2026 NHL Draft Thread | Page 148 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2026 NHL Draft Thread

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Listen to Brad talk about Rudolph. He gives a very fair evaluation of him. I maybe the only person that actively wants to stay away from Rudolph here and I found this to be very interesting since a lot of people disagree. Given where they rank him at 10 they are still much higher on him then I am.


Was just listening to that. Definitely agree with what they’re saying. The closer we get to the draft and actually going up and taking one of these guys becomes more real the less appealing Rudolph looks.
 
I doubt i really want to pay the price to move up into the top 7ish picks of this draft, let alone the price to move to #2. An alternate idea i have is to target NJ at 12 in order to pick B2B at 11 &12. I still like guys in this range and getting two of them sounds enticing: Lawerence, Gustafsson, Cullen, Rudolph.

My offer would be: 15 & 29 for 12 & 44.

Most draft pick value charts have this slightly in the favor of NJ already, but I would include a 3rd if needed to get it across the line. Don't mind paying a premium, as i like the top 12-13 prospects a bit more than the rest.
 
Was just listening to that. Definitely agree with what they’re saying. The closer we get to the draft and actually going up and taking one of these guys becomes more real the less appealing Rudolph looks.
He's a big project IMO. I also found it interesting that Jerome says he is PP1 guy, but they didn't mention he played the half wall. I see hope or maybe even ideally that he becomes a be a PP1 guy, but I guess I want to see at the next level before I just assume he will be. I don't think he is as skilled as you need to be to play the half wall in the NHL. He is also very much a risk taker on the blue line and I think that could be a problem if he is at the top of the umbrella. But what do I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LGB
He could be. I'm a believe that Gus could play NHL next season. He won't but that is a NHL defenseman already and he would be an excellent 2nd pair guy behind Broberg eventually. Hell maybe even a Gus - Jiricek combo would eventually be our 1st pair.

I will say I like Lindstein and the way he approaches the game. Doesn't try to do to much and I like that kind of reliability. I also think Ralph is a future 3rd pair guy. Fortunately even if we get Gus we don't have to trade Lindstein, but he might have decent value in a trade.
The best part is there’d be absolutely no rush to make a trade anytime soon. Gus wouldn’t be playing in the NHL this season while Lindstein almost certainly would.

If they drafted Gus, the Blues could play Lindstein this season and then reassess about a year from now. By then, Lindstein’s trade value should be higher than it is today as I bet he’s more established as a legit NHLer by then. We’ll have a better idea of what we have in Ralph, Fischer, Koromyslov, Buchinger, Gaudet and the seemingly 1000 other LDs we have by then too. If one or more develop well but we just don’t appear to have room for them, they can then be part of a trade to improve another part of the roster.

Eventually, a lot of these guys will start running into each other and we won’t have spots for all of them but that day isn’t today and drafting Gus wouldn’t change that as he’s likely to stay in Sweden another year, maybe even 2. But we will eventually need to cut bait or trade away some of these guys so if any of them want to really play for the Blues or another NHL team, now’s the time to take a step and impress some folks around the league.

My preference is to draft players on Friday we have more of a need for organizationally but this is also why teams tend to draft BPA - let the cards fall and then trade players from areas of excess for players in areas of need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LGB and ExJbeck
Listen to Brad talk about Rudolph. He gives a very fair evaluation of him. I maybe the only person that actively wants to stay away from Rudolph here and I found this to be very interesting since a lot of people disagree. Given where they rank him at 10 they are still much higher on him then I am.


This whole podcast is great. Wanted to also comment on their analysis of Smits. It seems like Smits could be a faller and a guy we could nab with a small trade up or even at 11. With him it’s all about hockey sense and I totally agree that he doesn’t see the ice very well. However, with a player as toolsy as he is I think he will be able to adapt over time. One of the things they talk about is his play in the OZ. I totally agree he plays straight up weird in the OZ. He activates down the wall often and ends up generating nothing. However, he has a good shot and skates really well. All he has to do is use his skating, find a lane and get a shot to the net. I’d expect he’ll adapt and stop with the ineffective activations and just use his tools to his advantage. They talk about his transition play in the same vein. I would say he’s similar to Parayko in a way. Even if they can’t see the ice all that well they can just do everything themselves so it doesn’t really matter. I’d be pretty happy if we came out of the draft with Smits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExJbeck
Is it bad that I love Adam Jiricek and lindstein enough on top of Broberg that I really don't care for any of the D outside of maybe Verhoeff(would prob require a trade up) or Gustafsson(at 15 not 11) for us? We've gotta be dead set on going after as much high end fwd talent as we can get right?
This is my thought as well. I like Gus at 15, but am not sure I go LHD at 11. We have Koromyslov, Fischer, Ralph all leading that position at Springfield next year and Lindstein in our 3rd pair right now. You pick BPA usually, but that really does not trip as a principal need. If we got Lawrence, Hemming and Gus at those spots I would be so happy I could spot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DatDude44
I doubt i really want to pay the price to move up into the top 7ish picks of this draft, let alone the price to move to #2. An alternate idea i have is to target NJ at 12 in order to pick B2B at 11 &12. I still like guys in this range and getting two of them sounds enticing: Lawerence, Gustafsson, Cullen, Rudolph.

My offer would be: 15 & 29 for 12 & 44.

Most draft pick value charts have this slightly in the favor of NJ already, but I would include a 3rd if needed to get it across the line. Don't mind paying a premium, as i like the top 12-13 prospects a bit more than the rest.
I think I would rather go 15 and 75 for 12. Perri says that this would still lean NJ.
 
Looking at the plethora of drafts out there, it seems that even the updated ones think we need more 3rd line centers. Gastrin, Suter, Jecho, Korotky, Dean, Mrsic. McMichael.....seems like in one form or another this is no longer a desperate area.
 
This whole podcast is great. Wanted to also comment on their analysis of Smits. It seems like Smits could be a faller and a guy we could nab with a small trade up or even at 11. With him it’s all about hockey sense and I totally agree that he doesn’t see the ice very well. However, with a player as toolsy as he is I think he will be able to adapt over time. One of the things they talk about is his play in the OZ. I totally agree he plays straight up weird in the OZ. He activates down the wall often and ends up generating nothing. However, he has a good shot and skates really well. All he has to do is use his skating, find a lane and get a shot to the net. I’d expect he’ll adapt and stop with the ineffective activations and just use his tools to his advantage. They talk about his transition play in the same vein. I would say he’s similar to Parayko in a way. Even if they can’t see the ice all that well they can just do everything themselves so it doesn’t really matter. I’d be pretty happy if we came out of the draft with Smits.
Oddly enough, I was going to use CP55 to comp Smits level of effectiveness in the offensive zone. It's not the exact same, but you don't have huge offensive upside. And honestly that is ok with me. I'd like to see some stats on his passing efficiency that they were talking about and compare it to other players. I do think he is the most NHL ready defender. I do not think he has the same ceiling as guys ahead of him and I can understand why teams would pass on the high floor guy for the high ceiling guy if you believe that can be good enough defensively on their own eventually or generate enough offense to make up for the lack of defensive effectiveness. Like a Rudolph or Verhoeff for example. I do wonder with Smits if he blossoms a bit more offensively once he is on a team with better players? Kind of like how Otto Stenberg looks better at the NHL level then AHL if that makes sense.
 
IMG_4171.jpeg


I don’t mind Suvanto at all but this would make me cry lmao…..
 
Not to kick a dead horse but it really is crazy how much value we lost on our late run. If we end up trading up really high we might have to use 3 additional firsts (two of which are in the teens) just to get back to a spot we held post-Olympics. Brutal. I've been pretty pro trading up but all four is A LOT. I'm on the fence.


The team that finished 31st got the 4th overall pick this year.

Which is relevant because the league has become convinced that McKenna/Stenberg are going 1-2. So much so that Chicago traded away the 4th specifically because they became convinced that their target (Stenberg) would be picked 2nd. The current league valuation of picks appears to have priced in a pretty significant value drop after the 2nd pick.

Not to keep kicking the dead horse, but this is part of the reason tanking is so dangerous. Vancouver sucked out loud this year and missed out on the top tier draft pick duo. Chicago was the clear 2nd worst team (again, lol) and also missed out on that tier of value. The 1st overall pick went to 28th. 2nd overall went to 24th. We finished just 1 point up on finishing 24th and being the team that won the lottery for pick #2. We were legitimately closer to pick #2 where we finished than had we finished dead last.

