If he is there at our earlier 2nd rounder, we need to take a chance on him. He is a project but upside is top 15 in this draft.
The 2nd rd of draftees should "never" be chip and a chair - that's 3rd rnd.If he is there at our earlier 2nd rounder, we need to take a chance on him. He is a project but upside is top 15 in this draft.
If he is there at our earlier 2nd rounder, we need to take a chance on him. He is a project but upside is top 15 in this draft.
First round picks should never be for needs. Always BPA. By the time the player is ready for the NHL in 2-3 years, your needs might be completely different.The 2nd rd of draftees should "never" be chip and a chair - that's 3rd rnd.
1st round: should be inherently identifiable for needs. If Pro Scouts cannot produce this then they should be fired. Why? What else are they being paid for? Enough of this "so-called" you never know. Pathetic.
2nd round: these are draftees that fit the mould but have a few deficiencies in their game. Enter the development program of said club. If our dev prog can produce, then we should be able to identify which prospects will respond.
3rd round (and higher): take a chance on those players who are moulded in your club culture, hope they respond to development.
4th +: complete crap shoot.. draft huge bottom 6 all in skill. Hope for luck.
First round picks should never be for needs. Always BPA. By the time the player is ready for the NHL in 2-3 years, your needs might be completely different.
Yup this is a very good point. Same thing applied to Galchenyuk, I thought his IQ was amazing when he was with the sting. I was wrongI will say that its not so easy to identify who has the best hockey IQ, especially if they're highly skilled. As you go up levels the gap between their IQ and the IQ of other players lessens more and more.
People thought Drouin, myself included, had high hockey IQ because he was able to manipulate so much on the ice with his high skill level. I think we can all agree that Drouins hockey IQ in the NHL is average at best.
Also, you have to consider if your org has things in spades, ie; Sabres with LD’s and small sized soft skilled forwards. At some point they would need to foray into the « needs » category.BPA if it's obvious. However, it's not always obvious and teams are quit often picking in a waive of talent.
We may have that player, and he's two years into his development. Florian Zhekaj.Prokhorov definitely fits the mold of player I'd like to see on the opposite wing of Demidov in the future. A big 6'5 power forward that scores, skates well, has a very good down low game and crashes and bangs. His hands in tight are much better than I thought. Him being Russian is also just a nice bonus.
Was not on my radar at 16 but if they went this way, I wouldn't complain.
Or Hugh Jessiman. IYKYKI've been around HF for long enough to remember the whole Justin Jokinen situation. I'm very weary of those magic prospects that look amazing of a few videos against inferior, much smaller competition. I'd need to know a lot more about that Prokhorov kid before I get excited.
Mesar is nothing like Reschny though.Don’t think Reschny is a Bobrov/Gorton type of pick. Go back to their days with the Rangers, they just rarely pick skilled 5’10 guys, especially in the 1st round. Leave that to the Sabres, who keep floundering because of it.
They tried it with Mesar and look how that turned out. Either they boom or they are useless. I think Bobrov and the gang know we have a good core. Now it’s to add sure-fire players that compliment them.
Guys like Spence, Hensler, Lakovic are more their type.
Valid criticism. But there's no comparison in the skating. Huge Specimen moved like an old truck. Prokhorov's skating is on another level.Or Hugh Jessiman. IYKYK
They already have been impacted big time in Canada. So many over ambitious parents are spending a fortune on high profit based spring hockey, clinics all year around during both the hockey season and offseason. Go into any local rink that's open in the summer time during a weekday and you have hockey entrepreneurs running semi-private clinics that cost $100+ per kid per hour. So many kids who can't afford to keep up with the Joneses's leave hockey before they hit puberty. It has a major impact on Hockey Canada who loses out on so many natural athletes rather than the rich kid who plateaus at 12 years old relative to his peers thanks to his daddy's cheque book. Hockey's a late developing sport and it's a shame how many kids with potential aren't around the game anymore when the late bloomers break out.Sooner rather than later one would think draft classes will be impacted, so much kids that probably have it in their DNA would never know because they just come from families that can't afford 10-20k a year on one kid's hobby
I was around here too. The difference is we're getting legitimate reports that Prokhorov is climbing some NHL teams lists. Justin Jokinen was a US high school hockey player whose pre-draft status was simply a fabrication of HF Boards posters who stat watched but never saw the kid play a single shift.I've been around HF for long enough to remember the whole Justin Jokinen situation. I'm very weary of those magic prospects that look amazing of a few videos against inferior, much smaller competition. I'd need to know a lot more about that Prokhorov kid before I get excited.
The jury is still out on his hockey abilities, but he's definitely a top notch natural athlete.
What do rounds 1-3 look like for Habs in 2026?We have 3 third rounders and 2 forth rounders this year, I'd be fine with us taking a chance on Katzin AND Veilleux. They're both tiny but the skill is legit and we have nothing to lose.
Specializing in one particular sport at a young age is a recent thing. Before, every young kid played multiple sports into their late teens frequently.Scouts love these multi-sport athletes these days too - the latest vogue in youth athletic development.