2025 HHoF: Who would you vote for?

2025 HHoF: Who would you vote for?


  • Total voters
    126
  • This poll will close: .

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,219
5,671
Dartmouth, NS
What’s your reasoning for not?
If I picked only one name and it wasn't Keith, would you be asking?

I didn't know the limit for male players when I selected (4). I scanned the list and picked three that I thought were deserving. Mogilny and Tkachuk are long overdue. Other than that, I don't need a reason other than feeling they're deserving of the honour - which is likely as much thought as is put in by the committee.
 

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,566
10,224
If I picked only one name and it wasn't Keith, would you be asking?

I didn't know the limit for male players when I selected (4). I scanned the list and picked three that I thought were deserving. Mogilny and Tkachuk are long overdue. Other than that, I don't need a reason other than feeling they're deserving of the honour - which is likely as much thought as is put in by the committee.

What's the rationale for Chara over Keith though? Fewer team and individual awards at the NHL level. More team awards at the international level, but no golds.

It just seems between the two big Dmen on the list, Keith would be the clear choice. And I say that as a big fan of Chara. When it comes down resume, Keith's is just.... better.

For the record, I picked both Chara and Keith in this poll.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,478
16,374
Vancouver
What's the rationale for Chara over Keith though? Fewer team and individual awards at the NHL level. More team awards at the international level, but no golds.

It just seems between the two big Dmen on the list, Keith would be the clear choice. And I say that as a big fan of Chara. When it comes down resume, Keith's is just.... better.

For the record, I picked both Chara and Keith in this poll.

Chara does have the much better Norris record outside of wins. He was a finalist 6 times whereas Keith only was in his two wins. He also played considerably more games. I think Keith was better at his best, including playoffs, but Chara was effective for longer and probably more consistent in his prime. I can see it depending a bit on what someone values, though I don’t see how there’d be enough separation to take one and not the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JaegerDice

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,566
10,224
Chara does have the much better Norris record outside of wins. He was a finalist 6 times whereas Keith only was in his two wins. He also played considerably more games. I think Keith was better at his best, including playoffs, but Chara was effective for longer and probably more consistent in his prime. I can see it depending a bit on what someone values, though I don’t see how there’d be enough separation to take one and not the other.

That's a fair argument.
 

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,219
5,671
Dartmouth, NS
What's the rationale for Chara over Keith though? Fewer team and individual awards at the NHL level. More team awards at the international level, but no golds.

It just seems between the two big Dmen on the list, Keith would be the clear choice. And I say that as a big fan of Chara. When it comes down resume, Keith's is just.... better.

For the record, I picked both Chara and Keith in this poll.
Both had great careers. Maybe it's because I watch more Eastern Conference hockey, but I saw more Chara and thought - regardless of any awards - he was the more impactful player for longer.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad