Hookslide
Registered User
- Nov 19, 2018
- 6,044
- 5,548
At 50% that would be trueCorrect. Asking them to retain 50% of Miller costs you a 1st and more.
At 50% that would be trueCorrect. Asking them to retain 50% of Miller costs you a 1st and more.
I can't agree after watching the 'youth movement' in Vancouver. It lasted almost a decade Absurd, a decade. And they at least had Pettersson and Hughes for the last 5.
Boston has a BARE empty cupboard. Your suggesting also requires the trading for McAvoy, Swayman and Pastrnak because by the time the players are ready, those guys are well into their 30's.
Teams don't get out of that youth movement easily (Ottawa, Anaheim, Vancouver, Calgary, San Jose, Chicago, Buffalo, Detroit) and you have to be fully ready for a half-decade of playoff DNQ.
Icing on the cake for that move, the Bruins don't appear to have one single top six prospect or top four D in the system at all. None invited to the WJC's as the only NHL team with no prospects attending.
In my opinion, the Bruins have to retool. This team isn't a JT Miller away from competing if they can't consistently defend, break the puck out of their own zone, or make a pass. I'm sure Miller would be happy about that . Apart from the three players you mentioned, a lot of this roster is replaceable. It's doubtful E. Lindholm, Zadorov, and Kastelic are moved since they just signed/re-signed. Marchand is probably a lifer, but he can decide if he wants to get moved at the deadline or not.What youth movement? They have core guys in their prime now. How much would you bet one of the kids becomes a core guy?
UGGH, .......I also hit the like button, by mistake.In my opinion, the Bruins have to retool. This team isn't a JT Miller away from competing if they can't consistently defend, break the puck out of their own zone, or make a pass. I'm sure Miller would be happy about that . Apart from the three players you mentioned, a lot of this roster is replaceable. It's doubtful E. Lindholm, Zadorov, and Kastelic are moved since they just signed/re-signed. Marchand is probably a lifer, but he can decide if he wants to get moved at the deadline or not.
1. Retool by trading away players that won't have a future on this team to restock the cupboard and gain cap space.
2. Call up Merkulov and Lysell to play out the rest of the season and get them NHL experience. Let them prove that they can be mainstays on this roster moving forward. If they aren't, maybe they show everyone enough that they can be included in a deal to add to this roster in the offseason ala Spooner.
3. With the extra cap space, aim for a big ticket FA forward, and/or try to make a deal prior to the draft with the assets acquired to add another piece to the roster.
Zacha - On pace for 42pts, is tight with Pastrnak, but if a team gives the Bruins an offer they can't refuse, they should think about it.
Geekie - Was a 4th liner that became a top 9 player last season, and is now on the 1st line. He's on pace for similar numbers he had last season. Would be a great add for a playoff team.
Frederic - It sounds like Sweeney is doing his best to re-sign him so the Bruins identified him as a core piece moving forward.
Coyle - Should be traded
Brazeau - Could maybe net a pretty decent return for the Bruins.
H. Lindholm - He has a full NMC and the Bruins are better with him than without him.
McAvoy - NMC
Carlo - Teams always want a top 4RD and since he has term, he would probably net the biggest return for the Bruins at the trade deadline.
If they make the playoffs, then good, let them gain that experience like Lohrei and Beecher did last season. This would be the lineup:
Zacha - Poitras - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Lysell
Merkulov - Frederic - Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Koepke - Beecher - Kastelic
Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - Peake
Lohrei - Wotherspoon
Oesterle
I suppose, but you could throw in something else.No reason for NY to do that. It's negative value for them for an asset.
Not sure who suggested this but I agree no to KreiderNot for Chris Kreider. That’s an absurd suggestion
Like Miller as a player but hate the length of that contract with his age.Add their top two defensemen, get Marchand healthy and add Miller. That's be one hell of a boost and would move the team from bubble club to contender IMO. Now if it can happen is another story.
Hahah.UGGH, .......I also hit the like button, by mistake.
Gonna be honest, that’s a lottery team for 4 years. Even getting a top five each year ages out the core as those guys develop into NHL players while in the AHLIn my opinion, the Bruins have to retool. This team isn't a JT Miller away from competing if they can't consistently defend, break the puck out of their own zone, or make a pass. I'm sure Miller would be happy about that . Apart from the three players you mentioned, a lot of this roster is replaceable. It's doubtful E. Lindholm, Zadorov, and Kastelic are moved since they just signed/re-signed. Marchand is probably a lifer, but he can decide if he wants to get moved at the deadline or not.
1. Retool by trading away players that won't have a future on this team to restock the cupboard and gain cap space.
2. Call up Merkulov and Lysell to play out the rest of the season and get them NHL experience. Let them prove that they can be mainstays on this roster moving forward. If they aren't, maybe they show everyone enough that they can be included in a deal to add to this roster in the offseason ala Spooner.
3. With the extra cap space, aim for a big ticket FA forward, and/or try to make a deal prior to the draft with the assets acquired to add another piece to the roster.
Zacha - On pace for 42pts, is tight with Pastrnak, but if a team gives the Bruins an offer they can't refuse, they should think about it.
Geekie - Was a 4th liner that became a top 9 player last season, and is now on the 1st line. He's on pace for similar numbers he had last season. Would be a great add for a playoff team.
Frederic - It sounds like Sweeney is doing his best to re-sign him so the Bruins identified him as a core piece moving forward.
Coyle - Should be traded
Brazeau - Could maybe net a pretty decent return for the Bruins.
H. Lindholm - He has a full NMC, and the Bruins are better with him than without him.
McAvoy - NMC
Carlo - Teams always want a top 4RD and since he has term, he would probably net the biggest return for the Bruins at the trade deadline.
If they make the playoffs, then good, let them gain that experience like Lohrei and Beecher did last season. This would be the lineup:
Zacha - Poitras - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Lysell
Merkulov - Frederic - Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Koepke - Beecher - Kastelic
Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - Peeke
Lohrei - Wotherspoon
Oesterle
Sweeney saw Marchy didn't play in OT and had to see what in the Hell was going on.
He gives the Bruins four years, I think that is a win. That’s all this core has in them.Like Miller as a player but hate the length of that contract with his age.
I would sell high( whatever high is for him) on Brasseau I think .Teams will want him with his size and reach ( 10 goals 20 pts in 45 gms) .Freddy be gone as well if he not resigned by deadline.Please don't trade for Miller. You don't need to buy, you need to sell! Goodbye Coyle and Goodbye Carlo. Get a couple picks and a prospect for them
In my opinion, the Bruins have to retool. This team isn't a JT Miller away from competing if they can't consistently defend, break the puck out of their own zone, or make a pass. I'm sure Miller would be happy about that . Apart from the three players you mentioned, a lot of this roster is replaceable. It's doubtful E. Lindholm, Zadorov, and Kastelic are moved since they just signed/re-signed. Marchand is probably a lifer, but he can decide if he wants to get moved at the deadline or not.
1. Retool by trading away players that won't have a future on this team to restock the cupboard and gain cap space.
2. Call up Merkulov and Lysell to play out the rest of the season and get them NHL experience. Let them prove that they can be mainstays on this roster moving forward. If they aren't, maybe they show everyone enough that they can be included in a deal to add to this roster in the offseason ala Spooner.
3. With the extra cap space, aim for a big ticket FA forward, and/or try to make a deal prior to the draft with the assets acquired to add another piece to the roster.
Zacha - On pace for 42pts, is tight with Pastrnak, but if a team gives the Bruins an offer they can't refuse, they should think about it.
Geekie - Was a 4th liner that became a top 9 player last season, and is now on the 1st line. He's on pace for similar numbers he had last season. Would be a great add for a playoff team.
Frederic - It sounds like Sweeney is doing his best to re-sign him so the Bruins identified him as a core piece moving forward.
Coyle - Should be traded
Brazeau - Could maybe net a pretty decent return for the Bruins.
H. Lindholm - He has a full NMC, and the Bruins are better with him than without him.
McAvoy - NMC
Carlo - Teams always want a top 4RD and since he has term, he would probably net the biggest return for the Bruins at the trade deadline.
If they make the playoffs, then good, let them gain that experience like Lohrei and Beecher did last season. This would be the lineup:
Zacha - Poitras - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Lysell
Merkulov - Frederic - Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Koepke - Beecher - Kastelic
Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - Peeke
Lohrei - Wotherspoon
Oesterle
Geekie is trending up, so maybe keep him and hope he turns into more....choose between one of Frederick/GeekieIn my opinion, the Bruins have to retool. This team isn't a JT Miller away from competing if they can't consistently defend, break the puck out of their own zone, or make a pass. I'm sure Miller would be happy about that . Apart from the three players you mentioned, a lot of this roster is replaceable. It's doubtful E. Lindholm, Zadorov, and Kastelic are moved since they just signed/re-signed. Marchand is probably a lifer, but he can decide if he wants to get moved at the deadline or not.
1. Retool by trading away players that won't have a future on this team to restock the cupboard and gain cap space.
2. Call up Merkulov and Lysell to play out the rest of the season and get them NHL experience. Let them prove that they can be mainstays on this roster moving forward. If they aren't, maybe they show everyone enough that they can be included in a deal to add to this roster in the offseason ala Spooner.
3. With the extra cap space, aim for a big ticket FA forward, and/or try to make a deal prior to the draft with the assets acquired to add another piece to the roster.
Zacha - On pace for 42pts, is tight with Pastrnak, but if a team gives the Bruins an offer they can't refuse, they should think about it.
Geekie - Was a 4th liner that became a top 9 player last season, and is now on the 1st line. He's on pace for similar numbers he had last season. Would be a great add for a playoff team.
Frederic - It sounds like Sweeney is doing his best to re-sign him so the Bruins identified him as a core piece moving forward.
Coyle - Should be traded
Brazeau - Could maybe net a pretty decent return for the Bruins.
H. Lindholm - He has a full NMC, and the Bruins are better with him than without him.
McAvoy - NMC
Carlo - Teams always want a top 4RD and since he has term, he would probably net the biggest return for the Bruins at the trade deadline.
If they make the playoffs, then good, let them gain that experience like Lohrei and Beecher did last season. This would be the lineup:
Zacha - Poitras - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Lysell
Merkulov - Frederic - Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Koepke - Beecher - Kastelic
Wahlstrom/Lettieri
Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - Peeke
Lohrei - Wotherspoon
Oesterle
I suggested Kreider and I stick by my claim because he would solve many of the issues we are having.Not sure who suggested this but I agree no to Kreider
Geekie is trending up, so maybe keep him and hope he turns into more....choose between one of Frederick/Geekie
Get on offensive D man
His contract makes it easier to give it a shot, he is not going to burden this team for 5-6 more years . I think what the cost to get him would be my biggest concern.I suggested Kreider and I stick by my claim because he would solve many of the issues we are having.
My interest in trading Carlo isn't cause I don't value him, it's cause I think he gets you a really good return and I'm not sure he's gonna be a guy they should look to extend beyond his current contract because of his concussion history. Replacing a top 4 RD is gonna be hard, don't get me wrong. But this team needs to add so much up front to get back into contention that I think they kinda have to make some moves that might hurt a bit.I don't want to trade Brando. Many do. Most don't quite understand how good he is, in his quiet way. You can't make a player something they're not, generally speaking, as Butch observed when speaking of Carlo. He's not a bruiser. He's an intelligent, conservative, solid D with a long reach and a disruptive stick.
Those trades rarely happen through the season and it's because most teams still have a shot at the playoffs and are not yet selling and less to do with cap space. That's what parity is doing.Am I the only one that would like the Bruins to leave more cap space throughout the year ?
I get wanting to spend it all or close to but with the roster holes we have mostly top 6 for the last two years we’re basically staying the same, I’d even say players overachieved last year and with no cap space we can’t actually target the players we need during the season.
IMO there’s discounts to be had on a top 6 player later in a season cause cap space is an asset to have in a trade not only that we have a few younger guys which could’ve been getting experience during this process.