2025 NHL Draft: Lose a ton for Porter Martone

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Dick-related puns are kinda borderline, but I think they're acceptable so long as they aren't specifically about Sam Dickinson the person.

Anything specifically discussing the genitalia of teenagers or sexual acts around teenagers (ie get hard for Bedard) is extremely gross.
Also around sports in general... Like, let's not get hard about anything hockey related. At a MINIMUM it is an ineffective state in which to play hockey, but seriously, I just never got it.
 
Yes. I shouldn't have. I erased it, and agree to be way more careful in the future.
And you shouldn't have posted this either
Please, Dickinson Pick was my father. Call me Dick Pic.
If it really honestly bothers you, I will delete my post. But can you honestly not see the difference between me posting a silly pun that had nothing to do with Dickinson as a person and you posting a thread title proposal that graphically describes a 17 year old's bits? I think there's a significant difference here.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Trow and Sandisfan
If it really honestly bothers you, I will delete my post. But can you honestly not see the difference between me posting a silly pun that had nothing to do with Dickinson as a person and you posting a thread title proposal that graphically describes a 17 year old's bits? I think there's a significant difference here.
No, we are good. You're absolutely right, there is a difference, mine was way way worse, which is why I deleted it. Apologies to everyone!
 
Back to the draft. Seems like it’s clear who the Sharks should pick at each pick. If they get 1st overall after the lottery — Schaefer. 2nd - Hagens. 3rd — Misa 4th - Martone 5th — baby Eklund.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Suffer for Schaefer.

Misa be a Shark. with a picture of Jar Jar.
I picture in Korean BBQ
DALL·E 2025-01-15 20.22.48 - A whimsical alien-like creature with large eyes and floppy ears,...webp
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan


The debate we've all been having... and the same conclusion. Nothing of real value in here.

1. Schaefer isn't the clear-cut #1, so it would be reasonable to select a forward.
2. If he is the clear-cut #1, you take him and deal with the consequences down the road.
3. Could maybe trade down but those types of trades are hard.

Not the clear statement of "Chicago will pick a forward no matter what!" that a lot of us were hoping for.


While I'm here, Steven Ellis put out a new ranking as well, which I think are pretty good. I agree with his top-6 in order, anyway.

 


The debate we've all been having... and the same conclusion. Nothing of real value in here.

1. Schaefer isn't the clear-cut #1, so it would be reasonable to select a forward.
2. If he is the clear-cut #1, you take him and deal with the consequences down the road.
3. Could maybe trade down but those types of trades are hard.

Not the clear statement of "Chicago will pick a forward no matter what!" that a lot of us were hoping for.


While I'm here, Steven Ellis put out a new ranking as well, which I think are pretty good. I agree with his top-6 in order, anyway.


Trading down in the top-3, nevermind a 1st overall pick, just reeks of regret down the road. Unless it's a staggering overpayment (at the time, at least).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cas and coooldude

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad