Boston Bruins - 2026 OFFSEASON Roster & Salary Cap III. | Page 13 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Boston Bruins 2026 OFFSEASON Roster & Salary Cap III.

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
Want to know what is relevant for his family life? The security of knowing your likely not having to pack up and move your family again for awhile.

If some team had offered him a full NMC for all 6 years he's not a Bruin.

We'll never know that. But judging from what I know of the player, Zadorov seems to be a straight shooter and isn't bull shitting when he says that being an Original 6 team was a draw to him for coming here. Were other factors in play? Absolutely.
 
We'll never know that. But judging from what I know of the player, Zadorov seems to be a straight shooter and isn't bull shitting when he says that being an Original 6 team was a draw to him for coming here. Were other factors in play? Absolutely.
Yeah, there are a million different reasons why someone might choose to live, work, or relocate somewhere, and we're debating it as if there's a universal answer.

Zadorov probably views these things very differently than Mittelstadt. Even something as simple as proximity to Europe could matter a lot to one player and not at all to another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC
What I said was IF they lose this cup, they will potentially be the next "only one cup with this core?" group, alongside what might be the Avs. But nobody thinks the Avs and Vegas have been disappointing. And I dont think our franchise was either with that same mindset. It's that tough a league.

The "only because they are a no tax state" thing is wild. Look where the cups are going.

Tampa
Florida
Vegas
etc...

If we don't start acknowleding what this advantage does man, I dunno. The last 6 cups go

Tax state
Tax state
Tax state
American tax state that's WAY more favorable than most
Tax state
Tax state

We going to wake up to this, or nah? Players, their families, and their agents are all about these states for the most important reason to these guys now. The original 6 are NOT the prime destinations anymore.
While there is no doubt that players clearly may prefer to go to tax advantaged states compared to some other markets, I don't think its the main factor as to why those teams have won. It most certainly contributed in a way because those teams are probably always on a teams preferred list but:

Tampa: generational goalie, winger, defenseman, all draft. Oh ya and Brayden point also drafted 3rd round. McDonagh and Hagel traded for
Colorado: sucked for years then drafted generational players in McKinnon and Makar.
Vegas: hyper aggressive team who has traded for half their roster. Mitch Marner clearly wanted to go there so we'll see how that pans out. But the team has made many amazing trades. I won't credit tax advantages for those balls. They will pay eventually. 2 first round picks and 0 2nd round picks in 4 next years.
Florida: Generational center. Again, ultra aggressive and successful trades. Bennet and Reinhart trades. Verhaeghe FA. Forsling Waivers. You could argue M Tkachuk and Jones forced his way to a tax a advantaged state? But I'd argue Jones wanted to join a proven winner.

The common denominator to me is GMs that have been aggressive and prolific. Not Players fleeing for more money. although it certainly doesn't hurt. Those teams made those players after they landed there. Except for maybe Marner and Tkachuk
Bruins weren't in on any of those trades but could have been. McDonagh? Oops. Stone? Oops. Eichel? Oops. Barbashev? Oops. Hertl? Oops. Pietrangelo? Oops. Martinez? Oops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackFrancis
Even without touching Letourneau, Hagens, or the Florida, Toronto, and 2028 Boston first-round picks, I think Boston still has enough assets to put together competitive offers for players like Hronek, Barzal, or Thomas if they ever become available.

Thomas feels extremely unlikely to me.

But something like Lohrei + Lysell + Simpson + Boston's 2027 1st for Hronek feels reasonably competitive. Likewise, Geekie + Zellers + a 2026 1st and 2nd for Barzal doesn't strike me as an unserious offer.

I'd do the Hronek deal, although I'd hate giving up Simpson. NFW on the Geekie and a TON for Barzal. That's a laughably bad deal for Boston. Maybe Barzal is a slightly better player than Geekie, but 39 goals sure wouldn't get replaced by him, and he's just not anywhere close to that much better,
 
Boston/ MA and New England are some of the top states in the country for education, and health and to live in. They may be more expensive, but quality of life is so good people (especially if they can afford it) choose to live here.

It seems like most love living in Boston. Some stay here after they retire (Bergy, Z, Tuukka and others)
Education and health care is declining, at one time your statement may have been true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngryMilkcrates
Wonder if we could get a deal together involving Pettersson for E. Lindholm as a base. High risk possible high reward. E Lindholm isn't going to give you much more, Petterrson at his worst is better than him. Wonder what else it would take
It would take Elias Lindholm to waive his NTC to go back to a place he doesn’t want to be for a franchise that is in worse shape than any franchise in the NHL
 
It would take Elias Lindholm to waive his NTC to go back to a place he doesn’t want to be for a franchise that is in worse shape than any franchise in the NHL
giphy.gif
 
Education and health care is declining, at one time your statement may have been true.
Country wide yes, it is in decline BUT New England states are still rated highly for health and education



The top states for education in 2026 are led by Massachusetts, followed by Connecticut, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, Minnesota, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Maryland. These rankings consider both K-12 performance (standardized test scores, graduation rates, class size, and school safety) and higher education metrics (college graduation rates, costs, and percentage of residents with degrees) World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+1. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New Jersey are particularly notable for their high-quality public schools and strong educational attainment among adults World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+1.​


States Excelling in Both Health and Education​

Several states appear in the top 10 for both categories, indicating strong overall quality of life:

  • Massachusetts – #1 in education, #2 in health
  • New Hampshire – #4 in education, #1 in health
  • Connecticut – #2 in education, #4 in health
  • Vermont – #6 in education, #3 in health
  • New Jersey – #3 in education, top 10 in health metrics
    These states combine high educational attainment, strong school systems, and excellent healthcare access, making them ideal for families, students, and individuals seeking a healthy lifestyle World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+3.

