TCB
Registered User
Bruins Network, lays it out. Couldn't agree more here.
Different scenarios though. Stamkos wanted to get paid first and play for Tampa second. He was going to get his money. Period.
Marchand is (presumably) willing to play here for a discount. In addition to everything he's done for this team, he could be really valuable as a leader/mentor and most importantly, 25 goal scorer playing for a fraction of what he's worth.
I have had enough of him and his failure to get a top line centre here as he spends all his cap and then trading picks to take those bad contracts he signs.This team he built is Latvia, Norway level bad...I do not disagree, but I also don't think he will be going anywhere just yet, so I left him off.
If Tampa can move on from Stamkos because it's in the best interest of the team then we can move on from Marchand. It's time for this front office to put on it's big boy pants and be a little ruthless, stop catering to the players' every whim.
FWIW...
EXACTLYGet rid of Sweeney now before he spends all that extra cap space on bottom 6 grinders and 7th defensemen.
FWIW...
If a GM is worried about what so and so might think if I trade Marchand, who's on the decline and on an expiring contract, in a year where your more than likely not making the playoffs. Point blank, thats the wrong guy Managing your team.
Obviously it all depends on the return if you move him. Id want a near NHL ready prospects. looking at Carolina, Colorado and Dallas as possible destinations, as they have some pretty nice prospects, package a Carlo or Frederic with him, and whats stopping Marchand from coming back in the off season, you always keep that door open.
Better yet, only means the return would be greater, if you can find a GM who feels the same or Sweeney can use that argument. On top of that undeniably Marchy will be playing with a lot better supporting cast.On the decline? He's on pace for 61pts after having little training in the off-season because he was recovering from 3 surgeries. He had 67pts in the two previous seasons, so all things considered, I have a hard time calling it a decline.
He can still shoot it for sure and really good in O zone when they have the puck.The other areas of his game though you can see age and or injury combined slowing him down.One of my fav all time players as a Bruin and if he stays I am OK with that.If he wants to try to win one last time that is fine too.On the decline? He's on pace for 61pts after having little training in the off-season because he was recovering from 3 surgeries. He had 67pts in the two previous seasons, so all things considered, I have a hard time calling it a decline.
Why? What's bad about that approach? If you know Marchand is committed to signing here and will take 'whatever is left over' why force the issue now?Then offer him that discounted contract before the deadline and have Marchand sign it. No more of this bullshit where they'll take care of all other business first and then see where they can fit him in sometime in August.
This is an A or B scenario that needs to be resolved before 3 PM Eastern on trade deadline day.
Common sense. The media. History.What makes you think that?
And now those players have moved on and are in a playoff spot, and the guy they replaced Stamkos with is a PPG.Stamkos was a UFA who they decided not to bring back. And not for nothing but the players were pissed
Wow, two $10m jumps in the next 3 years.New caps just released…
2025-26: $95.5M
2026-27: $104M
2027-28: $113.5M
Going to be quite a few more players than usual opting to hit free agency over signing with current teams in the next couple of years I’d imagine
Jeremy Swyamans agent is PISSEDWow, two $10m jumps in the next 3 years.
Folks need to stop saying things like X is overpaid. There isn't a player on this roster who won't look like a steal 18 months from now.
Elias Lindholm is overpaid.Wow, two $10m jumps in the next 3 years.
Folks need to stop saying things like X is overpaid. There isn't a player on this roster who won't look like a steal 18 months from now.
Even Lindholm. In 2 years there are going to be 3rd liners who are paid $8m.Elias Lindholm is overpaid.
Why? What's bad about that approach? If you know Marchand is committed to signing here and will take 'whatever is left over' why force the issue now?