Don't get me wrong, holding the 4th would be better than 11th. But the surge didn't cost us pick #2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fez Whatley
Oddly enough, I was going to use CP55 to comp Smits level of effectiveness in the offensive zone. It's not the exact same, but you don't have huge offensive upside. And honestly that is ok with me. I'd like to see some stats on his passing efficiency that they were talking about and compare it to other players. I do think he is the most NHL ready defender. I do not think he has the same ceiling as guys ahead of him and I can understand why teams would pass on the high floor guy for the high ceiling guy if you believe that can be good enough defensively on their own eventually or generate enough offense to make up for the lack of defensive effectiveness. Like a Rudolph or Verhoeff for example. I do wonder with Smits if he blossoms a bit more offensively once he is on a team with better players? Kind of like how Otto Stenberg looks better at the NHL level then AHL if that makes sense.
I don't think so personally because I think that’s related to hockey sense. When you have better players around you and they’re seeing the same thing you are you can play off of them better. With Smits I do think there is potential for growth thought but it will have to come from improving his sense which he can do to some extent with good coaching. At least to eliminate things from his game that are ineffective like his weird activations. I think he has more potential in the OZ than Parayko because he has better hands and more lateral mobility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExJbeck
The team that finished 31st got the 4th overall pick this year.

Which is relevant because the league has become convinced that McKenna/Stenberg are going 1-2. So much so that Chicago traded away the 4th specifically because they became convinced that their target (Stenberg) would be picked 2nd. The current league valuation of picks appears to have priced in a pretty significant value drop after the 2nd pick.

Not to keep kicking the dead horse, but this is part of the reason tanking is so dangerous. Vancouver sucked out loud this year and missed out on the top tier draft pick duo. Chicago was the clear 2nd worst team (again, lol) and also missed out on that tier of value. The 1st overall pick went to 28th. 2nd overall went to 24th. We finished just 1 point up on finishing 24th and being the team that won the lottery for pick #2. We were legitimately closer to pick #2 where we finished than had we finished dead last.

Don't get me wrong, holding the 4th would be better than 11th. But the surge didn't cost us pick #2.
4th is still SIGNIFICANTLY more valuable than 11th. Any way you paint it we lost a ton of value.
 
I don't think so personally because I think that’s related to hockey sense. When you have better players around you and they’re seeing the same thing you are you can play off of them better. With Smits I do think there is potential for growth thought but it will have to come from improving his sense which he can do to some extent with good coaching. At least to eliminate things from his game that are ineffective like his weird activations. I think he has more potential in the OZ than Parayko because he has better hands and more lateral mobility.
Good point. Will be interesting to see how he develops even if he isn't on roster. Does he ever become more than a shutdown style 2nd pair guy. The offense/hockey sense is definitely one of the biggest if not biggest thing for him to improve on IMO. They also mentioned some things about Broberg comparing the two. Not stylistically just how they view/viewed the offensive potential in both guys. Thought that was interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LGB
View attachment 1258848

I don’t mind Suvanto at all but this would make me cry lmao…..
I actually like it and would be telling people we killed it with those picks. Not as high on many of the guys after this other than Klepov and Command. I would maybe choose to skip a center here depending on how confident they are in Gastrin panning out as 3C. Would probably prefer Kelpov to Suvanto in that scenario, but we wouldn't have to worry about our defense in the future given what already have and adding those two guys. Kelpov because I believe he has the best chance of being top 6 forward in the future. And as much as it pains me to say it, if we do go Malte, then a center I'm probably passing on Lin in favor of Klepov because we need more high end talent. Better to take chance here then in the 3rd where we can still grab a RD that can potentially be a 3rd pair guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PerryTurnbullfan
I actually like it and would be telling people we killed it with those picks. Not as high on many of the guys after this other than Klepov and Command. I would maybe choose to skip a center here depending on how confident they are in Gastrin panning out as 3C. Would probably prefer Kelpov to Suvanto in that scenario, but we wouldn't have to worry about our defense in the future given what already have and adding those two guys. Kelpov because I believe he has the best chance of being top 6 forward in the future. And as much as it pains me to say it, if we do go Malte, then a center I'm probably passing on Lin in favor of Klepov because we need more high end talent. Better to take chance here then in the 3rd where we can still grab a RD that can potentially be a 3rd pair guy.
I really don't want ryan lin, we have jiricek. If that was Command, then i'm in.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad