'sBehm with Calgary pick? Size, putting up good numbers
I have him as a DND until AT LEAST the middle-rounds personally.
I get that Behm has some size, some jam, some nice tools overall, but there are more interesting prospects available in the first couple rounds of the draft in my opinion.
And the reason for that low ranking despite some otherwise positive attributes is that Behm's skating is quite frankly extremely rough out there, perhaps too much so to be "fixed" and become workable in the NHL.
To add, I also think Behm shares a flaw of McCarron's in the way he seems to lose a lot more steam than he should when his presences on the ice get longer than, say, 30/35 seconds.
So that makes me think that Behm possibly compensates for horrible technique and skating mechanics by expending more energy/effort skating than others would, same issue as McCarron's, which would explain why Behm seemingly gets tired more quickly than other players whilst skating.
And If this is indeed the case then it would mean that Behm's skating issues are even worse than is immediately outwardly apparent, which of course would severely limit his potential in the NHL.
And the other possibility would be that Behm's disproportionately sharply-dropping level of play during extended shifts might be a case of cardio/conditioning not being in a good spot at all as things currently stand, which would be another "strike" on him in addition to the skating problems but of course much less crippling as a prospect than the other option.
Then we get into the final nail of this , the proverbial "third strike" if you will, and that is the lack of "+" tools in Behm's toolbox offensively if evaluated on NHL standards.
You can never discount someone entirely as development isn't linear and you never truly know until the cards are on the table and time has passed. But let's just say that I am not particularly enthused about Behm's potential in the NHL and leave it at that.
If we end up out of the top 4 - you gotta think they'd be looking long and hard at Frondell and Desnoyers.
They have 2nd line center upside, with a left hand shot, but can also flex to the wing.
If we look at our prospect pool and what we have at the NHL level, it's immediately apparent that our #1 need is just more talent on the top-6 and on defense, as well as time/opportunity for them to develop.
But we don't need talents equally; if we look more closely, our most immediate need in the top 6 is skilled playmaking and rush-ability as the Canadiens have arguably the worst rush-offense in the NHL right now.
Thing is, we've already drafted Demidov and Hage last year, who very much fit those needs in conjunction with what we already have.
Which means we need to look at secondary needs, and that would be talented two-way defensemen and defensively-responsible/gritty top 6 guys that are versatile.
Following that logic our management will most likely be looking at Desnoyers and Frondell very closely as they fit the versatility/defense/grit/talent needs we have very well, perhaps the best ouf of any of the other prospects available if we missed-out on the top-4.
But our management would definitely be looking at other guys too, the likes of Spence, Eklund, Smith, and McQueen most likely.
If they perceive a superior talent ultimately resides in, say, Eklund, then they should go for him despite him not really fitting the "grit/defensive play" criterion.
At this point of our rebuild, I believe that only on equal talent should our management go for needs/wants.