Shit we running the table this yearDepends who is available in the 2030 draft.
Shit we running the table this yearDepends who is available in the 2030 draft.
Misa belongs in that group too. Kind of surprising how little shine he's getting at this point for an Exceptional Status kid who has more or less lived up to the billingSharks are the only team that are clearly worse than us on paper.
We are in a tier with Flames Ducks Montreal and Blue Jackets after that.
top 6 pick IMO
I would love Hagens Frondell Martone or Mcqueen at this point. Ryabkin after that.
He was a borderline ES kid (good enough to still go 1st in OHL Priority) that they likely gave it to because he was rumored to be interested in the Chicago Steel tender -> University of Michigan path. Good prospect but I don't think quite at that level of "shine" where I think Hagens and Frondell are more deserving of hype at this point. Probably Martone too after the U-18s he just had.Misa belongs in that group too. Kind of surprising how little shine he's getting at this point for an Exceptional Status kid who has more or less lived up to the billing
I get why those guys are frontrunners for sure but I've seen him ranked by Pronman, for example, as low as 8th. He broke McDavid's points per game record for an OHL 15 year old and had a good 2nd year despite his playing time dropping on a team that loaded up to host the Memorial Cup. I'm not necessarily saying he's going to push for #1 but he certainly belongs in the early conversation for elite players in the class.He was a borderline ES kid (good enough to still go 1st in OHL Priority) that they likely gave it to because he was rumored to be interested in the Chicago Steel tender -> University of Michigan path. Good prospect but I don't think quite at that level of "shine" where I think Hagens and Frondell are more deserving of hype at this point. Probably Martone too after the U-18s he just had.
The beauty of it is there are 2 halves of the season. I will venture to say this team (if Hall and other vets stay remotely healthy) will play strong for the first 40 plus games, meaning better than expected by most. Does this group have the legs to last the entire grind? Doubtful and the likelihood is a number of the vets will be traded off at or before the deadline. We will see some competitive hockey for stretches but the 2nd half of the season is where this team will settle back in and pick in that 5-10 range imo. This team isn't as bad as some are hoping for, but KD has the power to make sure by the end of the year we do get a solid pick.The improvements made mean that we have a legitimate NHL roster now, but it’s still a bad one. They’ll pick in or around the top 5 still
I was thinking about that too, but would it look bad to sign all these UFA deals and then flip them at the deadline?The beauty of it is there are 2 halves of the season. I will venture to say this team (if Hall and other vets stay remotely healthy) will play strong for the first 40 plus games, meaning better than expected by most. Does this group have the legs to last the entire grind? Doubtful and the likelihood is a number of the vets will be traded off at or before the deadline. We will see some competitive hockey for stretches but the 2nd half of the season is where this team will settle back in and pick in that 5-10 range imo. This team isn't as bad as some are hoping for, but KD has the power to make sure by the end of the year we do get a solid pick.
No, they've done the same the last 2 years anyway. Not everyone is going to be worth anything in a trade to do one, but Maroon, Smith, or Martinez have to expect it. The guys from last offseason should too.I was thinking about that too, but would it look bad to sign all these UFA deals and then flip them at the deadline?
I would imagine any veteran who signs a 1-2 year deal here is hoping they get flipped. They know by coming here they have a chance at more ice time/opportunity to get one more run for a cup somewhere else. They get to be leaders here then if playing well enough, dealt to a contender which I am sure they all would want. This is a win/win for the team and those players. It is why these guys sign here and have the past few years imo.I was thinking about that too, but would it look bad to sign all these UFA deals and then flip them at the deadline?
Solid. I wonder how many retention slots we have left. Let me just go check Capgeek...DAMNITI would imagine any veteran who signs a 1-2 year deal here is hoping they get flipped. They know by coming here they have a chance at more ice time/opportunity to get one more run for a cup somewhere else. They get to be leaders here then if playing well enough, dealt to a contender which I am sure they all would want. This is a win/win for the team and those players. It is why these guys sign here and have the past few years imo.
I believe McCabe is the only one we're eating.Solid. I wonder how many retention slots we have left. Let me just go check Capgeek...DAMNIT
Martone is the perfect fit for SJ or CHI.Misa will definitely be a Davidson favorite. Fantastic skater.
Martone would be so perfect for bedard.
AD - how do you rate the Hawks for next year against the other likely non-P/O teams:The beauty of it is there are 2 halves of the season. I will venture to say this team (if Hall and other vets stay remotely healthy) will play strong for the first 40 plus games, meaning better than expected by most. Does this group have the legs to last the entire grind? Doubtful and the likelihood is a number of the vets will be traded off at or before the deadline. We will see some competitive hockey for stretches but the 2nd half of the season is where this team will settle back in and pick in that 5-10 range imo. This team isn't as bad as some are hoping for, but KD has the power to make sure by the end of the year we do get a solid pick.
Personally feel the Hawks on paper are better than most every team listed there except NJ and Buff. All those teams have flaws, injuries can impact them even greater...there are a few of those teams trying to crash down for tanks while we at least are trying to move forward. I just don't see this Hawks team inside the top 5 unless the goalies get hurt and we trade the vets away very early. We are going to see some really bad hockey teams this year imo.AD - how do you rate the Hawks for next year against the other likely non-P/O teams:
Hawks very likely better than: SJ
Likely equivelent to: ANA, CGY, PHI
Likely a little worse than: CLM, MON
Very likely worse than: UTA, SEA, OTT, NJ, BUF
Unless there is some bad lottery luck (or Bedard goes absolulely bat-shyte crazy), I don't see the Hawks being any better than that top 5/6.
Honestly the ideal result. Somewhere between 70-78 points and a chance at a top 5 pick.The Hawks are better but if they finished twenty points higher than they did this year they'd still be drafting in the top five.
You'd be punting on two drafts in order to do that.
I don't like the idea of denying legal adults gainful employment.Well it should to be done. At age 20 there is a difference as opposed to teenager in physical development.
It's very possible, hard to call it either way right now. Never underestimate a group of motivated veterans that have been brought in to help the youth here. Our goaltending isn't going to be a weakness either, this team is going to win more games in the first half than many believe imo...health for the Hawks is a major factor of course, we aren't deep to sustain many injuries. I am also optimistic overall so take that with a grain of salt lol. But a number of those teams listed have many issues/holes that can either put them below us or right with us. I don't think the gap will be that wide between the bottom 5-6 teams this year.Just feel like there are a couple young teams who underperformed last year that are primed progression (MON, OTT, CLM) and who are highly motivated. There are also a couple teams in SEA and UTA who made significant additions.