Looking at Forwatd targets IF we do not get the #1 and so miss on getting Schaefer...I leave Hagensvout forca host of reasons among them lanotgerxsmurf...Not great on draws...advantagevof pkaying with Leonard and Perrauktvthat no other forwardcprospect geys..And Hiscgoal production to assists is low..
So: if we go to plan B(not getting Schaefer a certain franchise dman) then at #2 or#3 ,or #4(if we finish 2nd last but get knocked down 2 slots ) we should have a shot at one of:
Micael Misa or Porter Martone ,or Caleb Denoyers or Roger McQueen(who is injured and so a gamble on not getting up to date viewing unless he gets back into even play this season)..
Misa,Denoyers and McQueen all shoukd bec2C solutions...Martone could be a top line or 2nd line Big Power Winger solution.
Misa to date:
37 GP 35g 37a 72 pts + 29
1.94 ppg
Last 10GP 8g 9a = 1.7ppg =slightly down pace +7
Martone to date:
31GP 22g 40a 62pts +16
2.0 ppg
Last 10GP trended down to just 1.3ppg
(3g 10a +3)
Caleb Denoyers to date :
35GP 25g 33a= 58 pts +42
1.657ppg
Last 10GP: 9g 11a = 20 pts =2ppg so trending up(actually has trended up in Decenber and January from a slowr start earlier .
Note some things:
Martone seemscto be skewing mich more assists than goals scoring =not what you want in a power wi inger.. Also his + isa lit less than either Misa or the sensational Denoyers indicating theycare better bets 5x5 for 2 wayv play=they are better defebsuveky aside from scoring..
As for closing Cebters...though Misa is ranked hogher (usually #3or#4 on the majority of lots,and Denoyers is 7-19on most lists, you have to look at 2 way lkay where thatc + is far better than just +29f or Misa to date...then compare faceoff prowess.. Misa is good at 54.5% faceoff win% but Denoyers is outstanding at above 63%..
So will want to see howcrestofcsrason plays out ..but sone concerns more on Martone,I think if we cannotvget Schaefer then Pman B should prioritize that 2C target ..since it looks like Bedard is the Hawks 1C as they hope he can improve with the right linemates and improve on draws..
I do notvthink they want to go with 2 smalk centers on thevtop 2vlines..so it seensctheycarevok with Nazar as tge RW for Bedard as long as Bertuzzi orca pkayervkijevhim can do the dirty work along the biardscand at netvfrint to create some chaos so that Bedardxand Nazar can work together to create in more space.
Therexarexstull defensivecisdues with that line but ifvthey continue to click maybevthey can outscore these isdues).
So it seems we Need ax2C good 2 ways but akso a very good goal scorer andvpjaymaker who also is goidcatcdraws..
Right mowxI have Misa still aheadvofcDenouyers ..but I might recersevthatbif Denoyers keepsctrendingbupward..Ifvhe can jeeo up hisc2ppg restofvthecseason then with his greT defense and ekitecfaceoff % it woukd be hard not to takevhomcobsibderibgvtgecdetaiks. SUREMisxhas elitexsoeed..but if Denoyerscisceven better in the defensive details and with that fantastic ability to windows I think you fill in that 2C with the best alk riubdvoackage...butbibeitger case we cannotblose.. we solve the 2C position for our core..
Moore and Boisvert can compete for3C or be used on the wing..
McQueen Is the wild card..checks the size box at overv6'5and checkscthecskating box...off zhortcsMple thiscseason,skews to better goal scorer that assists guy
.but have got to see hom play this season or you are betting only on potential or padtcsrsson younger viewing reports.. NOt sure about hiscfaceoifs or what hecwoukdcdo 5x5 in+/' 2 way play...
I am less sold on Frindell as an option that high at #2#3or#4..
OF course I IF a team drafting 3rd or4th Hagens as their top target and hexwas therexat #2,I would trade down to #3or#4 if Hawks at#2 for a steep price sweetener whether that be a prospectcwe like we like and a 2nd rounder or 2 second rounders (2025 and 2026 if they have them in stock)..WE COULD drive the price for both teans drafting 3rd or 4th by playing them against each other in a bidding war to make a "splash"...so Hagens could still be a chip for us to play ..butvthey have be nuts to think he coukd be the right fit for our future corps given we
need more size I thev top 6 and the concernI have that Hagens shoukd not be considered a lock to ve more helpful to our team structure vs. what the other options bring...but ifvteams #3or#4 think he is so greater a choice for their situation...then let's make a deal.
After Schaefer at#1,I think needcand preference at forward will take over vs. Sone one fits all BPA rating that reakkyvis not that clear to my eyes anyway.
Hagebsvis not the right fit for the Hawks but still coukd bevused for greater advantage and we still get solutions at either 2C or a top six wi get with size....all withabukities that can help us .
