- Aug 20, 2004
- 30,478
- 10,111
Jason Bukala releases his Top 40 sandwiched right between the CHL-USA Prospect Challenge and the upcoming World Juniors
40 is right around were Utah's 2nd round pick could land for us.
I am pretty sure they gave us Toronto's 2nd rd pick
Pyotr Andreyanov is betterI think this is the year to go after a high end goalie prospect. Ravensbergen should be the target and he should be there in the late first. I'd trade up with our two 2nds if possible. The timeline lines up, he should be NHL ready in about 4 years when Vasi (sadly) is just about done.
An unranked, 6'0 goalie playing in a russian junior league? It's a matter of opinion, but I disagree.Pyotr Andreyanov is better
.945 SV% in the MHL. FC Hockey has him ranked #48. European Pro route >>>>>>>>>>> CHL route for goalies. We'll see if Ravensbergen goes to the NCAA under the new rules, but that's my reasoning.An unranked, 6'0 goalie playing in a russian junior league? It's a matter of opinion, but I disagree.
Like pretty much every year, the scouts are enamored of the 2025 crop of talent available in the top 10. Actually, make that the top 15. Beyond that, though, the consensus seems to be that the class of 2025 lacks depth of talent.
One scout went so far as to say a lot of the players who will be drafted in the bottom half of the first round would in prior years be better suited to being second-round picks.
“It’s all relative of course,” the scout said, “but I’d say the second rounders this year would be third rounders in previous years where there was greater depth.”
Vansaghi is an intriguing power forward project. Could really pop off at State after Howard & Stramel are gone.Chiclets U did a feature on Michigan State, including a cameo from Howard. But their captain Red Savage spoke pretty highly of Shane Vansaghi who I think is projected as a late 1st or early 2nd. He's intriguing.
I do think that we might be able to draft a goalie every year, and hope that one of them hits, but all these guys are pretty much years away. Drafting for positional weakness doesn't make too much sense, IMO.Draft the best defenseman and goalie available in the 2nd and 4th. Then just take who you think has the best chance to contribute to the franchise in any role. Hope to find a diamond in the rough.
I agree and don't agree. Like if the clear BPA with the second round pick is a goalie, might as well take the shot. Any goalie drafted, at least with Vasy has years to develop before even sniffing a starting role here. If the goal is looking for goalie as a backup, then its kind of a waste of a pick to find a goalie and probably better suited to pick a defenseman or forward.I do think that we might be able to draft a goalie every year, and hope that one of them hits, but all these guys are pretty much years away. Drafting for positional weakness doesn't make too much sense, IMO.
The youngest goalie we have under contract is 29. We could probably build up some depth there, even if they don't make the NHL. There's not much ice time for goalies, so any good young AHL goalie gets hype as a potential NHL #1. Remember Askarov? There was hype just months ago that Nashville should trade Saros to anoint Askarov as the new #1. He's below .900 in the NHL with San Jose.