Healthiest States​

According to the 2025 America’s Health Rankings and Commonwealth Fund reports, the top states for health are New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut, Utah, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Washington, and the District of Columbia. These rankings are based on social and economic factors, behaviors, clinical care, physical environment, and health outcomes, including access to care, preventive services, and healthy behaviors americashealthrankings.orgamericashealthrankings.org+1. New Hampshire leads in overall health, excelling in social and economic factors, behaviors, and clinical care americashealthrankings.orgamericashealthrankings.org.

Summary​

For those prioritizing both health and education, the Northeastern states dominate, with Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Vermont, and New Jersey consistently ranking at the top. These states offer a combination of high-quality schools, strong educational outcomes, and robust healthcare systems, reflecting a high standard of living and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
 
We're a little light on skill in the top 6 on the wing......I also forget Lindholm hahahaha. Kind of a key piece I suppose. I'm just thinking maybe Poitras ends up a winger if he's to crack this team, we have Zacha-Minten-Lindholm-Hagens-Letourneau- and assumingly a new top 1C at some point.

If Poitras ends up a winger, it will certainly be on the right wing.
 
What Vegas is doing isn't really ground-breaking stuff.

They aren't blowing their high picks and prospects on rentals. If they move picks/prospects its for established players who they plan to have around for awhile. Plan being the appropriate word as they aren't afraid to pivot if need be.

And they aren't getting involved in the mid-tier UFA market where the Bruins like to shop. The go to the store where the big fish reside like Pietrangelo and Marner.

Meanwhile Sweeney has spent significant draft and prospect capital on rentals (Orlov, Bertuzzi, Nash, etc.) and spent term/cap space on guys who aren't true difference makers (Elias, Backes, Beleskey, etc. etc. etc.).
You are on a roll today.
 
Blues have three 1st round picks this year

They want a under 30 year old center to slot behind Robert Thomas and I threw out Mittelstadt for #29 and didn’t get ripped apart (so far lol)

Would anyone else do Mitts for #29?

Could take two stabs on defenseman.

I'd do this move. Not sure I would take 2 shots at a defenseman in the first. But 29 would get you a chance to go after a Blyl, Piiuparinen, Or Gojer. All guys I think would be major reaches at 23. Maybe even trade back a few spots from there to get one from that group
 
  • Like
Reactions: CellyHard
Nothing against those guys, but it's notable that the Bruins have taken care of Nutter, Sweezey, and Reichel before addressing RFAs with larger roles or greater long-term potential.

They're also very easy deals to get done. I can't imagine Sweeney & Co spent much time working those deals. The fact that they're two-way deals points the players understanding that they are AHL level players and happy to still be playing the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeIsAStud
Country wide yes, it is in decline BUT New England states are still rated highly for health and education



The top states for education in 2026 are led by Massachusetts, followed by Connecticut, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, Minnesota, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Maryland. These rankings consider both K-12 performance (standardized test scores, graduation rates, class size, and school safety) and higher education metrics (college graduation rates, costs, and percentage of residents with degrees) World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+1. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New Jersey are particularly notable for their high-quality public schools and strong educational attainment among adults World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+1.​


States Excelling in Both Health and Education​

Several states appear in the top 10 for both categories, indicating strong overall quality of life:

  • Massachusetts – #1 in education, #2 in health
  • New Hampshire – #4 in education, #1 in health
  • Connecticut – #2 in education, #4 in health
  • Vermont – #6 in education, #3 in health
  • New Jersey – #3 in education, top 10 in health metrics
    These states combine high educational attainment, strong school systems, and excellent healthcare access, making them ideal for families, students, and individuals seeking a healthy lifestyle World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+3.

Healthiest States​

According to the 2025 America’s Health Rankings and Commonwealth Fund reports, the top states for health are New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut, Utah, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Washington, and the District of Columbia. These rankings are based on social and economic factors, behaviors, clinical care, physical environment, and health outcomes, including access to care, preventive services, and healthy behaviors americashealthrankings.orgamericashealthrankings.org+1. New Hampshire leads in overall health, excelling in social and economic factors, behaviors, and clinical care americashealthrankings.orgamericashealthrankings.org.

