- Jun 23, 2020
- 6,025
- 8,737
Right now, our most likely individual pick is #4 (39.8%), but we have a 30% chance to pick #1-3 just as things stand now, and I suspect we'll drop as the season goes on.
Technically it's 4thStatistically our most likely draft position right now, is 5th. And we're closer to Anaheim in 6th (MTL, Buff in 4th/5th) than NSH/Chicago tied for 1st. Also for the bottom 6 teams, SJ has the highest p% over the last 10 with .5, while MTL is 2nd best at .45. ANA (.35), CHI (.3), NSH (.3), and Buff (.15 ) are mindblowingly poor.
I bet our 'with Celebrini' pace is also closer the Wings and the Jackets, though those first 10 games do count, so that's a pretty significant gap to close.
I do think the Sharks have been a bit lucky with their late game heroics- the loss of Blackwood will make an impact here. Goals differential can sometimes be another good proxy for team quality. Here, SJ (-27) is near league bottom with MTL (-31), NSH (-28), and Chicago (-21) with a few more games played. Speaking of goal differential, Sharks are on pace for an 83 goal improvement in that metric. Again, I think it'll equalize, but my hope for a -75 goal differential (and +75 improvement) looks to be on track.
Right now, our most likely individual pick is #4 (39.8%), but we have a 30% chance to pick #1-3 just as things stand now, and I suspect we'll drop as the season goes on.
Technically it's 4th
I'll do a mid season stats review, but quickly looking through our /60 numbers on Moneypuck, we're playing #5-10th worst on offense but we're still bottom 3 on D, and that means we are still playing as a bottom 3 team. Given we just downgraded from Blackwood to Georgiev, we could easily lose 1-3 more games than otherwise, and that could make all the difference between picking top 4 and picking top 6-7.
View attachment 946658
Nah, not when they're 3rd to last in points percentage. Top 3 in the draft is a real option. All it takes is another injury to Celebrini for any extended period of time and they can easily go on another massive losing streak. They've lost four of five as it is now and their next five opponents are all more or less playoff teams and a sixth that is a playoff team by points percentage.Maybe stop hoping that the Sharks will be in the top 3 of the draft) Schaefer will be on another team. We need to look at the real options - Smith, Eklund, Desnoyers
I don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.You also have to think that Nashville's meltdown will course correct at some point during the year, no?
They still have three games against the Sharks that they'll probably win to surpass us. We'll be fine. lolI don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.
It's obviously far too late for Nashville to make the playoffs, but it's completely possible that they get healthy and win a few games down the stretch to pass the Sharks.I don't think so. They are really bad and it doesn't seem that any of their acquisitions were course correct.
I think they remain bad but not this bad, more so in the bottom 5-7 range.You also have to think that Nashville's meltdown will course correct at some point during the year, no?
To be perfectly hyperbolic, more like Niedermayer and Pronger.Would Schaffer and Dickinson be a comparable duo to Karlsson and Burns?