I don't blame him - who would want to commit extra time to that place.
Agreed, but best be careful he doesn’t f up an offer of whatever hundred k per week.
I don't blame him - who would want to commit extra time to that place.
Better than random Man U blogs though?ESPN is a legit source now. They have gotten WAY better compared to five years ago. I still wouldn't take them over the likes of Sky Sports, Fabrizio Romano, The Times, and The Telegraph, but they're better than the likes of random sport journalists from Spain, Italy, or South America.
There are plenty of better sources in Spain, Italy, and South America. Especially when it comes to their own players and teams lol.ESPN is a legit source now. They have gotten WAY better compared to five years ago. I still wouldn't take them over the likes of Sky Sports, Fabrizio Romano, The Times, and The Telegraph, but they're better than the likes of random sport journalists from Spain, Italy, or South America.
Not for that either. I’d be shocked if LFC offered more than Cherki. Maybe someone else would, but do not think it’ll be LFCNah I think it'll come down to 60.
Tom Bischof to Bayern from Hoffenheim on a free to provide some competition in midfield. Why is he leaving on a free though at 19 though? @cgf
Arthur Veermeeren's loan from Atletico to Leipzig made permanent for 20 mil.
Amoura's loan from Union SG to Wolfsburg made permanent for 15 mil. Quite a bargain.
Felix Udoukhai's loan from Augsburg to Besiktas made permanent for 5 mil
Those reports are very credible though. Good source.Not for that either. I’d be shocked if LFC offered more than Cherki. Maybe someone else would, but do not think it’ll be LFC
It may be, but I cannot see LFC saying "lets pay more for a guy who isn't as good as the other guy we wanted from the same team"Those reports are very credible though. Good source.
Except they are signing Wirtz. Fofana is a LW.It may be, but I cannot see LFC saying "lets pay more for a guy who isn't as good as the other guy we wanted from the same team"
Right, but not to LFC. They aren’t going to see value in thatExcept they are signing Wirtz. Fofana is a LW.
Cherki's price is only due to his own deal with Lyon. Fofana will go much more no doubt.
I think if they sell Diaz for 80 and buy Fofana for 60 they'd be happy. Fofana is 21 or something.Right, but not to LFC. They aren’t going to see value in that
If they sell Diaz for 80, they are going to have better options than Fofana in a similar price bracketI think if they sell Diaz for 80 and buy Fofana for 60 they'd be happy. Fofana is 21 or something.
Which?If they sell Diaz for 80, they are going to have better options than Fofana in a similar price bracket
Just using transfermrkt values here - not perfect but easiest.Which?
As for PSG transfer window, not many options to upgrade.
They need a quality RB backup. A right footed CB.
A midfielder (4 quality options for 3 spots).
Selling Kang In Lee and bringing another offensive option (Akliouche?).
Donna might leave (contract ends in 26). Either he resigns or PSG will hunt, probably for Chevalier.
Ramos might leave. If so PSG has to buy a 9.
Kolo will leave.
Yes, they are considered a source, though not necessarily the highest rated. High enough to be rated though.ESPN is a legit source now. They have gotten WAY better compared to five years ago. I still wouldn't take them over the likes of Sky Sports, Fabrizio Romano, The Times, and The Telegraph, but they're better than the likes of random sport journalists from Spain, Italy, or South America.
You do understand how these tweets by numerous aggregators work though? They add the original source at the end in parenthesis.Better than random Man U blogs though?
I was sleeping.Cunha confirmed for United and Jussi haven’t posted yet? What’s wrong with the world.
You’ve got to keep an eye on who the writer is though. That is what makes the difference.Yes, they are considered a source, though not necessarily the highest rated. High enough to be rated though.
They don’t though. It’s lucky if they are aggregating a secondary source, let alone a primary source.You do understand how these tweets by numerous aggregators work though? They add the original source at the end in parenthesis.