he potentially makes the leap. With a weak free agency for centers, Zacha may be in demand this offseason, so if the Bruins can upgrade on wing with him in a package, I think the Bruins should entertain a deal. Bruins could also use a few more veteran voices in the room.Doing the exercise of "who is penciled in" next year and woof is this roster wide open:
Geekie - Lindholm - Pasta
Xxxx - xxxx - xxxxx
xxxx - Minten - xxxx
xxxx - Kastellic - xxxx
Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - xxxx
Lohrei - Peeke
Swayman
Korpisalo
The only one I'm going out on a limb for is Minten because I think he's passed the eye test of being a NHLer and I like his size. I want to see a full season of him at 3C and see what that looks like. I hope Khusnutdinov and Lysell could capture 3rd line roles as well, but they haven't done enough to be given a spot next year. Lindholm is just locked into that line because of his contract for better or for worse.
Everything else I'm open too any guy capturing a spot on this roster in camp. Get the highest pick you can and only target impact guys in free agency (IE Marner or Ehlers). Don't care about anyone else in Free Agency really.. If Hall or Marchand want to come back for the right price.. Sure I guess. This roster needs to find younger, impact players and move forward though.
Yeah, the more I went through the exercise and looked at what's available on the free agent market, I think they take your approach next season. Unless they go on a mad spending spree which I would highly advise against them to do.I think the Bruins play it safe next season and have Mittelstadt be the #2C, Poitras at #3C, and Minten at #4C. If Poitras and Minten progress, that would let them potentially move Mittelstadt at the trade deadline or next offseason, and those two move up the lineup. It gives Farinacci more ice time in the AHL before he potentially makes the leap. With a weak free agency for centers, Zacha may be in demand this offseason, so if the Bruins can upgrade on wing with him in a package, I think the Bruins should entertain a deal. Bruins could also use a few more veteran voices in the room.
Too low?Why on earth would you think Lohrei would get $3 mil?
Lauko, Beecher, Khusnutdinov and Merkulov should take whatever they are offered.
I am still on the fence with Mittlelstadt, to be honest, Zacha I would keep over him, although you are right Zacha might draw more interest. My money is on Minten for third line. You might have something in getting some vets in the room, but I do not want to get locked in with a bad contract, especially a long term deal. A player that might interest me because he only has one year left on his contract, Anders Lee, the money might be a little high, but you need to see where you are with the roster.I think the Bruins play it safe next season and have Mittelstadt be the #2C, Poitras at #3C, and Minten at #4C. If Poitras and Minten progress, that would let them potentially move Mittelstadt at the trade deadline or next offseason, and those two move up the lineup. It gives Farinacci more ice time in the AHL before he potentially makes the leap. With a weak free agency for centers, Zacha may be in demand this offseason, so if the Bruins can upgrade on wing with him in a package, I think the Bruins should entertain a deal. Bruins could also use a few more veteran voices in the room.
I personally would prefer the Bruins rip the band-aid a bit more and have Poitras and Minten as their middle 6. It also depends who they draft too.I am still on the fence with Mittlelstadt, to be honest, Zacha I would keep over him, although you are right Zacha might draw more interest. My money is on Minten for third line. You might have something in getting some vets in the room, but I do not want to get locked in with a bad contract, especially a long term deal. A player that might interest me because he only has one year left on his contract, Anders Lee, the money might be a little high, but you need to see where you are with the roster.
I personally would prefer the Bruins rip the band-aid a bit more and have Poitras and Minten as their middle 6. It also depends who they draft too.
it is a concernSeriously, Lohrei was on a whole different level of awful this season.
Why are you splitting up Pasta and Geekie, they are the two with chemistry, Lindholm is a long for the ride. I could live with the 4th line there would be a lot of energy. Not sure with everything else, who is you FA signing.Poitras ascending to the 2nd line center spot next year would help fix a lot... we just don't know if he's there yet. There's a lot of unknown variables with this team heading into next season, the biggest one being " are the kids ready to be full time pros" ? I'm hoping that with a good offseason and surrounded by the right players, Poitras shows that he's here to stay.
UFA Signing -- Lindholm -- Pasta
Zacha -- Poitras -- Geekie
Mittlestadt -- Minten -- Lysell
Khusy -- Kastelic -- Lauko
Lindholm -- McAvoy
Zadorov - UFA Signing
Lohrei -- Joker
It is a concern, but the kids offensive talent is off the charts and the Bruins have so many greater concerns than Mason Lohrei play.it is a concern
This is why you are one of the best posters hereAfter Marner he is the first UFA I would want Boston to sign. David Backes was poorly handled by Cassidy here and if he played in game 7 of the 19 finals I think the Bruins win.