Summary​

For those prioritizing both health and education, the Northeastern states dominate, with Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Vermont, and New Jersey consistently ranking at the top. These states offer a combination of high-quality schools, strong educational outcomes, and robust healthcare systems, reflecting a high standard of living and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
Great, I am glad you researched all that, now I suggest you go out and talk to people that are dealing with the decline in health care in this state, and this is not a knock on the healthcare workers. Then go and talk to the parents and students, that dealing with failing education system. Side note you can put all the numbers you want out there but, question, who put them together, and what motives they have behind those numbers
 
Nothing against those guys, but it's notable that the Bruins have taken care of Nutter, Sweezey, and Reichel before addressing RFAs with larger roles or greater long-term potential.
These might just be easier deals….


Arvi got an article posted about him on the bruins site. I think he is getting signed because of that. Why waste the resources to write an article if they have no plan to keep him.


There is never a rush with a RFA. They can’t exactly just walk away.
 
Great, I am glad you researched all that, now I suggest you go out and talk to people that are dealing with the decline in health care in this state, and this is not a knock on the healthcare workers. Then go and talk to the parents and students, that dealing with failing education system. Side note you can put all the numbers you want out there but, question, who put them together, and what motives they have behind those numbers
Hockey players kids go to private school and definitely get private healthcare. I’m not sure it matters. The universities are obviously on the highest tier but why would that matter to players? They can just send their kid to what ever school their kid chooses because they have the money.
 
Hockey players kids go to private school and definitely get private healthcare. I’m not sure it matters. The universities are obviously on the highest tier but why would that matter to players? They can just send their kid to what ever school their kid chooses because they have the money.
Don't tell me, inform those who believe that is heavy motive for players to sign here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kegs
Don't tell me, inform those who believe that is heavy motive for players to sign here.
Country wide yes, it is in decline BUT New England states are still rated highly for health and education



The top states for education in 2026 are led by Massachusetts, followed by Connecticut, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, Minnesota, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Maryland. These rankings consider both K-12 performance (standardized test scores, graduation rates, class size, and school safety) and higher education metrics (college graduation rates, costs, and percentage of residents with degrees) World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+1. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New Jersey are particularly notable for their high-quality public schools and strong educational attainment among adults World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+1.​


States Excelling in Both Health and Education​

Several states appear in the top 10 for both categories, indicating strong overall quality of life:

  • Massachusetts – #1 in education, #2 in health
  • New Hampshire – #4 in education, #1 in health
  • Connecticut – #2 in education, #4 in health
  • Vermont – #6 in education, #3 in health
  • New Jersey – #3 in education, top 10 in health metrics
    These states combine high educational attainment, strong school systems, and excellent healthcare access, making them ideal for families, students, and individuals seeking a healthy lifestyle World Population ReviewWorld Population Review+3.

Healthiest States​

According to the 2025 America’s Health Rankings and Commonwealth Fund reports, the top states for health are New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut, Utah, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Washington, and the District of Columbia. These rankings are based on social and economic factors, behaviors, clinical care, physical environment, and health outcomes, including access to care, preventive services, and healthy behaviors americashealthrankings.orgamericashealthrankings.org+1. New Hampshire leads in overall health, excelling in social and economic factors, behaviors, and clinical care americashealthrankings.orgamericashealthrankings.org.

Summary​

For those prioritizing both health and education, the Northeastern states dominate, with Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Vermont, and New Jersey consistently ranking at the top. These states offer a combination of high-quality schools, strong educational outcomes, and robust healthcare systems, reflecting a high standard of living and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
Hockey players kids go to private school and definitely get private healthcare. I’m not sure it matters. The universities are obviously on the highest tier but why would that matter to players? They can just send their kid to what ever school their kid chooses because they have the money.
 
What Vegas is doing isn't really ground-breaking stuff.

They aren't blowing their high picks and prospects on rentals. If they move picks/prospects its for established players who they plan to have around for awhile. Plan being the appropriate word as they aren't afraid to pivot if need be.

And they aren't getting involved in the mid-tier UFA market where the Bruins like to shop. The go to the store where the big fish reside like Pietrangelo and Marner.

Meanwhile Sweeney has spent significant draft and prospect capital on rentals (Orlov, Bertuzzi, Nash, etc.) and spent term/cap space on guys who aren't true difference makers (Elias, Backes, Beleskey, etc. etc. etc.).
Astute observations. A couple things I’d say though:

1. I don’t mind rentals at the deadline for true Cup contenders, like the 23 run we made.

2. Yes making trades for established talent with term is ideal, and Vegas is good at it. But it’s also a lot harder as there aren’t typically a lot of quality players available with term that teams are willing to trade. And you need young talent to offer, and that’s typically sparse in this org.

3. Your final point is so spot on. It’s the mediocre, JAGish players like Jeannot, Eyesimmont, etc where Sweeney consistently shops and these guys barely make a difference. The list of guys he’s overpaid due to their UFA status is long. And while he’s not alone in the GM space for that, I’d much rather he overspend on the high end guys and wait for them to become available. Keep some powder dry, akin to the Savard/Chara summer, and overpay for true difference makers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad