hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 33,610
- 14,498
the draft is just a way to acquire trade currency. draft well, develop well, get a lot of assets to trade.
Did this all start because the argument was "the teams that win the Stanley Cup acquire superstars when they're available?"
Good teams score more goals than their opponents and I won't have anyone tell me otherwise.Listen man, good teams draft well and also trade well (BUT ONLY WHEN THE TRADES ARE GOOD) and also they have good players.
Good teams score more goals than their opponents and I won't have anyone tell me otherwise.
Being Buffalo would be never spending draft capital on actually improving the lineup around your star player(s). Even Buffalo now is a deeply flawed team because it's comprised of exclusively internally drafted/developed players that were BPA types that are being forced to try and play together when they don't fit.I don't know why everyone wants to be Buffalo so badly.
They'd have had homegrown stars like Reinhart and Sam Bennett though too... oh wait. Well even with ROR, the Blues would have had homegrown 2C Brayden Schenn... wait, no he doesn't fit there either.Yeah, the Florida Panthers definitely win the Cup without trading for Tkachuk. And the Knights would have without trading for Eichel. And the Avs without Toews. And the Bolts without Sergachev. And the Blues without O'Reilly. Definitely none of those teams were built on trades.
It started because I said we should look to move some picks this draft to make the 2025-26 team better and start shifting into trying to establish some winning culture for Mack/Smith.Did this all start because the argument was "the teams that win the Stanley Cup acquire superstars when they're available?"