I mean do you think that Coyle and Frederic are 20 point players? That Zacha and Lindholm are 30 point players? That Pasta is a 70 point player?
They do need another scoring forward obviously and clearly. But there is a lot of missing offense here, too.
Until last year, Coyle was basically a 40 pt. player. To regress on a bad team and advancing in age down to 30? I think it's plausable. I can absolutely see it with Frederic, he doesn't get any PP time and with how poor the Bruins are generating chances at 5 on 5, it's going to hurt his production from years prior.
Zacha it's less likely but I think he needs Pasta to get going to put up numbers close to what he did the last two years. He needs the PP to get going as well to get his numbers up.
Lindholm? The reality is his prime is behind him. He was a 40 pt. guy last year between two teams. Then factor in the adjustment to this team, the motley PP, it will hurt his numbers. 30 is possible. It's only a 10 pt. swing.
Pastrnak? Who the heck knows. He could catch fire, he could be playing hurt, or he could just have an off-year. He's the mostly likely of the group to see his production jump considerably but that shouldn't be surprising.
This team-wide scoring slump is basically 15 games old, that's no longer a small sample size. We keep thinking everything will regress to the mean, I felt the same say 2-3 weeks ago. I'm starting to wonder.