2025 Summer Transfer Rumors and Discussion Closed Window | Page 52 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2025 Summer Transfer Rumors and Discussion Closed Window

LOL, I’m calm. I don’t support Sporting or United. Point is that United don’t have European football next season and with the potential list of suitors Gyokeres is rumored to have they wouldn’t interest him. In fact, it’s been rumored to be the case. Additionally, he’d be an upgrade on Hojlund and Zirkzee. As for his price tag, Sporting are asking a lot for someone who is only so proven. That said, I can’t see his last two seasons, especially this past season, as nothing but impressive. How that translates to the Premiership one can only speculate and there are multiple factors to consider, but I think if he plays with halfway competent teammates he brings at the very least a decent goal return.

Apparently Sporting doesn't want to go lower than EUR 80 m (GBP 67 m). It would almost be funny if another window went by with no one picking him up. (If it meant Arsenal went another window without getting a striker though, it would be a lot less funny.)
 
I don't think so. Frankfurt are hard negotiator but they are not stupid either. If their player wants out and they got a huge profit and can find a cheaper alternative they will do the move. As for LFC, it's Michael Edwards, I doubt he will go beyond his own evaluation of the player to get this through.
look what they got for Marmoush, look what the got for Kolo Muani. That’s just recent strikers. Frankfurt is not doing anyone a favor. Ekitike is under contract and Frankfurt have UCL
 
Basically all of Brighton's top 10 sales have basically turned out to be fair value.

Caicedo - 116m - worth it
Cucurella - 65m - worth it
White - 58m - was worth it, even though he seems to have fallen out of favour?
Mac Allister - 42m - worth it
Bissouma - 29m - worth it
Undav - 28m - worth it
Trossard - 24m - worth it
Sanchez - 23m - welllllllllll
Burn - 15m - worth it
Gilmour - 14m - worth it

They play hardball sometimes, but there aren't really any in their sale portfolio that I'd be like "wow they really took the buyer to the cleaners."

Now, mind you, they've sometimes played too much hardball and deprived themselves of a good sale (see: Ferguson, Evan).
 
look what they got for Marmoush, look what the got for Kolo Muani. That’s just recent strikers. Frankfurt is not doing anyone a favor. Ekitike is under contract and Frankfurt have UCL
As I have said, this is Michael Edwards if the valuation is not matching the player he will move on to another player. Wirtz is a different beast than Ekitike.

Kolo Muani is the exact example on that. PSG should have offered 60M max and play hard ball with them, Muani was clearly frustrated by the asking price set by Frankfurt, PSG flinched and they overpaid for him and now it is looking very bad with hindsight. Marmoush at 85M was not an insane high price considering his output in the league. Ekitike is so far more potential than a guaranteed, clearly not worth 100M.
 
As I have said, this is Michael Edwards if the valuation is not matching the player he will move on to another player. Wirtz is a different beast than Ekitike.

Kolo Muani is the exact example on that. PSG should have offered 60M max and play hard ball with them, Muani was clearly frustrated by the asking price set by Frankfurt, PSG flinched and they overpaid for him and now it is looking very bad with hindsight. Marmoush at 85M was not an insane high price considering his output in the league. Ekitike is so far more potential than a guaranteed, clearly not worth 100M.
PSG tried to hold on a lower price for Kolo Muani. They didn't get serious, to Frankfurt's perspective, until too late in the window for Frankfurt to replace him, which caused the final price to escalate as much as it did.

I think they are clearly expecting to sell him this window, but he's under contract til '29 and they also have Champions League, so can probably make sure they get their desired price.
 
I think 100% of Chelsea fans would tell you that there are zero regrets over the Caicedo transfer. He was the best midfielder in the Premier League this season.

The market is f***ed, but Caicedo is so profoundly far from being a case of "smart-selling club gouges big club on mediocre player."
I mean im sure you lot have no regrets over the transfer (funds are largely meaningless to Chelsea ) He's a great player and all that but he's hardly worth over 100M. He isnt a unicorn and he isnt really doing anything that a player who went for half that isnt doing.

Theres a big discrepancy between being worth 116M to what is being described here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maclean
PSG tried to hold on a lower price for Kolo Muani. They didn't get serious, to Frankfurt's perspective, until too late in the window for Frankfurt to replace him, which caused the final price to escalate as much as it did.

I think they are clearly expecting to sell him this window, but he's under contract til '29 and they also have Champions League, so can probably make sure they get their desired price.
Which is also why I do not believe that 100M price tag. LFC will not go that high when a guy like Gyokeres is there at 70M or Osimhen probably at even lower cost. It's negotiaton tactics. I also do not believe the Sesko price tag either.

