Rumor: 2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency | The Aftermath
- Thread starter forsbergavs32
- Start date
-
We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.
What This Means for You:
- If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
- If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
- Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
It’s like when my mother-in-law comes over while I’m at work to clean and rearrange the house and I don’t know where anything is.
Bill Peckerskull
Fargin' Icehole
LTCPain75
Registered User
There's one on Posch Spice here.
Isak Posch - Stats, Contract, Salary & More
Eliteprospects.com hockey player profile of Isak Posch, 2002-01-31 Umeå, SWE Sweden. Most recently in the NCAA with St. Cloud State Univ.. Complete player biography and stats.
www.eliteprospects.com
There isn't one on Gay, he put up 30 points in 35 games his final NCAA season.
LOFIN
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2011
- 13,268
- 17,762
Glorious meme names. A wild west hero, and an upper-class guy from Chelsea.
Richard88
John 3:16
- Jun 29, 2019
- 19,390
- 21,345
Listened to the DNVR mailbag podcast and they talked about Malinski's next contract. AJ made the point that Malinski had a stretch this season with 2 points in 42 games so he wouldn't have much of an argument for a big raise, so he'd just QO him.
I looked at the stats myself and he did indeed have that stretch of 2 points in 42 games. Or even worse, 1 point in 37 games (11/11 to 2/4), a span where he played 721shifts with 564:28 TOI.
QO'ing him would save some cap next season but would walk Malinski straight to UFA do that probably doesn't make sense imo. It would be one way to save ~$500k of capspace though, which could be important.
I looked at the stats myself and he did indeed have that stretch of 2 points in 42 games. Or even worse, 1 point in 37 games (11/11 to 2/4), a span where he played 721shifts with 564:28 TOI.
QO'ing him would save some cap next season but would walk Malinski straight to UFA do that probably doesn't make sense imo. It would be one way to save ~$500k of capspace though, which could be important.
- Aug 28, 2009
- 7,302
- 4,290
The Avs will likely do what’s necessary to make next years team good enough to make a run again. If they can get Nelson signed, they have a legitimate chance of going into the season with all the major pieces in place with no important position empty. Their 1-3Cs, top 4 D and goaltending all locked up. They also have top wingers under contract.
They can’t bring back the exact same team, but they can keep the foundation together. That likely means it’s more important to keep Malinski at the lowest cap hit rather than getting him signed medium to long term at a bigger hit.
Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,267
- 31,422
Malinski's negotiations will be very interesting to follow.
He didn't produce much for the bulk of the season, and was just playing ok for the most part, with some good and not so good contributions.
Then after the deadline he seems to have had a confidence boost, probably after not being traded, and now he's playing very well. Fairly solid defensively, though still has issues getting hit hard with the puck below his own goal line, and he's scoring more, which the Avs really needed from the blueline IMO.
But we haven't seen him in the playoffs yet. That will also have a big impact on his next contract.
So all of that makes his negotiations interesting, but he also turns 27 in the off season. These are the years for him to maximize his earning potential.
I'd say QO him if you need to save money, but if he plays ok in the playoffs, try to get a bargain 2-3 year deal instead, since he hasn't had much time to prove himself and command a big deal.
Problem is, does he want to sign a bargain 2-3 year deal at 27 years old? Probably not. He might just want the QO so he can go to UFA anyway.
The Avs options are very limited on the blueline. Almost no future assets to trade, not much money to spend on UFA's, and they haven't had many draft picks lately, and don't pick that well outside the first round anyway. Behrens and Gulyayev are mystery boxes.
If Malinski plays well in the playoffs, the Avs should probably find a way to keep him a bit longer IMO. Unless they have another plan for a big name two way D.
Richard88
John 3:16
- Jun 29, 2019
- 19,390
- 21,345
I wonder if there's an offer sheet risk with Malinski.
The Avs probably can't afford to go higher than $1.5m-$2m, but if he continues his current good play into the playoffs he might look to cash in this offseason, and with RHD's being in high demand a team might think that it's worth giving up a 2nd round pick to offer him a contract in the $2,290,458+ range. Even a $2,290,457 AAV offer sheet would potentially be awkward for the Avs to match and it would only cost a 3rd round pick.
Granted offer sheets are pretty rare, but we already saw St Louis do it twice last year with Holloway and Broberg in that price range so it isn't out of the realm of possibility that it happens with Malinski.
dahrougem2
Registered User
Malinski to me is not worth more than 1.5M
Doesn't PK, doesn't PP, doesn't produce much offensively.
If a team offersheets him, you take whatever it is 2nd or 3rd and walk away.
They'll have turned a free NCAA UFA into a couple years of play and a draft pick. A win
Doesn't PK, doesn't PP, doesn't produce much offensively.
If a team offersheets him, you take whatever it is 2nd or 3rd and walk away.
They'll have turned a free NCAA UFA into a couple years of play and a draft pick. A win
Richard88
John 3:16
- Jun 29, 2019
- 19,390
- 21,345
That's a fine take, but the issue then is that the Avs would need to find a replacement for Malinski at the same time that they need to find a replacement for Manson, and with the RHD market being really sparse. Finding a 3RHD for <$1.5m would be tricky.
Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,267
- 31,422
I don't necessarily disagree, but the problem is they're going to have a hard time finding D men, and they already have a serviceable one in Malsinski at least.
Turning a UFA into an asset is good, but aside from using it in a trade, it's only as good as the player they pick, which tends to be not so good for the Avs outside the first round.
dahrougem2
Registered User
Would have no impact.
Cap is projected to rise like $9M the year Necas is a UFA I believe. His raise shouldn't even be half of that quite frankly.
BobRossColton
Registered User
I really hope Malinski doesn't price himself out of here.
Anders Cain
Registered User
Anders Cain
Registered User
Anders Cain
Registered User
Chiarelli
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2019
- 4,167
- 5,679
Malinski has to be at the right price he really hasn’t shown that much
Well that's bullshit
- Apr 25, 2006
- 48,484
- 50,693
To everyone who’s been saying for months that the team would be better off with Rantanen instead of good depth: where are you hiding now? 
