2025 NHL DRAFT Thread

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
I see him more like Hughes. I don’t really think either guy will be a big miss. And I don’t really have a preference, I just think that’s what they would do.
You could be right and Sweeney loves his NCAA and local guys, but I think Misa will be a much better player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPV
You could be right and Sweeney loves his NCAA and local guys, but I think Misa will be a much better player.

The local player trope is so overblown. 3.5 % of Bruins picks have been from NE under Sweeney. Of course Hagens is from NY, and Sweeney has drafted players from NY far more often than players from New England. Honestly, ae big criticism someone could have is he has missed a lot of players in his backyard that he didn't take

That said Sweeney likes NCAA and European players, that is true, but it is also likely a symptom of where the Bruins tend to draft, and the fact you have a much longer "amateur" development time available with a player before they have to make a commitment to the player for a professional contract

I don't believe that means they would take Hagens over Misa or Martone, but we would see. And it is not unthinkable.

Hagens was the best player by a wide margin on the US National development team as a 17. He also put up 47 points in 26 USHL games as a 17 year old? Anyone think he might have put up 120+ points if he played junior this year? He was the leading scorer in the world Under 18 tournament in 2024 outpacing McKenna, and he was top 10 in scoring in the world Junior this year as an 18 year old. Plus being a PPG guy at BC this year.

I am not saying I would take Hagens first, just saying it certainly wouldn't necessarily be wrong
 
Last edited:
Bruins currently sitting at 8th overall
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2017.jpeg
    IMG_2017.jpeg
    163.5 KB · Views: 1
I’m expecting Bruins to jump to 2 OA after the lottery

Who do we take ?

I’ve seen Hagens a few times Kobe I’m impressed
 
Looks like the 8th draft slot today with 3 teams on either side of us in flux. I expect to be 7-9. Maybe I should make 7-10 to account for lottery luck. Either way right on the fringe between the upper tier and everyone else it seems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RiverbottomChuck
The local player trope is so overblown. 3.5 % of Bruins picks have been from NE under Sweeney. Of course Hagens is from NY, and Sweeney has drafted players from NY far more often than players from New England. Honestly, ae big criticism someone could have is he has missed a lot of players in his backyard that he didn't take

That said Sweeney likes NCAA and European players, that is true, but it is also likely a symptom of where the Bruins tend to draft, and the fact you have a much longer "amateur" development time available with a player before they have to make a commitment to the player for a professional contract

I don't believe that means they would take Hagens over Misa or Martone, but we would see. And it is not unthinkable.

Hagens was the best player by a wide margin on the US National development team as a 17. He also put up 47 points in 26 USHL games as a 17 year old? Anyone think he might have put up 120+ points if he played junior this year? He was the leading scorer in the world Under 18 tournament in 2024 outpacing McKenna, and he was top 10 in scoring in the world Junior this year as an 18 year old. Plus being a PPG guy at BC this year.

I am not saying I would take Hagens first, just saying it certainly wouldn't necessarily be wrong
I could see them taking Hagens #1 if they win the lottery. Like you said he does fit the mold of what they usually like. Granted I'm not a draft expert but looking at Martone vs Misa vs Hagens it does seem like Hagens would be more of a fit for organizational need, however, they need everywhere. Do I trust that Sweeney will make the right choice? Absolutely not. But Sweeney is going to be here for a long time unless he decides to move on, so you have to hope that he gets it right. On the surface, any of these kids would be a much needed upgrade for the system.
 
That said Sweeney likes NCAA and European players, that is true, but it is also likely a symptom of where the Bruins tend to draft, and the fact you have a much longer "amateur" development time available with a player before they have to make a commitment to the player for a professional contract

This and the development cycle- Sweeney seems to take CHL players every 2-3 years in a given position. Would require more analysis than I am willing to do but at a glance it appears that way. 2022 was a big year for CHL players. IIRC, Dom had a lengthy article about this some time back where he asserted that the Bruins are trying to time players being ready for NHL contracts in a way that they aren't forced to sign 5 or 6 all at once to ELCs. I am simplifying somehwat probably, but it's along those lines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeIsAStud
I hope they draft Bear for his name alone, though it also appears that he is a player that would fit the type of forward Sweeney likes to draft. More seriously, they could get lucky in the lottery, but are more likely to be in the bottom half of the top ten where the Bear will be roaming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dennis Bonvie
I could see them taking Hagens #1 if they win the lottery. Like you said he does fit the mold of what they usually like. Granted I'm not a draft expert but looking at Martone vs Misa vs Hagens it does seem like Hagens would be more of a fit for organizational need, however, they need everywhere. Do I trust that Sweeney will make the right choice? Absolutely not. But Sweeney is going to be here for a long time unless he decides to move on, so you have to hope that he gets it right. On the surface, any of these kids would be a much needed upgrade for the system.

Not sure if I made it clear. While they like the longer development cycle, I don't believe that would be part of the equation if they ended up with a top 2 pick this year. Clearly anyone they would take in the top 2 is expected to be in the NHL by the start of the the 2026 season at the latest and likely in camp this fall expected to make the roster
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Hook
I hope they draft Bear for his name alone, though it also appears that he is a player that would fit the type of forward Sweeney likes to draft. More seriously, they could get lucky in the lottery, but are more likely to be in the bottom half of the top ten where the Bear will be roaming.
would surprise me if they took bear, especially around 7-10. he's out for the year with an achilles issue
and from what i've seen of him, he's better on the wing. good player though.
 
If we don't get one of the top three, I've got my fingers crossed for Frondell or Bear.

McQueen seems like high bust potential to me.
Erik Karlsson had same injury I do believe .Recovery time usually between 6 to 9 months and hockey is probably one of best sports to get it say compared to NBA.Bear is not ranked in top 10 let alone where Bruins are gonna pick though..And I am not saying picking him could not be a homerun but it's another reach hoping for it.( A short reach but still players ranked better)
 
Yea, I am not touching him with that high a pick if I am Bruins.

Because of the injury, or because of the player?

It would be hard to take him over someone like O'Brien now. That said if this injury causes him to slip into the 20s, I am doing whatever I can possibly do to get up to a pick to get him there. Maybe not the 2026 pick, but basically everything else I can move, the 2 seconds, one or two of the Providence guys, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22Brad Park
Because of the injury, or because of the player?

It would be hard to take him over someone like O'Brien now. That said if this injury causes him to slip into the 20s, I am doing whatever I can possibly do to get up to a pick to get him there. Maybe not the 2026 pick, but basically everything else I can move, the 2 seconds, one or two of the Providence guys, etc.
Both for me but mostly I think better players will be there when Boston picks.( I am a sofa junkie though not a scout 😆) .I read about the recovery status for hockey players and it's excellent, but I am not taking that risk with players ranked higher when Bruins pick.I agree with you about O Brien.
 
The center breakdown seems to be like this to me so far based on lists and some reports/profiles I've read about the players.

Tier 1 Misa/Hagens really a toss up on preference but I lean towards Misa personally for the size and it seems like he is more versatile to me.

Tier 2 Frondell who could be most NHL ready of the bunch then Desnoyers who may have a higher ceiling but a lower floor as well. Both seem like top six 2 way guys if they hit their peak.

Tier 3 McQueen and possibly Bear. McQueen is very intriguing to me as a possible steal and could end up a physical force but also could end up being more middle 6. I admittedly don't know much about Bear besides a quick highlight video or two and the elite prospects profile.

Tier 4 Obrien and also possibly Bear both of which i probably should do more research on before giving an opinion but both have good qualities as well.

The B's could utilize any of them and could get a great player but it'd be extra nice if it's one that can help sooner rather then later.
 
The center breakdown seems to be like this to me so far based on lists and some reports/profiles I've read about the players.

Tier 1 Misa/Hagens really a toss up on preference but I lean towards Misa personally for the size and it seems like he is more versatile to me.

Tier 2 Frondell who could be most NHL ready of the bunch then Desnoyers who may have a higher ceiling but a lower floor as well. Both seem like top six 2 way guys if they hit their peak.

Tier 3 McQueen and possibly Bear. McQueen is very intriguing to me as a possible steal and could end up a physical force but also could end up being more middle 6. I admittedly don't know much about Bear besides a quick highlight video or two and the elite prospects profile.

Tier 4 Obrien and also possibly Bear both of which i probably should do more research on before giving an opinion but both have good qualities as well.

The B's could utilize any of them and could get a great player but it'd be extra nice if it's one that can help sooner rather then later.
i'd put o'brien in the same tier as frondell and desnoyers, personally.

also carter bear is really a winger. everett even lists him that way. i like him as a skilled winger
with energy and grit, but he's not the answer to this team's long term C issue.
 
The center breakdown seems to be like this to me so far based on lists and some reports/profiles I've read about the players.

Tier 1 Misa/Hagens really a toss up on preference but I lean towards Misa personally for the size and it seems like he is more versatile to me.

Tier 2 Frondell who could be most NHL ready of the bunch then Desnoyers who may have a higher ceiling but a lower floor as well. Both seem like top six 2 way guys if they hit their peak.

Tier 3 McQueen and possibly Bear. McQueen is very intriguing to me as a possible steal and could end up a physical force but also could end up being more middle 6. I admittedly don't know much about Bear besides a quick highlight video or two and the elite prospects profile.

Tier 4 Obrien and also possibly Bear both of which i probably should do more research on before giving an opinion but both have good qualities as well.

The B's could utilize any of them and could get a great player but it'd be extra nice if it's one that can help sooner rather then later.
I would put O'Brien with or ahead of Bear and McQueen. The one that worries me about Bear, is the injury he suffered near end of the season. McQueen like you said, he screams bust to me and we already have a big Center project in Letourneau.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RiverbottomChuck
i'd put o'brien in the same tier as frondell and desnoyers, personally.

also carter bear is really a winger. everett even lists him that way. i like him as a skilled winger
with energy and grit, but he's not the answer to this team's long term C issue.
Frondell is probably most NHL ready of the bunch but I had enough of the Swedes here personally. I agree with you about Bear and winger with Silvertips and not the answer here.Who knows what Sweenious will do though.In meantime keep hoping they fall further and make it easier come pick time.
 

Ad

Ad