GDT: 2025 Playoffs - First Round

Biggest loser here is Dallas. You go from having home ice vs the 8 seed to having to face Winnipeg

In general, I'm effin' finished with the NHL's divisional playoff system crap.

There really isn't any reason to have a system in place where two of a conference's top 3 teams face each other right off the bat in the first round.

Not when you can easily do it like the majority of European leagues, where (after a pre-playoff series featuring 7 vs 10 and 8 vs 9) a logical system then sees 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, and 4 vs 5.

And it works so doggone well, it hurts.

Wasn't it like that in the NHL for a while too?

What was their argument against that? To create more local rivalry pairings á la FLA vs TBL?
 
I seriously doubt that a single person in the NHL would take Stankoven over Necas.

Not a one.
Well, good for them. Necas is a nice player, not a difference maker, he’s making 6.5 and soon gonna be 8/9M, which is elite player territory - he’s not there. You’ve already embarrassed yourself with the deal, you take a Stankhoven (that has delivered in the playoffs for Dallas in a sheltered role) and use the delta to get another playoff gamer on your roster.

For a team struggling to get out of the first round, they don’t need another ‘nice’ player. Even worse COL wanted Necas as McFarland has turned a SC team into a younger version of the Penguins in 3 seasons.

I mentioned COL was a one and done Cup winner because of McFarland taking over and letting go of Kadri - a playoff gamer and they were in the last season of a honeymoon cap situation. He’s a created a mess of that team and cap situation.
 
In general, I'm effin' finished with the NHL's divisional playoff system crap.

There really isn't any reason to have a system in place where two of a conference's top 3 teams face each other right off the bat in the first round.

Not when you can easily do it like the majority of European leagues, where (after a pre-playoff series featuring 7 vs 10 and 8 vs 9) a logical system then sees 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, and 4 vs 5.

And it works so doggone well, it hurts.

Wasn't it like that in the NHL for a while too?

What was their argument against that? To create more local rivalry pairings á la FLA vs TBL?
I thought the reason for this was to keep travel costs down. I would prefer the league go back to 1-16, 2-15 playoff matchups.
 
I thought the reason for this was to keep travel costs down. I would prefer the league go back to 1-16, 2-15 playoff matchups.

I recall that being a part of it. Shorter travel for most of the series and the increase in rivalry games.

From a competitive standpoint it should be 1-8 or 1-16, travel be damned. They won't ever go to 1-16 though because of the travel restrictions on games due to the contracts + the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJF
I recall that being a part of it. Shorter travel for most of the series and the increase in rivalry games.

From a competitive standpoint it should be 1-8 or 1-16, travel be damned. They won't ever go to 1-16 though because of the travel restrictions on games due to the contracts + the cost.
And arena availability.

My guess is you go with the older formats and people start asking for rivalries again.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad