2026 NHL Draft | Page 153 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2026 NHL Draft

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
You're judging without even considering the details.

Would it really be stupid if we traded 8 to the Blues for 11 and 15?
what's the likely hood that we get offered the 15th pick to move down 3 spots?

according to pick calculator we would need to add the 22nd overall pick to make that a fair trade...

just pick the best player at 8, the tier of players were in goes from 2-9, don't drop out of that tier for a lesser prospect just to pick up an extra pick that won't be anywhere near what you suggested
 
Last edited:
You're judging without even considering the details.

Would it really be stupid if we traded 8 to the Blues for 11 and 15?
Considering there is a consensus top 2 then a consensus top 9 and everything after that is mid-range prospects - yes it would be stupid
 
the only place the speculated the jets trading down in the draft was some random a.i bot pushing out articles lol
 
#8 for #16 and #18 is close from a value perspective in this draft, i think.

Bjorck vs Command AND Morozov

It's not stupid for sure. If we were fully in rebuild mode, I might do it. As we aren't, I'd probably stick with Bjorck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd
#8 for #16 and #18 is close from a value perspective in this draft, i think.

Bjorck vs Command AND Morozov

It's not stupid for sure. If we were fully in rebuild mode, I might do it. As we aren't, I'd probably stick with Bjorck.
8 for 16 and 18 in a string of recent drafts.

Zach Werenski or Barzal and Chabot
Alex Nylander or Chychrun and Stanley
Casey Mittelstadt or Valimaki and Vaakanainen
Adam Boqvist or Kaut and Foudy
Philip Broberg or Newhook and Harley
Jack Quinn or Guhle and Mercer
Brandt Clarke or Othmann and Lucius
 
jets need actual talent, picking in the top 8 is the best way to do that, look at this draft, there are mckenna/stenberg then their is a tier of 7 players all similarly ranked, every mock draft has them in a different order, we could end up with the best player in the draft staying where we are, trading down and going into the next tier of player to grab a lesser prospect with a higher chance to bust is not the answer
 
Wow. I think it's a big overpay by the Blues and I'd be all over this if possible.
8 for 13 and 15 would be a laughably good deal for us. Draft tiers are one thing, not like trading tiers of established players. There is probably a 40% chance 15th ends up better than 8th and the 13th pick is pure gravy at that point.

Sure you could lose the trade. But if you make that trade you will come out ahead 3/4 of the time for sure
 
8 for 13 and 15 would be a laughably good deal for us. Draft tiers are one thing, not like trading tiers of established players. There is probably a 40% chance 15th ends up better than 8th and the 13th pick is pure gravy at that point.

Sure you could lose the trade. But if you make that trade you will come out ahead 3/4 of the time for sure
Like what are the odds that if the Jets traded the pick that became Dax Rudolph for Alexander Command and Ryan Lin. You probably have a 55-60% chance on getting the best player in the trade because you get two kicks at the can. And then you get another top 15 pick on top of that. Even if its an eventual bust its still a prospect you can trade.

I know this is not the way Chevy GM's...but these are the odds behind trades like these.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd
Wow. I think it's a big overpay by the Blues and I'd be all over this if possible.

Based on pure positional values it would be an overpay by StL. But it isn't that simple. Those values, averaged over many years, don't necessarily represent the value of the positions in any one draft.

The flat values in this year's top 9-10 might skew the calculation. At 8 I think we might well get a real difference maker. 11 and 15 will give us 2 pretty good prospects but with a lot less chance of being that difference maker.

The most recently updated version of the consolidated rankings have Rudolph at 11 and Malte Gustafsson at 16. I was fantasizing about a L/R pair of Dmen at 8&9 if Smits was already gone. I thought I would take Rudolph and Gustafsson. So I don't think it would be stupid from Jets POV. I do think it would be too risky for Chevy. It might be stupid from Blues POV.
 
I think Cam's Consensus is more meaningful than consolidated rankings.
Screenshot_20260613-134232.png
 
jets need actual talent, picking in the top 8 is the best way to do that, look at this draft, there are mckenna/stenberg then their is a tier of 7 players all similarly ranked, every mock draft has them in a different order, we could end up with the best player in the draft staying where we are, trading down and going into the next tier of player to grab a lesser prospect with a higher chance to bust is not the answer

I agree. We need quality even more than we need quantity. But I think it is unfair to call dropping back to 11 and 15 stupid. It is a reasonable suggestion, if Blues would do it. I don't think they would, unless there was someone still available at 8 that they really wanted. We could end up with the same player at 11 as we would have taken at 8.
 
I agree. We need quality even more than we need quantity. But I think it is unfair to call dropping back to 11 and 15 stupid. It is a reasonable suggestion, if Blues would do it. I don't think they would, unless there was someone still available at 8 that they really wanted. We could end up with the same player at 11 as we would have taken at 8.
holy shit I said dropping back is stupid and then someone said it wasn't stupid and suggested an unrealistic trade rofl

if you go by pick value calculator the add to #11 would be #40 for fair value
 
Daxon Rudolph still hasn't committed to the NCAA yet?

If you are the interview process, and a player wants to make it to the show immediately, would it carry any weight for the Jets to have a player in TC in his draft year at this point? As part of the integration process.

If Salomonsson misses the start of TC and the season would it be beneficial to have a player who could do the 9 game trial and come back at the end of the junior season, or do you want a player coming out of college for the playoffs?

So far Bjorck, Rudolph, Belchetz have the best chance of starting with the Jets immediately in that 8 spot.
 
Daxon Rudolph still hasn't committed to the NCAA yet?

If you are the interview process, and a player wants to make it to the show immediately, would it carry any weight for the Jets to have a player in TC in his draft year at rgus point ? As part of the integration process.

If Salomonsson misses the start of TC and the season would it be beneficial to have a player who could do the 9 game trial and come back at the end of the junior season, or do you want a player coming out of college for the playoffs?

So far Bjorck, Rudolph, Belchetz have the best chance of starting with the Jets immediately in that 8 spot.
 
Daxon Rudolph still hasn't committed to the NCAA yet?

If you are the interview process, and a player wants to make it to the show immediately, would it carry any weight for the Jets to have a player in TC in his draft year at this point? As part of the integration process.

If Salomonsson misses the start of TC and the season would it be beneficial to have a player who could do the 9 game trial and come back at the end of the junior season, or do you want a player coming out of college for the playoffs?

So far Bjorck, Rudolph, Belchetz have the best chance of starting with the Jets immediately in that 8 spot.
Id say Bjorck, Belchetz and Smits. Rudolph im pretty sure is going to Denver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: voyageur


Damn that's quite a raid of the WHL.
There goes my plan.

I thought this interview with Rudolph was really good. Talks about his strengths but also what he wants to work on (first few steps). I really liked his answer on why College hockey he mentions that Makar (and another name) both played in College for two seasons and its a chance to play against older players, and also do more training in the Gym (due to schedule), and get ready to step into the NHL was well answered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: voyageur

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad