Doesn't mean they cannot use him as a tool.
I just took a deep dive over last 2-3 days on the Bruins situation as relates to roster, cap, prospects etc
I look at this as bottom forward lines (6-8 players) and defense (2-4 players) the way my mother would outfitting our house - which was fantastic.
It’s just good eye for sales, creativity, and style / how you want to build it
The 2011 Bruins bottom 8 (6F & 2D) were all relatively cheap adds who could spruce up a team the way you want
Where me and you veer off is Lindholm. He’s probably going to get 45 points but I see him long term jumping up into 60 area ~ i know he’s been playing injured for 2-3 months
It comes down to really 9 spots
You want 5 really good F and 3 really good D ~ and a top goalie
Tampa has crushed my formula
The Bruins do have 3/4 of a foundation and they are locked up and there contracts are going to age very very well
They have 25 M in money and all their big guys signed
Excuse me for laughing when I read McAvoy, Pastrnak, Swayman and even Hampus Lindholm are overpaid ~ just wait till 27 and check back
Bruins have money and as the Athletic said they are a destination
The retool will be quick ~ they should be in the playoffs next season
I’m messing with people here but in reality the foundation is solid
As for prospects they could be better but they are adding Lohrei & Poitras
Geekie & Zacha, Sweeney stole or is it stollen
Im very optimistic ~ I’m cool, cool, cool with a top 10 pick this summer but I expect them at 100 points next season