Nazzz
TheChicagoPope
- Jul 20, 2022
- 110
- 315
Lol, what is that worth?For what it's worth, Google Gemini has us drafting Hagens unless Misa/Schaefer fall.
Not much beyond seeing what the alleged consensus is floating around the internet. It looked at various prospect rating's lists and the blackhawks needs.Lol, what is that worth?
Don't question your Google AI Overlord pal.I don’t think any list for picks 3-6 is really going to mean anything. You can make an argument for anyone at any pick there. Pointless lists to me.
Don't question your Google AI Overlord pal.
Honestly, it could probably do a fine job of determining offsides calls than the human refs seem to take 5-10 minutes on. The AI would have it figured out in 5-10 secondsCan it ref?
Hawks media all usually have the same info. It flows pretty quickly throughout the city.Does Charlie Roumeliotis ever have good draft info?
Watched a YouTube interview of him from yesterday where he says “I know Porter Martone and James Hagens are probably gonna get the most attention” wonder if he’s referring to fan attention or from the Blackhawks?
He called Frondell and Desnoyers “sleeper” options for fans to keep an eye on.
I think Scott Powers has good info on players that they have drafted and if/when they will sign. I think that is from developing relationships with those players and their agents.Hawks media all usually have the same info. It flows pretty quickly throughout the city.
Basically every non-Chicago based outlet has either Hagens or Martone going to the Gawks because they’re deemed the best players at that spot.
The Chicago media is basically hinting (they know) that the Hawks are leaning towards taking a bigger center at 3.
It's gonna be Desnoyers or Frondell 100% , the only question is which one
Martone is a slower winger and Hagens is too redundant for our system
I honestly hate this draft. I wouldnt be surprised if in 8 years no star forwards come out of the top 10 and the best player is drafted at like 25th or something. Really wish there was a Fantilli, Barkov level prospect here
Hagens is too redundant but a large portion of this board (and Hawks fans in general) wanted Demidov instead of Levshunov last year.
If you had told me last year that we're going to pick Levshunov over Demidov and get Hagens the following year, that'd have been a dream scenario.
I wouldn’t be upset with Hagens
I don't even know that he's all that redundant. Our forward group isn't one that can ignore a 1st overall talent just because his frame isn't 90th percentile. It's not like he plays a small game or isn't a tough battle defensively. He shades a bit toward the perimeter, but he gets into the slot plenty and finds open ice with ease.Hagens is too redundant but a large portion of this board (and Hawks fans in general) wanted Demidov instead of Levshunov last year.
If you had told me last year that we're going to pick Levshunov over Demidov and get Hagens the following year, that'd have been a dream scenario.
Calling Hagens a 1st overall talent is an exaggerationI don't even know that he's all that redundant. Our forward group isn't one that can ignore a 1st overall talent just because his frame isn't 90th percentile. It's not like he plays a small game or isn't a tough battle defensively. He shades a bit toward the perimeter, but he gets into the slot plenty and finds open ice with ease.
The guy topped a fair amount of lists this very calendar year, while hanging in second to Schaefer on the bulk of the rest above the exploding Misa on the bulk of the rest. He's as talented as anyone in this draft, skates extremely well and works hard in his own zone. Classic microscope, couch scouting has been harder on him than any other prospect in this class, but he still put up a PPG as one of the youngest kids in the NCAA while tasked with pivoting a top line.Calling Hagens a 1st overall talent is an exaggeration