2025 NHL Draft: Lose a ton for Porter Martone

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,727
6,149
Statistically our most likely draft position right now, is 5th. And we're closer to Anaheim in 6th (MTL, Buff in 4th/5th) than NSH/Chicago tied for 1st. Also for the bottom 6 teams, SJ has the highest p% over the last 10 with .5, while MTL is 2nd best at .45. ANA (.35), CHI (.3), NSH (.3), and Buff (.15 :popcorn:) are mindblowingly poor.

I bet our 'with Celebrini' pace is also closer the Wings and the Jackets, though those first 10 games do count, so that's a pretty significant gap to close.

I do think the Sharks have been a bit lucky with their late game heroics- the loss of Blackwood will make an impact here. Goals differential can sometimes be another good proxy for team quality. Here, SJ (-27) is near league bottom with MTL (-31), NSH (-28), and Chicago (-21) with a few more games played. Speaking of goal differential, Sharks are on pace for an 83 goal improvement in that metric. Again, I think it'll equalize, but my hope for a -75 goal differential (and +75 improvement) looks to be on track.
Technically it's 4th :)

I'll do a mid season stats review, but quickly looking through our /60 numbers on Moneypuck, we're playing #5-10th worst on offense but we're still bottom 3 on D, and that means we are still playing as a bottom 3 team. Given we just downgraded from Blackwood to Georgiev, we could easily lose 1-3 more games than otherwise, and that could make all the difference between picking top 4 and picking top 6-7.
1734455250828.png
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
10,243
2,403
Right now, our most likely individual pick is #4 (39.8%), but we have a 30% chance to pick #1-3 just as things stand now, and I suspect we'll drop as the season goes on.

You're right, 4th, not 3rd: 2025 NHL Draft Lottery Odds | Tankathon.

I still think Nash and Buff have to be better. I wouldn't be surpised if Montreal improves a bit as well. I'd be stunned to see Chicago higher than 2nd this year unless some of their kids come up and are outstanding.

Speaking of Chicago, I'd like to see Chicago extend Bedard this year after a lesser scoring season, as that will be Celebrini's immediate contract comparable. Once Celebrini is signed, all other Sharks contracts have that as a ceiling. Sign Celebrini for $10-11M and Smith gets a $7-9.5M cap hit. As does any big UFA pursued in free agency. Granted this means we're out on Marner, Rantanen, Kaprizov, but maybe not Boeser, Ehlers, Connor, and Tuch types.

Technically it's 4th :)

I'll do a mid season stats review, but quickly looking through our /60 numbers on Moneypuck, we're playing #5-10th worst on offense but we're still bottom 3 on D, and that means we are still playing as a bottom 3 team. Given we just downgraded from Blackwood to Georgiev, we could easily lose 1-3 more games than otherwise, and that could make all the difference between picking top 4 and picking top 6-7.
View attachment 946658

Good reminder to not use the word statistically without actually checking the facts lol.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,799
15,625
Folsom
Maybe stop hoping that the Sharks will be in the top 3 of the draft) Schaefer will be on another team. We need to look at the real options - Smith, Eklund, Desnoyers
Nah, not when they're 3rd to last in points percentage. Top 3 in the draft is a real option. All it takes is another injury to Celebrini for any extended period of time and they can easily go on another massive losing streak. They've lost four of five as it is now and their next five opponents are all more or less playoff teams and a sixth that is a playoff team by points percentage.
 

vortexy

Registered User
Jun 13, 2024
223
535
You also have to think that Nashville's meltdown will course correct at some point during the year, no?
I think they remain bad but not this bad, more so in the bottom 5-7 range.

At the end of day I think the battle for the bottom 2-3 teams in the league will be be between the Hawks, Sharks, Habs, and the Ducks. Any matchups we have vs these teams pray for losses similar to when we played the Hawks last year.

Edit: Selling off Blackwood was also really key, he definitely stole a few games this season already. Also expect us to continue selling at the deadline and our lineup gets weaker, especially if we lose Granlund
 
Last edited:

vortexy

Registered User
Jun 13, 2024
223
535
Wow at practice for Team Canada for the WJC and Schaefer is the QB for PP1. If he performs on the big stage I bet he will be conseus #1 when all is said and done. Doesn’t mean he will be picked #1 depending on the team’s needs but it’s definitely steering in the direction that we will need the #1 or #2 pick to get him I bet. Also I am a little surprised to see Dickinson not on either power play unit



 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

one2gamble

Registered User
Dec 24, 2007
17,574
8,921
Wow at practice for Team Canada for the WJC and Schaefer is the QB for PP1. If he performs on the big stage I bet he will be conseus #1 when all is said and done. Doesn’t mean he will be picked #1 depending on the team’s needs but it’s definitely steering in the direction that we will need the #1 or #2 pick to get him I bet. Also I am a little surprised to see Dickinson not on either power play unit




yea unless he implodes I dont think hes coming to San Jose
 

vortexy

Registered User
Jun 13, 2024
223
535
Scouching released his rankings so far for the draft class, he goes into a lot of detail and analysis on each of the players. His top 5 is as follows, 1. Schaefer, 2. Misa, 3. Hagens, 4. Martone, 5. Eklund


 

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
5,144
5,258
Yes, but also Juuse Saros.

Genuinely can't believe that the Sabres now have a worse winning percentage than us.
Thank god Grier is laoding this team with gamers. If they didn't quit last year, we don't have to worry about a Buffalo-style collapse from this group (at least on the effort side).
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,599
25,276
Bay Area
Thank god Grier is laoding this team with gamers. If they didn't quit last year, we don't have to worry about a Buffalo-style collapse from this group (at least on the effort side).
Yup. The absolute most important thing is that this team doesn't quit. The vibes are still good. I can't even begin to figure out what I'd do if I was Buffalo's GM. Feel like the only way to solve this problem is to disperse the team. Lots of talent wasting away over there.
 

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
5,144
5,258
Yup. The absolute most important thing is that this team doesn't quit. The vibes are still good. I can't even begin to figure out what I'd do if I was Buffalo's GM. Feel like the only way to solve this problem is to disperse the team. Lots of talent wasting away over there.
Both are too young to be "part of the problem", but if they shed and rebuild I'd love to pry Kulich or Helenius away :naughty:
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,599
25,276
Bay Area
Both are too young to be "part of the problem", but if they shed and rebuild I'd love to pry Kulich or Helenius away :naughty:
Nah, I think you try and pry someone like Cozens, Quinn, or Peterka away for less than they're worth. I feel like they'd rebound if put into a better environment. Pretty much every name Buffalo has traded away has gone on to have success with other teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timorous me

Ad

Ad

Ad