- Jun 23, 2020
- 6,027
- 8,737
Right now, our most likely individual pick is #4 (39.8%), but we have a 30% chance to pick #1-3 just as things stand now, and I suspect we'll drop as the season goes on.
Technically it's 4thStatistically our most likely draft position right now, is 5th. And we're closer to Anaheim in 6th (MTL, Buff in 4th/5th) than NSH/Chicago tied for 1st. Also for the bottom 6 teams, SJ has the highest p% over the last 10 with .5, while MTL is 2nd best at .45. ANA (.35), CHI (.3), NSH (.3), and Buff (.15 ) are mindblowingly poor.
I bet our 'with Celebrini' pace is also closer the Wings and the Jackets, though those first 10 games do count, so that's a pretty significant gap to close.
I do think the Sharks have been a bit lucky with their late game heroics- the loss of Blackwood will make an impact here. Goals differential can sometimes be another good proxy for team quality. Here, SJ (-27) is near league bottom with MTL (-31), NSH (-28), and Chicago (-21) with a few more games played. Speaking of goal differential, Sharks are on pace for an 83 goal improvement in that metric. Again, I think it'll equalize, but my hope for a -75 goal differential (and +75 improvement) looks to be on track.
Right now, our most likely individual pick is #4 (39.8%), but we have a 30% chance to pick #1-3 just as things stand now, and I suspect we'll drop as the season goes on.
Technically it's 4th
I'll do a mid season stats review, but quickly looking through our /60 numbers on Moneypuck, we're playing #5-10th worst on offense but we're still bottom 3 on D, and that means we are still playing as a bottom 3 team. Given we just downgraded from Blackwood to Georgiev, we could easily lose 1-3 more games than otherwise, and that could make all the difference between picking top 4 and picking top 6-7.
View attachment 946658
Nah, not when they're 3rd to last in points percentage. Top 3 in the draft is a real option. All it takes is another injury to Celebrini for any extended period of time and they can easily go on another massive losing streak. They've lost four of five as it is now and their next five opponents are all more or less playoff teams and a sixth that is a playoff team by points percentage.Maybe stop hoping that the Sharks will be in the top 3 of the draft) Schaefer will be on another team. We need to look at the real options - Smith, Eklund, Desnoyers
I don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.You also have to think that Nashville's meltdown will course correct at some point during the year, no?
They still have three games against the Sharks that they'll probably win to surpass us. We'll be fine. lolI don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.
It's obviously far too late for Nashville to make the playoffs, but it's completely possible that they get healthy and win a few games down the stretch to pass the Sharks.I don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.
I think they remain bad but not this bad, more so in the bottom 5-7 range.You also have to think that Nashville's meltdown will course correct at some point during the year, no?
To be perfectly hyperbolic, more like Niedermayer and Pronger.Would Schaffer and Dickinson be a comparable duo to Karlsson and Burns?
To be perfectly hyperbolic, more like Niedermayer and Pronger.
?? stop shortselling our Orr - Orr pairing
Wow at practice for Team Canada for the WJC and Schaefer is the QB for PP1. If he performs on the big stage I bet he will be conseus #1 when all is said and done. Doesn’t mean he will be picked #1 depending on the team’s needs but it’s definitely steering in the direction that we will need the #1 or #2 pick to get him I bet. Also I am a little surprised to see Dickinson not on either power play unit
Their team as a whole is an extremely safe bet to course correct from shooting 5.56% at 5v5.I don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.
Didn't we say this in the 19-20 and 20-21 seasons too lolYou also have to think that Nashville's meltdown will course correct at some point during the year, no?
Yes, but also Juuse Saros.Didn't we say this in the 19-20 and 20-21 seasons too lol
Thank god Grier is laoding this team with gamers. If they didn't quit last year, we don't have to worry about a Buffalo-style collapse from this group (at least on the effort side).Yes, but also Juuse Saros.
Genuinely can't believe that the Sabres now have a worse winning percentage than us.
Yup. The absolute most important thing is that this team doesn't quit. The vibes are still good. I can't even begin to figure out what I'd do if I was Buffalo's GM. Feel like the only way to solve this problem is to disperse the team. Lots of talent wasting away over there.Thank god Grier is laoding this team with gamers. If they didn't quit last year, we don't have to worry about a Buffalo-style collapse from this group (at least on the effort side).
Both are too young to be "part of the problem", but if they shed and rebuild I'd love to pry Kulich or Helenius awayYup. The absolute most important thing is that this team doesn't quit. The vibes are still good. I can't even begin to figure out what I'd do if I was Buffalo's GM. Feel like the only way to solve this problem is to disperse the team. Lots of talent wasting away over there.
Nah, I think you try and pry someone like Cozens, Quinn, or Peterka away for less than they're worth. I feel like they'd rebound if put into a better environment. Pretty much every name Buffalo has traded away has gone on to have success with other teams.Both are too young to be "part of the problem", but if they shed and rebuild I'd love to pry Kulich or Helenius away