I get it Frankfurt have zero need to sell and they have every rights to ask for the moon but they are also a logical bunch in Germany, they know they could find an alternative at 1/3 of the value of Ekitike. They also know that having a disgruntled player is never good and it might not be a good look for other players within that team that could look to also get opportunities elsewhere. We will see I guess but I would be shocked if LFC submit that much for him especially after the Nunez experiment.
 
Surprised to see all the Cunha hate. What's the main reason for it? There's always a chance that players will fail anywhere when they move. With Cunha he is very talented and is EPL-proven. But yes, still laugh at Mandisaster after spending loads on Hojlund and Zirkzee and still need to go out to replace them lol.


Chelsea is going to Chelsea. But Delap reminded me a bit of a young Jamie Vardy at times this season.
For what it's worth, I don't hate Cunha and I could see him being successful in the Amorim system. I just have him behind other guys.
 
id take him over like Sesko and Gyokeres for sure but as his price tag gets closer to 100m, the less that it makes sense.
This is a "helps me sleep at night" level of post only because KFC is rumoured to be after Ekitike lol. I've seen too many players fail coming from great BuLi years to the EPL to think that Ekitike is a better or safer option than Sesko or Gyokeres. What worries me about Hugo is that this is like his third team in four years or something, and Sesko had similar stats being in a much worse situation. You'd be wrong to spend anything close to 100 million on Ekitike and you'd be wrong to take him over Gyokeres or Sesko.
 
This is a "helps me sleep at night" level of post only because KFC is rumoured to be after Ekitike lol.
No. I think Ekitike has a higher ceiling because he has better feet. He runs better. Passes better, dribbles better. Think he’s a decent presser. Think his finishing is erratic which is a red flag for me, but Sesko also erratic and Gyokeres isn’t really a style fit so I stand by it
I've seen too many players fail coming from great BuLi years to the EPL to think that Ekitike is a better or safer option than Sesko or Gyokeres.
Sesko would also be coming from BuLi though wouldn’t he? Gyokeres coming from Portuguese league which is worse. And he’s about to be 27. Which for some teams is fine, but we usually aren’t signing players that age.
What worries me about Hugo is that this is like his third team in four years or something, and Sesko had similar stats being in a much worse situation.
LFC kind of like the profile of the guys that went big club for big money too soon, had to take a step back and rebuild themselves. So I don’t think that’s a deterrent to them.

Sesko is one of those guys that either drops a highlight or does nothing. Did not stand out for a lousy RBL team/was not one of their two best forwards even. Don’t like his passing. Think touch is erratic.

People like him because he is tall and he can do fancy stuff but he’s not the guy I would be the house on.
You'd be wrong to spend anything close to 100 million on Ekitike and you'd be wrong to take him over Gyokeres or Sesko.
I wouldn’t spend 100m on any of the three
 
  • Like
Reactions: luiginb and S E P H
White - 58m - was worth it, even though he seems to have fallen out of favour?
He was just injured all season. He and Timber will split time at RB, I think, depending on what is needed. Timber is better defensively so will play against teams where that's needed while White is so much better at unlocking low blocks and creating the dynamic right side triangle with Saka and Odegaard.
I think 100% of Chelsea fans would tell you that there are zero regrets over the Caicedo transfer. He was the best midfielder in the Premier League this season.

The market is f***ed, but Caicedo is so profoundly far from being a case of "smart-selling club gouges big club on mediocre player."
Not sure I agree with the bolded BUT I do think Caicedo having a good season this season is also why Enzo looked good this year. I'm not sure if that's necessarily worth 116M because in theory one 100M midfielder shouldn't need another 100M next to him to look good, but also money is irrelevant to Chelsea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maclean and KJS14
Apparently Sporting doesn't want to go lower than EUR 80 m (GBP 67 m). It would almost be funny if another window went by with no one picking him up. (If it meant Arsenal went another window without getting a striker though, it would be a lot less funny.)
All the strikers available all have issues and worries that they will bust. There isn't a proven Haaland out there this window if you'd ask me. Osimhen is easily the best, but I feel a ton of clubs (aka Arsenal) are steering clear because he would be immensely expensive. If Chelsea couldn't get the deal done last year, hard to think we would be in the same conversation. Sesko has awesome potential, but all it is is potential and he has a similar game to Havertz. Ekitike is way too hard to gauge atm to be a considerable target for his price range. Gyokeres failed in the EPL before, a big risk that he could bust again in the EPL's style of football.

Even with all the negative posts I made in the EPL gameday threads about lacking a #9, I wouldn't be too distraught if we walked away with nothing again. As long as Nico Williams was brought in to replace the huge issues we have on the left side. A front three of Williams - Havertz - Saka would and could win an EPL title IMHO, but hard to say if they could win a CL title compared to Williams - Gyokeres/Sesko - Saka.
 
Sesko would also be coming from BuLi though wouldn’t he? Gyokeres coming from Portuguese league which is worse. And he’s about to be 27. Which for some teams is fine, but we usually aren’t signing players that age.
I answered that sentence below this one. Ekitike had a great season, while Sesko had a bad season, yet both posted similar stats. Never buy high on a player, or you'll get Pepes'. I suggest that dribbling can get you only so far and I def wouldn't take a striker who has poor finishing skills as a striker. This sounds like a Nunez 2.0 level of player for me. Because of that, I'd comfortably say that Sesko is better, and Sesko isn't going for 100 million. All the rumours I keep seeing are that he'd be available for around 50 million pounds (I believe it was Sterling and not Euros). That is not a bad value.
People like him because he is tall and he can do fancy stuff but he’s not the guy I would be the house on.
I am not too much into him because he seems like another Havertz type of profile, while Gyokeres would be actually different. Nonetheless, from the matches I saw of Sesko (which I admit are not a ton), he has always looked decent. I also do agree with you, though that he does a bunch of nothing when he's not performing good, which is very Havertz-esque.
 
If they don’t get Ekitike I think they just sign another winger or attacking midfielder. I don’t think we are going to compromise on a lousy striker market
I think they really like a striker that can interchange with a winger from time to time and that can drop deep and create for other. That's why they used Diaz as a striker instead of Nunez.
 
I answered that sentence below this one. Ekitike had a great season, while Sesko had a bad season, yet both posted similar stats. Never buy high on a player, or you'll get Pepes'.
You get Pepe when you pay for a player whose goals were artificially inflated by being switched onto PKs.
I suggest that dribbling can get you only so far and I def wouldn't take a striker who has poor finishing skills as a striker. This sounds like a Nunez 2.0 level of player for me. Because of that, I'd comfortably say that Sesko is better, and Sesko isn't going for 100 million.
Neither are amazing finishers. Both are erratic. Ekitike does more stuff than Sesko does though. I don’t think there’s a ton of evidence that suggests Sesko is “better” (or that he is worse) but Ekitike was his teams best forwards for half the season, and his team made UCL with him playing and important role. Sesko can’t say any of that
All the rumours I keep seeing are that he'd be available for around 50 million pounds (I believe it was Sterling and not Euros). That is not a bad value considering that Ekitike would be going around 80+ million.
Frankfurt doesn’t have to sell. Leipzig probably does. That’s why there is a delta in the transfer fees
I am not too much into him because he seems like another Havertz type of profile, while Gyokeres would be actually different. Nonetheless, from the matches I saw of Sesko (which I admit are not a ton), he has always looked decent. I also do agree with you, though that he does a bunch of nothing when he's not performing good, which is very Havertz-esque.
I’d rather sign Havertz than any of the other three
 
I think they really like a striker that can interchange with a winger from time to time and that can drop deep and create for other. That's why they used Diaz as a striker instead of Nunez.
I don’t think we know what they like, but I think LFC are probably going to be say “hey we just won the league without a striker and we are (hopefully) adding Wirtz - let’s try and get a striker next summer”. Honestly I don’t think any of the acknowledged available strikers are undoubtedly raising the ceiling on this team. Maybe this develops differently later in the window. Maybe we make some sales and the calculus changes, but as of today if they can get their top three in - I’m cool sitting back seeing what the outgoings look like and re-assessing
 
I don’t think we know what they like, but I think LFC are probably going to be say “hey we just won the league without a striker and we are (hopefully) adding Wirtz - let’s try and get a striker next summer”. Honestly I don’t think any of the acknowledged available strikers are undoubtedly raising the ceiling on this team. Maybe this develops differently later in the window. Maybe we make some sales and the calculus changes, but as of today if they can get their top three in - I’m cool sitting back seeing what the outgoings look like and re-assessing
No way they just do that after investing so much for next season team. They will 100% get a striker in, loan with option to buy is what could be on the table for LFC if they don't get their prefered choice.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad