WJC: 2025 Team Canada Roster Talk

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,611
11,869
Murica


This is kind of wild. Maybe I just don't remember it happening but I can't think of many examples of NHL GMs openly questioning HC.

It's his guy, so not really surprising. It looks like Canada is going somewhat "low event" with some of its player selections, especially on defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dack

Dack

Registered User
Jun 16, 2014
3,964
3,653
It's his guy, so not really surprising. It looks like Canada is going somewhat "low event" with some of its player selections, especially on defense.
Yeah I'm not surprised that he's disappointed. Execs are just usually more diplomatic about it in my experience.

Something like "we're disappointed Carter wasn't selected for the team but we're very happy with his play so far this season"

Rather than kind of openly questioning his omission.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,349
14,703
Even though Yakemchuk should be at the camp, Staios looks like a fan rather than a general manager in his quote. He changes nothing by publicly complaining rather than making himself look somewhat less professional. Losing leads to changes.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,331
16,525
Look at the forwards on this team. This is not a team that is going to have a free-wheeling dman doing laps in the ozone. They want each line to have an identity. On defense, they want a first pair, a second pair, and a third pair, not 3 first pairs. They want the bottom-6 to play like a bottom-6. If Parekh isn't going to be PP1, and playing 18minutes+ a night, he has no place on the team.
That does make much sense…

If you were picking an NHL all star team, would you omit say Adam Fox for Brandon Carlo because Fox wouldn’t be on PP1 or be playing top pair minutes?

You take the best damn players. Not guys who are “used” to playing less minutes.
 

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,570
4,782
That does make much sense…

If you were picking an NHL all star team, would you omit say Adam Fox for Brandon Carlo because Fox wouldn’t be on PP1 or be playing top pair minutes?

You take the best damn players. Not guys who are “used” to playing less minutes.
Again, you wouldn't make Jake Evans the 4th line C of Canada's Olympic team
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan

macbowes

Registered User
Aug 1, 2022
572
904
Victoria
That does make much sense…

If you were picking an NHL all star team, would you omit say Adam Fox for Brandon Carlo because Fox wouldn’t be on PP1 or be playing top pair minutes?

You take the best damn players. Not guys who are “used” to playing less minutes.
You're not making an all-star team. There are guys who are not elite offensively that are elite defensively that are better at playing a defensive role than guys who play top minutes on their NHL teams. Older players tend to have better defensive habits than younger players. It's not like the players left off were going to be playing in the top-6, or the top-4 of this team. The players left off are not much better offensively than the players on the team, and they aren't better defensively.
 

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
43,064
9,252


Instead of playing CIS teams in training camp every year fans should get to vote on an rejects team and that's who the camp roster has to play. If the rejects team wins the Canada coach is fired and replaced by the rejects coach who then has to include at least 6 players from the rejects roster on his final team. Both sides have something to play for.

If you think your roster constructed with role players is capable of beating what you deem inferior teams then prove it. If it's not then I'd love to find out now and correct it instead of finding out January 2nd when there's nothing left to be done but go home
 
Last edited:

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,644
33,930
Dartmouth,NS
Instead of playing CIS teams in training camp every year fans should get to vote on an rejects team and that's who the camp roster has to play. If the rejects team wins the Canada coach is fired and replaced by the rejects coach who then has to include at least 6 players from the rejects roster on his final team. Both sides have something to play for.

If you think your roster constructed with role players is capable of beating what you deem inferior teams then prove it. If it's not then I'd love to find out now and correct it instead of finding out January 2nd when there's nothing left to be done but go home
I mean that would basically just be running the old school 40 man camp with more steps no? Like at that point you just invite them all to camp. Otherwise your idea makes literally no sense and doesn't actually prepare any of the players for the tournament like playing the U Sport teams would.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,331
16,525
You're not making an all-star team. There are guys who are not elite offensively that are elite defensively that are better at playing a defensive role than guys who play top minutes on their NHL teams. Older players tend to have better defensive habits than younger players. It's not like the players left off were going to be playing in the top-6, or the top-4 of this team. The players left off are not much better offensively than the players on the team, and they aren't better defensively.
Parekh and Yakemchuck aren’t much better offensively than Gibson or Cam Allen?