Bennett's contract will age badly if it is a seven year deal, which I would expect. He will be 35 when it is done and he plays very physical but for the first 4 years you have a second line center/left wing who will score 50/55 points and drag this team into the fight, something they desperately needed at points this season.
Why are you splitting up Pasta and Geekie, they are the two with chemistry, Lindholm is a long for the ride. I could live with the 4th line there would be a lot of energy. Not sure with everything else, who is you FA signing.
I wouldn't say it's off the charts at all, honestly. It's decent, but off the charts I'm thinking Lane Hutson.It is a concern, but the kids offensive talent is off the charts and the Bruins have so many greater concerns than Mason Lohrei play.
Agree on Poitras rising, that would be terrific for us, and some summer bulk could help that happen. Don’t agree with Geekie move though…what if you go:Poitras ascending to the 2nd line center spot next year would help fix a lot... we just don't know if he's there yet. There's a lot of unknown variables with this team heading into next season, the biggest one being " are the kids ready to be full time pros" ? I'm hoping that with a good offseason and surrounded by the right players, Poitras shows that he's here to stay.
UFA Signing -- Lindholm -- Pasta
Zacha -- Poitras -- Geekie
Mittlestadt -- Minten -- Lysell
Khusy -- Kastelic -- Lauko
Lindholm -- McAvoy
Zadorov - UFA Signing
Lohrei -- Joker
I watched the last devils game and the worst defenseman on the ice was Luke Hughes, he was absolutely atrocious and so were the Devils in that game. I just can't get on a young defenseman who's playing for this version of the 2025 Boston Bruins. you switch Hughes and Lohrei around and you'd have similar results imo.I wouldn't say it's off the charts at all, honestly. It's decent, but off the charts I'm thinking Lane Hutson.
If McAvoy and Lindholm have health problems next year it is a concernIt is a concern, but the kids offensive talent is off the charts and the Bruins have so many greater concerns than Mason Lohrei play.
Big order to start counting him in as your second line center.Poitras has to show me something I haven't seen if he's our second line C next year.
Draft Schaefer and move Lohrei to 2nd line LWIf McAvoy and Lindholm have health problems next year it is a concern
Oh stop that crap.Draft Schaefer and move Lohrei to 2nd line LW
It probably wll age badly, but then again, Marchand was able to sustain it through age 35 and I don't think he plays any softer a style than Bennett. Yeah, Brad is probably a big outlier, but Bennett may end up doing well for most, if not all, of a seven year deal. It is worth looking at for sure even just for four years of strong play, but I would not count him out for more than that.Bennett's contract will age badly if it is a seven year deal, which I would expect. He will be 35 when it is done and he plays very physical but for the first 4 years you have a second line center/left wing who will score 50/55 points and drag this team into the fight, something they desperately needed at points this season.
I watched the last devils game and the worst defenseman on the ice was Luke Hughes, he was absolutely atrocious and so were the Devils in that game. I just can't get on a young defenseman who's playing for this version of the 2025 Boston Bruins. you switch Hughes and Lohrei around and you'd have similar results imo.
Hutson is great offensively, but his hockey IQ defensively needs work as well, last night he was terrible on the hawks last goal, chasing down the player, while leaving all kinds of open ice and the eventual goal scorer wide open.
i guess im just willing to be patient with lohrei, as I see a kid who can be a 50-60 point defenseman. Right now I feel his confidence is shot, and that says a lot, because I think he has tons of it. Bruins did a terrible job of protecting him, but with all the injuries and lack of depth on the backend they had very little choice but to throw him to the wolves. I'm expecting a near plus player or better next year if the Bruins d-crops are healthy.
Poitras has to show me something I haven't seen if he's our second line C next year.
I watched the last devils game and the worst defenseman on the ice was Luke Hughes, he was absolutely atrocious and so were the Devils in that game. I just can't get on a young defenseman who's playing for this version of the 2025 Boston Bruins. you switch Hughes and Lohrei around and you'd have similar results imo.
Hutson is great offensively, but his hockey IQ defensively needs work as well, last night he was terrible on the hawks last goal, chasing down the player, while leaving all kinds of open ice and the eventual goal scorer wide open.
i guess im just willing to be patient with lohrei, as I see a kid who can be a 50-60 point defenseman. Right now I feel his confidence is shot, and that says a lot, because I think he has tons of it. Bruins did a terrible job of protecting him, but with all the injuries and lack of depth on the backend they had very little choice but to throw him to the wolves. I'm expecting a near plus player or better next year if the Bruins d-crops are healthy.