TLEH
Pronounced T-Lay
The coach just needs to focus on playing modern hockey and implement systems around that. We don't need to play a certain way to win games or not lose games. We need to play to their philosophy and the results should come.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerBuffalo had Don. Not Tony
The coach just needs to focus on playing modern hockey and implement systems around that. We don't need to play a certain way to win games or not lose games. We need to play to their philosophy and the results should come.
GrossIf he loses his job, my vote is for Rick Tocchet.
only reason I would step up to bat for Carle is that his track record has lot more than what Colliton, LuRich and Derek King had as coaches.Absolutely no on Torts.
Sullivan and Tocchet are good names if they are canned from their current jobs. I'd also be cool with Gallant.
Carle would be interesting, he's apparently the next big thing coaching wise, but not sure I want yet another coach new to the NHL.
I didn't really see a thread but maybe there was one. Who is your pick & why? I'll start with Torts.
Tortorella has chastised players in the middle of the dressing room or even on the bench during games, and there were times the confrontations were uncomfortable. They left the rink angry with him on occasion, and they often disagreed with his coaching decisions and/or his approach. But they also were emphatic: They never witnessed Tortorella crossing the line to being verbally or physically abusive. But he will go through a "brick wall" for them.
Is he the guy to take this ship & turn it around, possibly?
Id hire him in a heartbeat!The potential uproar would probably be too much for ownership to do it, but from a purely hockey standpoint, Q would probably be a really good coach for this team.
The potential uproar would probably be too much for ownership to do it, but from a purely hockey standpoint, Q would probably be a really good coach for this team.
Watched Shaw and then Defence partner Bruce Cassidy (Hawks 1st rder ) quite a bit . What a dynamic duo they were.hell no to Torts
funny enough, interim coach Brad Shaw would be a good candidate for the Hawks
This is going to be a frustrating coaching search. Needs to have NHL experience but not a dinosaur. Needs to have fire and a bit of asshole in him but players want to play for him. Needs a modern system but preach discipline.
Looking for a unicorn that I don’t think exists this offseason.
Someone would have to stop him from falling in love with bad vets and playing them over longer term assets.Not a fan of even joking about bringing Q back.
And I generally love jokes.
Agreed. To me Q has the same issue that Torts has and that is they would both bench youngsters and lean heavily on the vets. The Hawks don't need that kind of coach.Not a fan of even joking about bringing Q back.
And I generally love jokes.
If they were 2-3yrs down the road, I would think about bringing Q back. I agree that he isn't the right coach right now.Agreed. To me Q has the same issue that Torts has and that is they would both bench youngsters and lean heavily on the vets. The Hawks don't need that kind of coach.