Misa or Iginla aren’t better offensively than Ethan Gauthier or Tanner Howe?
 

macbowes

Registered User
Aug 1, 2022
572
904
Victoria
Parekh and Yakemchuck aren’t much better offensively than Gibson or Cam Allen?

Misa or Iginla aren’t better offensively than Ethan Gauthier or Tanner Howe?
None of Gauthier, Howe, or Allen are a sure thing to make the team. Sure, Parekh, and Yakemchuk are better offensively than Gibson, but he's better defensively than both of them, and he's going to be the defensive half of his pairing. Dickinson, and Schaefer can run a PP nearly as effectively as either Yakemchuk, or Parekh, but they're both better defensively. Between Dickinson, Schaefer, and Moledyk, they don't really need more offense from the back end. They're going to have a dman who can transition the puck on every pairing. Misa is an 07, and they probably had a policy of not bringing more than 1 2007 player at each position. Generally this is what they do, so they have players who can act as mentors the following year. Iginla doesn't bring much more offense than anyone who will make the team, and he's a 2006. When you're making these teams, it's critical to appreciate that each birth year gets their turn as the main year. 2025 = 2005, 2026 = 2006, etc. Of the 31 players invited to camp, only 10 are not born in 2005. Anytime there is a close call between two players, they are going to take the older player.
 
  • Love
Reactions: ORRFForever

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,755
1,934
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
None of Gauthier, Howe, or Allen are a sure thing to make the team. Sure, Parekh, and Yakemchuk are better offensively than Gibson, but he's better defensively than both of them, and he's going to be the defensive half of his pairing. Dickinson, and Schaefer can run a PP nearly as effectively as either Yakemchuk, or Parekh, but they're both better defensively. Between Dickinson, Schaefer, and Moledyk, they don't really need more offense from the back end. They're going to have a dman who can transition the puck on every pairing. Misa is an 07, and they probably had a policy of not bringing more than 1 2007 player at each position. Generally this is what they do, so they have players who can act as mentors the following year. Iginla doesn't bring much more offense than anyone who will make the team, and he's a 2006. When you're making these teams, it's critical to appreciate that each birth year gets their turn as the main year. 2025 = 2005, 2026 = 2006, etc. Of the 31 players invited to camp, only 10 are not born in 2005. Anytime there is a close call between two players, they are going to take the older player.
I agree with you on the defensemen, if Gibson and Brunicke are the two RHD behind Bonk, then I have no issue with that, there are already so many offensively gifted defenseman. I would like to avoid Allen who has been bad at international events, but we shall see. Even last year the issue wasn’t really the amount of stay at home defensemen they took, save for a few bad gaps and defending wall in sequences from Warren in the quarterfinal, they still managed to give up to only 10 goals through 5 games, which is enough to win.


The real issue for me is the forward selection. The top 6 will still be really good, but the three non-selections of Misa (especially), Sennecke and Greentree in favour of players who I don’t think bring anything of value like Pinelli, Howe, and the DEI quota inclusion Gauthier is a real head scratcher. Having one physical identity player à la Beaudoin is fine, but 3 is ridiculous, especially if you’re leaving off the top goal scorer in the entire country
 

PanniniClaus

Registered User
Oct 12, 2006
11,218
4,939
I agree with you on the defensemen, if Gibson and Brunicke are the two RHD behind Bonk, then I have no issue with that, there are already so many offensively gifted defenseman. I would like to avoid Allen who has been bad at international events, but we shall see. Even last year the issue wasn’t really the amount of stay at home defensemen they took, save for a few bad gaps and defending wall in sequences from Warren in the quarterfinal, they still managed to give up to only 10 goals through 5 games, which is enough to win.


The real issue for me is the forward selection. The top 6 will still be really good, but the three non-selections of Misa (especially), Sennecke and Greentree in favour of players who I don’t think bring anything of value like Pinelli, Howe, and the DEI quota inclusion Gauthier is a real head scratcher. Having one physical identity player à la Beaudoin is fine, but 3 is ridiculous, especially if you’re leaving off the top goal scorer in the entire country
I agree. We brought plumbers to Halifax and got bailed out by Bedard's brilliance. Brought plumbers last year and got what was coming. Pile some more plumbers into this team on home ice and I don't see Bedard to bail us out. Take the best talent and you will never be questioned.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad