Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
I don’t think it’s a false argument and it has plenty to do with Peeke. When assessing any value in return for a potential Carlo deal you need to factor in the player’s replacement.
If you weaken your defense to improve your offense, have you really improved overall? That’s with the assumption you are trading for a forward.
Let’s say it’s futures, those are great and could be used to flip, but you’ve moved a player to add maybes down the road. If I’m doing that I do it with an expiring contract like Frederic, not Carlo’s. Just my two cents
And who's replacing Peeke?