Rumor: - 2026 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: Offseason Edition | Page 76 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: 2026 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: Offseason Edition

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Not sure what the eff Buffalo is doing, just to move up seven spots. Was it for cap space?
Kesselring only played 13 minutes a night during the regular season and was healthy scratched in the postseason.

He wants to be a two-way top 4 guy, whereas Buffalo wanted him to be a bottom pairing shutdown defender. Easier to just move him for the highest bidder now that the rest of the defense is seemingly set.
 
Kesselring only played 13 minutes a night during the regular season and was healthy scratched in the postseason.

He wants to be a two-way top 4 guy, whereas Buffalo wanted him to be a bottom pairing shutdown defender. Easier to just move him for the highest bidder now that the rest of the defense is seemingly set.
I mean, he is a mid-pairing defenceman. I will chalk this up to not working in Ruff's system/aura/etc.
 
I'd like to bring Kulak back to play with Malinski on the 3rd pair, but I'm having a hard time seeing how they can afford a legit #3 LHD type to play on the second pair, if they do that.

Maybe if they move both Val and Nelson, and replace them with cheaper players. Doesn't feel like they'll move Nelson though.

Otherwise, I worry that the Avs still haven't learned their lesson, and may try to get by with another cheap half measure to fix the D core, by playing Kulak on the 2nd pair with Malinski, when IMO we saw that both shouldn't be playing higher than the 3rd pair in the playoffs on a contender.

They need to commit to bringing in a legitimate #3D to play with Manson on the 2nd pair, the way they committed to finding a 2C.
 
I'd like to bring Kulak back to play with Malinski on the 3rd pair, but I'm having a hard time seeing how they can afford a legit #3 LHD type to play on the second pair, if they do that.

Do you believe Manson to be the second pairing RD?

I think Malinski is firmly ahead of him on the depth chart.

IMO:

Toews - Makar
??? - Malinski
??? - Manson
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex Jones
Swap Nuke for Rielly with 1M retained. Sign Kulak 5 X 4M

Toews - Makar
Rielly - Manson
Kulak - Malinski

Done
 
  • Wow
Reactions: shadow1
Do you believe Manson to be the second pairing RD?

I think Malinski is firmly ahead of him on the depth chart.

IMO:

Toews - Makar
??? - Malinski
??? - Manson

In the playoffs, I play Manson ahead of Malinski every time.

Manson is built for the playoffs. Malinski's game hasn't shown that.

Regular season, Malinski can play higher in the depth chart if they want, but he needs to be sheltered more in the playoffs, so he doesn't get bad matchups.

They don't really need to do that with Manson, especially if he has a good partner. Manson's only issue is staying healthy.

On a contender, I want my entire top 4, including the 2nd pair, to be solid defensively.

They've tried the other route before pairing Girard with Manson, or Malsinski with Kulak, and it doesn't work, because with Girard and Malinski facing better players on the 2nd pair, they find ways to out muscle them, or exploit their flaws defensively, and their partner can't cover for them all the time.

I want this. They can swap Kulak for Gagne if they can't afford him, and then re-evaluate at the deadline.

Toews - Makar
XX - Manson
Kulak - Malinski
 
  • Like
Reactions: missionAvs
For @RoyIsALegend

Screenshot_20260617-202230.png
Screenshot_20260617-202201.png
Screenshot_20260617-202221.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad